Mafia 90-Lolwat? Mafia, Game Over, Mafia Win

[crywolf20084]

....... Okay this sucks. I had a post written out and just deleted it =-=

A)

Unvote

my random vote.

B)

crywolf, stop lurking

Shut up.

C)

I think anti-discussion is only a scummy mistake if it's intentional.

Scum tell would work in this sentence, instead of mistake. But anti-discussion is anti-town.

[StrangerCoug]

B)

crywolf, stop lurking

Shut up.

C)

I think anti-discussion is only a scummy mistake if it's intentional.

Scum tell would work in this sentence, instead of mistake. But anti-discussion is anti-town.

Aren't you being anti-discussion and thus anti-town yourself by telling roflcopter to shut up?

FoS: crywolf20084

[Litral]

I think anti-discussion is only a scummy mistake if it's intentional.

I was focusing on the "scummy" part. Saying something that is not correct is not scummy if it's not intentionally incorrect.

how can you tell if it's intentional?

I cannot tell. That is exactly why I have not voted MafiaSSK, just pushed him a bit.

I don't see what rofl sees.

SC, that is a very strange FoS.

[tyhess]

SC, I agree with litral. There's really no reason to FoS him. It's not like they were talking about something vitally important.

[StrangerCoug]

There's really no reason to FoS him.

It read to me as cywolf20084 contradicting

HER

self, which is why.

[Yosarian2]

Unvote

Vote: SC

The "misuderstanding" looks like it was done on purpose.

Uh...what? That dosn't really make sense.

Unvote:Lowell

Vote:Empking's Alt

[GnKoichi]

Actually, Yosarian, it makes perfect sense. Scum will sometimes "misunderstand" something so that they can push a vote without a good reason. It's a safe lie, because when it's pointed out they can just say "that was just a misunderstanding" and remove their vote. That was my initial idea, Coug, that you couldn't possible have misunderstood that, so it had to be a lie. However, for now,

unvote

because of:

not for the quote wall, that would be infantile. and i'd like to see if anyone else sees what i see before giving reasons.

vote: Rofl

It was odd enough for you to FoS me for no reason. It's just plain scummy for you to cop out on backing it up.

[StrangerCoug]

Actually, Yosarian, it makes perfect sense. Scum will sometimes "misunderstand" something so that they can push a vote without a good reason. It's a safe lie, because when it's pointed out they can just say "that was just a misunderstanding" and remove their vote. That was my initial idea, Coug, that you couldn't possible have misunderstood that, so it had to be a lie.

While your explanation makes sense, there's one problem with it—you said I misunderstood the statement before I even talked about the possibility. And the only way I see myself as guilty of misunderstanding MafiaSSK is if I'm lumping "wagoning" and "bandwagoning" together when they're distinct, which I don't know them to be.

[Penguins of the Serengeti]

confirm vote:Lowell

Have you lost your mind?

I don't think so. Why, have you found one?

Yes, it was acting irrationally, so I traced it back to you.

[Yosarian2]

Actually, Yosarian, it makes perfect sense. Scum will sometimes "misunderstand" something so that they can push a vote without a good reason.

I'm saying it dosn't make any sense in this context.

SC: I think the stratagy suggested by mafiaSSK is anti-town and scummy, vote ssk

Emp: You must be scum pretending to misunderstand ssk's comment!

Uh...what? SSK's comment was wrong stratigically, and arguably anti-town; I don't really think it's scummy, but Emp's attack on SC dosn't make any sense here. I know SC made some comment about how perhaps he misunderstood SSK or something, but I really don't think he did.

[Yosarian2]

confirm vote:Lowell

Have you lost your mind?

I don't think so. Why, have you found one?

Yes, it was acting irrationally, so I traced it back to you.

Everything I've done so far has been rational. Not sane, necessarally, but rational.

Random question; are you one of dripping goofball's alts?

[roflcopter]

Actually, Yosarian, it makes perfect sense. Scum will sometimes "misunderstand" something so that they can push a vote without a good reason. It's a safe lie, because when it's pointed out they can just say "that was just a misunderstanding" and remove their vote. That was my initial idea, Coug, that you couldn't possible have misunderstood that, so it had to be a lie. However, for now,

unvote

because of:

not for the quote wall, that would be infantile. and i'd like to see if anyone else sees what i see before giving reasons.

vote: Rofl

It was odd enough for you to FoS me for no reason. It's just plain scummy for you to cop out on backing it up.

i loled

[StrangerCoug]

SC: I think the stratagy suggested by mafiaSSK is anti-town and scummy, vote ssk

I already am.

[GnKoichi]

OH MY GOD! Coug, please read more carefully.

[alvinz95]

Bleh, too many BS overreacting arguments. They're fucking jokes. People need to listen to roflcopta cause he is deadly accurate in scumhunting.

[StrangerCoug]

OH MY GOD! Coug, please read more carefully.

I'm trying. (In fact, I went back and made sure that I was already voting MafiaSSK before I did so.)

Bleh, too many BS overreacting arguments. They're fucking jokes. People need to listen to roflcopta cause he is deadly accurate in scumhunting.

Something's weird here. I don't know whether to call this appealing to fear or sucking up to roflcopter, but whatever it is, it doesn't look right.

FoS: alvinz95

[GnKoichi]

Coug, I asked you to read more carefully because Yosarian wasn't telling you to vote SSK. He was giving a timeline of events, including the point at which you placed that vote.

The misunderstanding that I originally accused you of still stands, which was that you defended yourself against SSK as if he accused you of wagoning. He wasn't. He was saying that your attack on him was unjustified, as he felt he was pointing out someone who was "wagoning for the sake of wagoning", which you had said you agreed with. He was questioning your vote, when in theory the two of you should have been able to come to some agreement. But a page later, you still haven't figured out what you did wrong, as your attempts to defend your posts have nothing to do with what you've been accused of.

Again, read carefully.

[MafiaSSK]

OH MY GOD! Coug, please read more carefully.

I'm trying. (In fact, I went back and made sure that I was already voting MafiaSSK before I did so.)

Yos2 was doing a paraphrasing of you not telling you what to do.

[roflcopter]

OH MY GOD! Coug, please read more carefully.

I'm trying. (In fact, I went back and made sure that I was already voting MafiaSSK before I did so.)

Yos2 was doing a paraphrasing of you not telling you what to do.

hey look more information instead of analysis. why aren't there more votes on this scum yet?

[GnKoichi]

That conversation was tied to my analysis that Coug was faking misreads in order to cover his scumminess. Stop trying to stifle conversation, Rofl.

[roflcopter]

That conversation was tied to my analysis that Coug was faking misreads in order to cover his scumminess. Stop trying to stifle conversation, Rofl.

once again, i loled

[GnKoichi]

Once again, you fail to provide any back up to a statement. Your not posting just to tells us all you laughed. You're making a bid at painting me in a certain way. Instead of being sneaky about it, which makes you look like scum, why don't you provide some actual analysis of my posts?

[roflcopter]

what do you want me to say... no i'm not stifling conversation, i'm pointing out that ssk's posting is once again inane and not related to scumhunting, he's just posting bullshit to look active without actually participating

you should probably stop chainsaw defending ssk though its not gonna be good for you when that scum gets lynched

[GnKoichi]

Rofl, you have done nothing all game to show SSK is scum, yet you continue to hound him without reason (or without stated reasons). Are you just hoping that enough people will see SSK's name and start thinking suspiciously of him? Also, this is not me defending SSK; it's me anaylzing your posting pattern. I would say the same thing if you had selected any other player as your victim.

In fact, my entire "chainsaw defense" of SSK that you just pointed out was simply me making a case against Coug. It just happened to be centered around a statement by SSK that Coug misunderstood. You calling his post inane IS stifling conversation, since he was contributing to that discussion.

[Empking's Alt]

Actually, Yosarian, it makes perfect sense. Scum will sometimes "misunderstand" something so that they can push a vote without a good reason.

I'm saying it dosn't make any sense in this context.

SC: I think the stratagy suggested by mafiaSSK is anti-town and scummy, vote ssk

Emp: You must be scum pretending to misunderstand ssk's comment!

Uh...what? SSK's comment was wrong stratigically, and arguably anti-town; I don't really think it's scummy, but Emp's attack on SC dosn't make any sense here. I know SC made some comment about how perhaps he misunderstood SSK or something, but I really don't think he did.

So you think SC was lying about misunderstanding SSK? Well me too. That's why I'm voting him.