Sorry for my absence. Here I go:
springlullaby wrote:
The quote post above is a variation OMGUS: suspect someone by seemingly defending someone else for an action one has/is going to commit, the effect of which is to justify one's action.
This is further scummy because, if it is my prerogative to play as I wish, I certainly don't see anything remotely recommendable in my random vote. It is also scummy because accusing someone of being 'too eager' in the random stage is piss poor play and just plain scummy.
I have read the last pages or so. My comment on them is that I don't particularly like the dynamic of this town, there is plenty of talk and speculation but not enough true aggressiveness IMO. Note here that the SK talk may be interesting in the future but not now. Right now I would like to suggest more focused fire, starting now with a djekha wagon for example.
What can I say, I think it's a little extreme to accuse someone right off the bat because of a joke in their confirm post and a joke vote as their first post. I think I've explained to Dour why I was suspicious of his reaction to both of those and no OMGUS was involved. As I said, it's my way of thinking and I think how he reacted to those was a bit much. I personally don't think it's scummy at all to think someones too eager when they go after someones confirm post. Not much other way I can say it.
As for this "bad play is scummy" conversation going on, I'm going to have to disagree. While that could be the case a lot of the time, it isn't always. In my particular case, it was a matter of personal preference/opinion of play style. Bad play can be scummy, but it doesn't mean you're scum. Same for "good" play and looking protown.
Finding scum is more of looking for verbal slip ups (such as possible knowledge of something you shouldn't know as town, but are able to know due to your role as scum), because a lot of the time, bad play can be personal preference. As I've explained, while I understood Dour's aggressiveness, I obviously didn't approve of it in the situation he was using it in. Look how many protown people get my lynched every game. A lot of the time people leave it up to things that don't really determine whether someone is scum or not (some of which Goat mentioned), rather than slip ups. While it can be hard to tell the two apart, the difference is there.
I have to, at times, had a gut feeling about people before, but it doesn't really matter if you don't have the evidence to back it up.
GIEFF wrote:Panzerjager wrote:
@Goatrevolt:
He is calling GIEFF anti-town
, for simply wanting to lynch mafia. Therefore, mykonian is mafia.
It is clear to me from this post that Panzer thinks that mykonian's vote meant mykonian actually wanted to lynch me, as shown by my bold emphasis. Do you disagree, Goatrevolt? Does ANYBODY disagree?
If not, please join me aboard this Panzer wagon. Lying is bad, and lying about having lied is even worse. If you do disagree, please explain to me what I am misreading about Panzer's above quote.
It says pretty clearly that he thinks so, so I'm gonna have to agree due to visual proof.
"You say that all my posts are stupid like a motherf***ing SOB. I'm sick and tired of your constant BS." - Zwet to me.
"Fuck you... You're a pompous, ignorant fool, dejkha, and I don't appreciate your incessant badmouthing of me." - Zwet