Do you think it's wild to think you two are partnered or are you just saying this about me scumreading you?
that we're partnered. there's nothing strange about you scumreading me, i am aware that i haven't been playing a great towngame but this team would make no sense even if i didn't know i was town.
Do you think it's wild to think you two are partnered or are you just saying this about me scumreading you?
that we're partnered. there's nothing strange about you scumreading me, i am aware that i haven't been playing a great towngame but this team would make no sense even if i didn't know i was town.
Do you think it's wild to think you two are partnered or are you just saying this about me scumreading you?
that we're partnered. there's nothing strange about you scumreading me, i am aware that i haven't been playing a great towngame but this team would make no sense even if i didn't know i was town.
Why doesn't it make sense?
if me/thomith was the team and i therefore knew for sure that daisy is town, i'd be straight-up throwing here.
like imag's posting d1 was good but it did still feel like imag could just have been passively backing up points rather than actively pushing the game in his direction. d2 was when imag switched gears and took more control imo.
Do you think it's wild to think you two are partnered or are you just saying this about me scumreading you?
that we're partnered. there's nothing strange about you scumreading me, i am aware that i haven't been playing a great towngame but this team would make no sense even if i didn't know i was town.
Why doesn't it make sense?
if me/thomith was the team and i therefore knew for sure that daisy is town, i'd be straight-up throwing here.
That's not throwing. We fade town Daisy and go into a Day phase where two townies potentially die. That sets you up for a 2v3 ELO right? Doesn't seem that bad to me. Even if the SK/Vig hits you/Thomith then at least you tried to distance putting him in your PoE
Do you think it's wild to think you two are partnered or are you just saying this about me scumreading you?
that we're partnered. there's nothing strange about you scumreading me, i am aware that i haven't been playing a great towngame but this team would make no sense even if i didn't know i was town.
Why doesn't it make sense?
if me/thomith was the team and i therefore knew for sure that daisy is town, i'd be straight-up throwing here.
That's not throwing. We fade town Daisy and go into a Day phase where two townies potentially die. That sets you up for a 2v3 ELO right? Doesn't seem that bad to me. Even if the SK/Vig hits you/Thomith then at least you tried to distance putting him in your PoE
wrong way around. we vote after seeing who the mafia and SK/vig kill. if my poe from that post was being followed exactly (yeah not likely, but if you suggest something you're inherently risking people agreeing with you) the vig or scumhunting SK shoots daisy, then thomith is limmed in the dayphase. i'm at 4v1 the following night phase and need to survive both the vig shot and the vote to win, relying on the premise that no one would call my bluff on a pretty clumsy bus. i don't think scum!me wins that scenario unless town massively trips over its own feet.
In post 924, halfasleep wrote:
this is my understanding: if we don't agree or even discuss who we're voting then scum (or in an edge case masons) are the only ones coordinating their votes. there's two so scum left so that's two votes that are potentially very strong in a silent voting scenario but useless for resisting an existing consensus vote. no agreement before the vote also probably makes it easier to lie next night phase.
-
oh imaginality posted while i was typing. posting anyway.
how confident are you that there are 2 scum left?
it's the most likely scenario. there is still one possible version of the setup where there's only one left, you're right.
Which version of the setup would you be referencing? And when I said scum did you take that as mafia or as mafia and SK combined? Because if we have 1 maf and 1 SK they can’t really coordinate their votes
TTTT on the setup rng. and yes i was meaning the red team not all anti-town roles combined. should've been clearer. and yeah, the scenario where there's only one mafia left has an SK so two scum by that definition.
In post 924, halfasleep wrote:
this is my understanding: if we don't agree or even discuss who we're voting then scum (or in an edge case masons) are the only ones coordinating their votes. there's two so scum left so that's two votes that are potentially very strong in a silent voting scenario but useless for resisting an existing consensus vote. no agreement before the vote also probably makes it easier to lie next night phase.
-
oh imaginality posted while i was typing. posting anyway.
how confident are you that there are 2 scum left?
it's the most likely scenario. there is still one possible version of the setup where there's only one left, you're right.
Which version of the setup would you be referencing? And when I said scum did you take that as mafia or as mafia and SK combined? Because if we have 1 maf and 1 SK they can’t really coordinate their votes
TTTT on the setup rng. and yes i was meaning the red team not all anti-town roles combined. should've been clearer. and yeah, the scenario where there's only one mafia left has an SK so two scum by that definition.
Considering Black commented (873 ) on 868 which laid out the remaining setup possibilities, and agreed with my proposed plan was was based in part on the remaining possibilities, I have a super hard time believing Black's 1029 is anything other than a clumsy attempt to excuse her certainty that there are exactly two scum remaining.
"holy shit this entire time i thought imaginalitys profile was a purple seahorse" - camelCasedSnivy
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}