I only ignored them because I had no comment. I was not attempting to distract from the BlondeSoWut wagon by doing so; in fact, I unvoted because I had stopped actively pursuing her case and her lynch isn't viable right now. It's still beyond me why you're twisting my Natirasha and BlondeSoWut cases together in whatever way you think you can when one, they're clearly unrelated, and two, I had a much better backing for the BlondeSoWut case than the Natirasha case (especially since my first decent scum tell on Natirasha, his being under the radar, came just yesterday).EmpTyger wrote:…Did you somehow miss the 6 itemized reasons I already gave? (3 of which, I might add, SC’s only defense against was to completely ignore and try to distract with the BSW wagon.)
If your “first decent scum tell” was only yesterday, then how did you FoS him 3 weeks ago?StrangerCoug [251] wrote:<snip>
(especially since my first decent scum tell on Natirasha, his being under the radar, came just yesterday).
Because merely agreeing with player X's case on player Y you don't like is not a "decent scum tell" from player Y. I will FoS in lieu of a vote for suspicious behavior if I don't think a vote is warranted.EmpTyger wrote:SC:If your “first decent scum tell” was only yesterday, then how did you FoS him 3 weeks ago?StrangerCoug [251] wrote:<snip>
(especially since my first decent scum tell on Natirasha, his being under the radar, came just yesterday).
If you're calling staying under the radar a scumtell, then you must frequently vote for town power roles, because that's their job too. Power roles need to find the proper balance to make themselves look scummy enough to not be NK'd and towny enough to not be lynched. As it is, your "tell" sucks.StrangerCoug wrote:I only ignored them because I had no comment. I was not attempting to distract from the BlondeSoWut wagon by doing so; in fact, I unvoted because I had stopped actively pursuing her case and her lynch isn't viable right now. It's still beyond me why you're twisting my Natirasha and BlondeSoWut cases together in whatever way you think you can when one, they're clearly unrelated, and two, I had a much better backing for the BlondeSoWut case than the Natirasha case (especially since my first decent scum tell on Natirasha, his being under the radar, came just yesterday).EmpTyger wrote:…Did you somehow miss the 6 itemized reasons I already gave? (3 of which, I might add, SC’s only defense against was to completely ignore and try to distract with the BSW wagon.)
I don't think that question is relevant considering that his "case" on Nat consists of nothing but BS. His actions have been nothing, he doesn't have a vote on anyone. So, I guess the answer to your question is no. His failure to place a vote on Nat is inconsistant with is "suspicion" of Nat.EmpTyger wrote:Caboose:
Do you feel SC’s actions towards Natirasha have been consistent with how he has described his attitude towards Natirasha?
So, then why did you FoS me in [237] for pointing out evidence to that inconsistency?Caboose [255] wrote:I don't think that question is relevant considering that his "case" on Nat consists of nothing but BS. His actions have been nothing, he doesn't have a vote on anyone. So, I guess the answer to your question is no. His failure to place a vote on Nat is inconsistant with is "suspicion" of Nat.
Am I the only one who knows that chenhsi is in this game?Caboose [cont] wrote:My question is: Why don't SC or xolelf have a vote on anyone yet?
Power roles should not vanish from the thread for two weeks while posting elsewhere.mrfixij wrote:If you're calling staying under the radar a scumtell, then you must frequently vote for town power roles, because that's their job too. Power roles need to find the proper balance to make themselves look scummy enough to not be NK'd and towny enough to not be lynched. As it is, your "tell" sucks.
What do you mean "yet" with regard to me? I had a vote on EmpTyger, then EmpTyger again, then BlondeSoWut. I explained why I pulled my BSW vote and leaving it idle.Caboose wrote:My question is: Why don't SC or xolelf have a vote on anyone yet?
SC's crap attacks are relevant. The whole gender thing isn't.EmpTyger wrote:Caboose:So, then why did you FoS me in [237] for pointing out evidence to that inconsistency?Caboose [255] wrote:I don't think that question is relevant considering that his "case" on Nat consists of nothing but BS. His actions have been nothing, he doesn't have a vote on anyone. So, I guess the answer to your question is no. His failure to place a vote on Nat is inconsistant with is "suspicion" of Nat.
"Yet" I meant to apply to xolelf.SC wrote:What do you mean "yet" with regard to me? I had a vote on EmpTyger, then EmpTyger again, then BlondeSoWut. I explained why I pulled my BSW vote and leaving it idle.
Start with EmpTyger and his making my Natirasha and BlondeSoWut cases sound like they have to do with each other when they don't. Your opinion of Appassionata would be good too.xofelf wrote:alright...my computer has been fixed for the most part...at least i can post now
i read through things to see what i missed but i'm not entirely sure about anything right now. As my computer is fixed i will be getting back into the swing of the game within the next few days.
But if people could prompt me as to what you want me to give my opinion on, i would be rather grateful..thank you so much
SC wrote:Again, being pushy is scummy.
Need I say more?Start with EmpTyger and his making my Natirasha and BlondeSoWut cases sound like they have to do with each other when they don't. Your opinion of Appassionata would be good too.
I don't really care what you look at, as long as you form an opinion on someone and place a vote.xofelf wrote:alright...my computer has been fixed for the most part...at least i can post now
i read through things to see what i missed but i'm not entirely sure about anything right now. As my computer is fixed i will be getting back into the swing of the game within the next few days.
But if people could prompt me as to what you want me to give my opinion on, i would be rather grateful..thank you so much
Yes. Why am I forbidden to answer xofelf's question? I don't understand why the post of mine quoted here is scummy.mrfixij wrote:Need I say more?Start with EmpTyger and his making my Natirasha and BlondeSoWut cases sound like they have to do with each other when they don't. Your opinion of Appassionata would be good too.
You seem remarkably insistent that SC has not slipped up regarding who a partner of his might be, despite thinking that SC is mafia. What do you think about Natirasha/SC? About BSW/SC?Caboose [258] wrote:<snip>
SC's crap attacks are relevant. The whole gender thing isn't.
Okay, but how is chenhsi’s not just as useless and opportunistic?Caboose [cont] wrote:<snip>
Votes left idle are useless. I think they always need to be on someone. There's no reason not to have a vote out at this point, other than to jump onto the most momentous wagon.
Nat/SC - Possible, but since Nat suddenly disappeared, he kind of dropped off my radar.EmpTyger wrote:Caboose:You seem remarkably insistent that SC has not slipped up regarding who a partner of his might be, despite thinking that SC is mafia. What do you think about Natirasha/SC? About BSW/SC?Caboose [258] wrote:<snip>
SC's crap attacks are relevant. The whole gender thing isn't.
chenhsi also dropped off the radar when he stopped posting. He another one that I have a "no read" on.Emp wrote:Okay, but how is chenhsi’s not just as useless and opportunistic?Caboose [cont] wrote:<snip>
Votes left idle are useless. I think they always need to be on someone. There's no reason not to have a vote out at this point, other than to jump onto the most momentous wagon.
This isAppassionata wrote:You sound really stupid, and annoying.BlondeSoWut wrote:Emp, I really really really really want to win! Thats why Im playing! So Im trying to find out whos in the mafia. I think its App so I said that and I said why. I know I might die so incase I do, I said Yorgi could be in the mafia with App. I really am trying. I dont know wut more you want from me. I said who I think is in the mafia. I voted for him. I said why. I answered questions. Now people are voting for me. I dont get it.
Vote: BSW
Appassionata wrote:I don't know for sure if anyone is mafia.
I don't like BSW and Natarisha. Apparantly, though from what I read Nat always acts like that, though I do not understand it.
BSQ, I see no logical reason why he would be doing things the way he is now...
If you have no clue who's Mafia, then why the heck are you voting?Appassionata wrote:I don't know for sure if anyone is mafia.
I don't like BSW and Natarisha. Apparantly, though from what I read Nat always acts like that, though I do not understand it.
BSQ, I see no logical reason why he would be doing things the way he is now...