Martyr Mafia - Game Over
-
-
ortolan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: October 27, 2008
-
-
Bloodmoney Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 16, 2009
- Location: a desolate wasteland
Big game, multiple targets. I have to get my bearings too, why do you expect me to finger scum based on a small pool of reactions?SilverPhoenix wrote:
You aren't reaction-mining, you are being belligerent. Two very different things. The point is you aren't doing any convincing of your findings, but simply moving on to get angry at others. Which makes me question why you did it in the first place.BloodMoney wrote:Why wouldn't you want to see reactions in this particular game? Don't you want the cult leaders accidentally slipping info on who your God is? Of course, the question is rhetorical, considering you are a cult leader.
That wasn't even directed at you. Why answer?SP wrote:
An honest mixup turned into a cult leader-recruit relationship? One aptitude of belligerent people is finding conflict where there is none. Another is finding connections where there isn't any, as in the case of me and zach.BloodMoney wrote: Oh? Why was that? To the best of my knowledge ortolan has a voice of his own. Need your recruit/leader alive?
Tell me, how is that the same as dropping the case? I dropped the line of questioning, because he gave me what I asked for. It doesn't absolve him of the lack of initial contribution, but there is nothing further I can ask of him at that point.SP wrote:BloodMoney wrote: QUOTE ME.BloodMoney wrote:Ok, thank you. You could do that next time without me having to cuss at you.
Why does defending yourself include voting me? Why do you have to explicitly state the "pressure vote" characteristic of your vote? If you think I'm an agnostic, do you really think the best way to "educate" and reform me is to OMGUS me? Nicely done buddying up, btw.SP wrote:
I'm not making a case against you, I am simply defending myself. You made an accusation way back when and I'm doing my best to convince you otherwise of your faulty logic. I never said you were God/Cult/Scum/whatever and I never said I wanted to lynch you. It has nothing to do with guts because I don't think you are God, but a horribly misguided agnostic. And I don't want to lynch agnostics, but to educate them.BloodMoney wrote:Also, you realize this vote makes no sense whatsoever, don't you? Even if you had basis for it (which "excessive fingerpointing" isn't), simply by stating the "pressure vote" nature of it you rob it of any purpose it would otherwise have had; because now I know that you wouldn't have the guts to go through with lynching me.
Huh? And I'm getting personal? I work my ass off scraping together working material for this town, and I'm being destructive. Huh. I guess I'll just make like the lurkers here and hope to be recruited for an easy win.SP wrote:Also, actually stating that you think I don't have the guts to lynch you is a very big mistake on your part, because not only are you belligerent, but you are cocky and think you're invincible. You don't win as town by standing out like that. There is someone like you in every game I play andalmostevery time they make a bad decision with consequences against the town. I'm simply tired of seeing such self-destructive behavior.
DGB, for reference, do you mean bussing as lynching a scumpartner to appear innocent, or simply distancing?
All of the lurkers are either scum or playing towards an expected wincon of recruited cult: Erratus Apathos, Indigo Heron, Double A, ortolan, qwints. Quite probably more. And yes, it's MONEY, not monkey.mask man wrote:eh; something happened and my post didn't happen or something.
I'm agreeing with MK on the grounds of playing for future WinCons, I want bloodymonkey or someone to point people that seem to be playing like this, because apparently I'm blind.
ortolan, post 337, note how zwet's defense is snuck in there with the implication that he would be a mislynch. If you have a scummy read of him, why do you think he'd be a mislynch, do tell?
What purpose does this post serve? The analogy is overly complicated and completely useless, especially since you don't explain the referenced strategy in AItP, without which your point has no purpose.mask man wrote:"But furthermore the cult leaders have no particular reason to dissociate themselves from God-"
Try thinking of AItP. But with the assassin having a very sucky role. And the guards being cultists in 3 different groups. and add a bunch of vanillas waiting to be recruited who for the moment want god lynched instead.
ortolan, why am I god? Other than my obvious godliness, of course."It is not the Russians I fear: it is the Doctor Bluthgelds, the Doctor Bloodmoneys, in our own society, that terrify me."--PKD-
-
populartajo Alpaca Caliente
- Alpaca Caliente
- Alpaca Caliente
- Posts: 9902
- Joined: October 16, 2007
- Location: Arequipa, Peru Profession: Scumhunter
-
-
DrippingGoofball Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Posts: 40670
- Joined: December 23, 2005
- Location: Violating mith's restraining order
Both. It may mean voting a buddy when it's clear the buddy won't be lynched, or it may mean actually pushing for a buddy's lynch.Bloodmoney wrote:DGB, for reference, do you mean bussing as lynching a scumpartner to appear innocent, or simply distancing?Paraphrasing a role PM takes seconds, fabricating a good fakeclaim takes an eternity.
"Metadiving DGB is like playing Roblox" - T3
"She's sort of like a quantum computer, her reads exist in multiple states at once. u have to take into account the other dimensions." - Morning Tweet-
-
ortolan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: October 27, 2008
I did already explain that even if he's one of the seven scum we only want to lynch one- God, whom I doubt he is. Plus his actions may otherwise be explained by newness anyhow. It's quite simple really.Bloodmoney (351) wrote:ortolan, post 337, note how zwet's defense is snuck in there with the implication that he would be a mislynch. If you have a scummy read of him, why do you think he'd be a mislynch, do tell?
Is this a slip? You seem to think I am playing for future recruitment (i.e. playing pro-scum) while knowing that I am not presently scum.Bloodmoney (351) wrote:All of the lurkers are either scum or playing towards an expected wincon of recruited cult: Erratus Apathos, Indigo Heron, Double A, ortolan, qwints. Quite probably more.
I need to look at that exchange between BM, MM and MK referred to in Bloodmoney's post above to see if they're possibly cult leaders/recruits/God trying to hint at lynch targets between one another.Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.-
-
SilverPhoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 560
- Joined: July 23, 2007
- Location: Bethlehem, PA, USA
First,mod, can we prod EA and Sir Tornado if you haven't already? Thanks.
Explain what you mean by this. I think I know, so I'll tie it in to one of your other comments.....(see below)BloodMoney wrote:Nicely done buddying up, btw.
Because it wasn't really a question, but an argument. I like pointing out arguments that I find faulty. I did the same when you attacked zach (which started this whole spat), and I do it all the time in all of my games. It is something I do regardless of alignment, my meta so-to-speak. Look up Open 101 if you want proof, because I did exactly the same thing with SensFan.BloodMoney wrote:That wasn't even directed at you. Why answer?
BloodMoney wrote:I get the feeling too many people here are playing to an expected win condition. If you're not recruited, boys and girls, play like a townie for fuckssake. Seriously. Grow a pair.BloodMoney wrote:I believe I've said this before, but I would like this to be entirely clear: DO NOT PLAY TO AN EXPECTED WIN CONDITION. I see too many people doing just that. In the here and now, every agnostic's duty should be to find God and preferably today, while we're in majority. So move your lazy asses andstop lurking and being scummyalready.
Bolded important stuff above. I'm trying to find the purpose of theBloodMoney wrote:All of the lurkers are either scum or playing towards an expected wincon of recruited cult: Erratus Apathos, Indigo Heron, Double A, ortolan, qwints. Quite probably more.And yes, it's MONEY, not monkey.wordingof these posts. I just wrote a bunch of stuff, but it was stupid and I need to think more. Something just....bugsme about it. Part of it deals with the comment I made earlier about putting the blame on so many people. Part of it deals with it being repeated so much, like that your opinion is god-like and should be followed (i.e. instead of being lurking sheep with no opinion, they should be lurking sheep withyouropinion). Essentially, this is the kind of thing you only say once, yet you say it three times.
No, but I expect focus in dealing with those reactions and what they mean. Simply stating that half the players are lurking scum doesn't matter to finding the real scum, aside from any reactions they the lurkers find alarming enough to comment on (which so far hasn't been the case).BloodMoney wrote:Big game, multiple targets. I have to get my bearings too, why do you expect me to finger scum based on a small pool of reactions?[i]Currently lurking about...
[/i]-
-
X Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: July 18, 2008
- Location: Cambridge, MA
Are you saying that mykonian is scummy, anti-town, or both? If both, it's not something he's likely to stop.Bloodmoney wrote:
mykonian stop digging your grave and trying to derail the town.mykonian wrote:
Wifom? yes. Likely? no.X wrote:
Can you say "WIFOM?" Someone playing aggressively, saying that God will play not like him?mykonian wrote:I think we can say that someone that has claimed cult till now, can't be god. God would never wifom us that way, as it would make people look at him. He doesn't want to be in the center of the attention.FoS: mykonian.Again.
Flattered...but how did you come to these conclusions (especially regarding Jebus)? Given, you changed your mind later, but I'd like to know what you were thinking at the time.DrippingGoofball wrote:Players that are NOT god:
Jahudo
Silver Phoenix
zachattack
Jebus
X
QFT.Bloodmoney wrote:
Um yes. Sarcasm or not what you say is correct.SP wrote:Wait, wait, I'm cult leader, right? Then it makes sense to deflect off God, right? (/endsarcasm)
Your point with the sarcasm tags?cult leader role pm wrote:You must protect him, or everything is lost.
That's what the Catholics tell me.Silver Phoenix wrote:And I don't want to lynch agnostics, but to educate them.
Jebus' post 331 is poor, IMO. I think he's making a weak case, especially seeing as much of his criticism of ZSW is simply ZSW's brevity. ZSW's response is also adequate.
Then replace out.pacman281292 wrote:
I've been busy, and I don't get this game.X wrote:pacman:Has 3 posts. A late random vote, a request for prods (ironic) combined with an FoS of ZSW, and a question of "What do we do?"-
-
mask man Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 489
- Joined: October 10, 2008
Thank you for the contribution toja, it really helped us.populartajo wrote:Maybe I should post here more.
I will.ShowThe monster entered the blacksmith.
The monster became Otto the Blacksmith.
Otto the Blacksmith became the strongest man in the village.
But one day he said,
ÔÇ£Look at me. Look at me. Look at how large the monster inside me has become.ÔÇØ
Crunch Crunch! Munch Munch! Chomp Chomp! Gulp!
The hungry monster ate Otto from the inside out.-
-
zwetschenwasser Doktor der Musik
- Doktor der Musik
- Doktor der Musik
- Posts: 8722
- Joined: December 7, 2008
-
-
Bloodmoney Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 79
- Joined: January 16, 2009
- Location: a desolate wasteland
You do agree, then, that the latter type of bussing--going through with the lynch--will not likely happen with god as the lynchee? This is an important point by which God can be found later on; consider Lover Mafia.DrippingGoofball wrote:
Both. It may mean voting a buddy when it's clear the buddy won't be lynched, or it may mean actually pushing for a buddy's lynch.Bloodmoney wrote:DGB, for reference, do you mean bussing as lynching a scumpartner to appear innocent, or simply distancing?
Please note the formatting in the initial quote. You either don't read what you quote, or you are opting for blatant misrepping instead of actual helpful contribution. Feel free to tell me if it's the latter.ortolan wrote:Bloodmoney wrote:All of the lurkers are(scum)either(playing towards an expected wincon of recruited cult): Erratus Apathos, Indigo Heron, Double A, ortolan, qwints. Quite probably more.or
Is this a slip? You seem to think I am playing for future recruitment (i.e. playing pro-scum) while knowing that I am not presently scum.
I would only have to say it once if people who weren't scum stopped lurking and started helping find god. And I never said my opinion is god-like. Hell no, feel free to bring something of your own to the table, but I don't see this from a lot of people. I don't want lurking sheep with my opinion, I want active people with opinions that help pinpoint the one person three/six people aren't willing to lynch.SP wrote:Bolded important stuff above. I'm trying to find the purpose of the wording of these posts. I just wrote a bunch of stuff, but it was stupid and I need to think more. Something just....bugs me about it. Part of it deals with the comment I made earlier about putting the blame on so many people. Part of it deals with it being repeated so much, like that your opinion is god-like and should be followed (i.e. instead of being lurking sheep with no opinion, they should be lurking sheep with your opinion). Essentially, this is the kind of thing you only say once, yet you say it three times.
Is there someone in particular who's lurking that you want to defend?SP wrote:Simply stating that half the players are lurking scum doesn't matter to finding the real scum, aside from any reactions they the lurkers find alarming enough to comment on (which so far hasn't been the case).
unvote, vote: qwints
I'm saying that his logic is painfully obviously broken and he should realize it. The derailing the town comment is about how he draws people to comment on his broken logic. So, anti-town and not specifically scummy.X wrote:Are you saying that mykonian is scummy, anti-town, or both? If both, it's not something he's likely to stop.
I don't think zwet is helping at all.zwetschenwasser wrote:I don't think Blood is helping much."It is not the Russians I fear: it is the Doctor Bluthgelds, the Doctor Bloodmoneys, in our own society, that terrify me."--PKD-
-
ting =) Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: January 8, 2008
Sorry for the long no post, I just read the past few pages.
I don't buy ortolan's and qwints votes on Jebus. I don't like zwet's either. DGB's vote on Jebus is the only one that seems to have an actual reason behind it, but I don't buy it. If Jebus is being bussed, then he won't be God. Besides, the cult leaders don't know each other. God doesn't know the recruits either. And I'm assuming that the recruits don't know God. Whatever his role, him being bussed can't be right.
Pacman still hasn't said anything. I don't like qwints' unvote. It seems like you're pulling out since the Jebus wagon has no steam.
I'll reread and pick someone to vote tomorrow.-
-
qwints Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: September 5, 2008
-
-
populartajo Alpaca Caliente
- Alpaca Caliente
- Alpaca Caliente
- Posts: 9902
- Joined: October 16, 2007
- Location: Arequipa, Peru Profession: Scumhunter
Glad you liked it.mask man wrote:
Thank you for the contribution toja, it really helped us.populartajo wrote:Maybe I should post here more.
I will.
Ill finish my reread tonight.Call me Tajo.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12894
Coming summer 2010: Tajo's Starcraft Mafia.
Tajo's MagictheGathering Mafia-
-
ting =) Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: January 8, 2008
Zomg. All this spinning is making me dizzy.qwints wrote:You don't like my vote, but you don't like my unvote? That makes a lot of sense.
I don't like your vote because you just hopped on.
I don't like your unvote because you just hopped off.the whole post where qwints votes (minus quote) wrote:This
unvote, vote Jebusthe whole post where qwints unvotes wrote:Thorough posts are not scummy. unvote-
-
Lord Gurgi Mostly Harmless
- Mostly Harmless
- Mostly Harmless
- Posts: 3369
- Joined: March 26, 2004
The Seventh "Live by the sword, die by the stake" Votecount:
"'I see', said the blind man."
----Bible
Thumb twiddling contest!
Disclaimer: This is just flavour, anything you think you're getting from it, you're not. There's nothing here to get. Go away.(11:26:07 PM) thesheamuffin: I'm counting gurgi because I would probably make out with him if I were drunk enough-
-
Jebus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: July 14, 2008
- Location: Here and there
My response to zwet's response to me, and some other stuffs.
I'm about halfway satisfied with this.zwetschenwasser wrote:1> To act crazy
Why were the reactions the first time not good enough? I still think claiming God was going too far.zwetschenwasser wrote:2> Seeing how people went nuts over it, I did it again so I could pay attention to reactions
This doesn't answer my question. You had four posts in between your claim and your vote on me - all of which were unrelated to a possible vote on me. So I ask again, why did you take so long to come to the conclusion my reaction wasn't quite right?zwetschenwasser wrote:3> That's the only reason I'm voting for you, and it came after my God claim.
Fair enough.zwetschenwasser wrote:4> You are correct
Acceptable.zwetschenwasser wrote:5> If you don't believe me, you can go through the trouble of looking for them yourself. I just completed my first MafiaScum game (not other forum game), which was Election, and I was the town cop.
Still, you made it sound like your reasoning, and despite being early on, it didn't sound like a joke to me.zwetschenwasser wrote:6> I'll do some.
a)early meta justification for a random vote, mainly a joke
'Kay.zwetschenwasser wrote:b)that was the thought. The vote was scummy, without good reasons, and opportunistic
Again, what was wrong with the reactions to the first claim?zwetschenwasser wrote:c)I was very tired, and I wanted to be a little crazy, so I screwed around by claiming ICL. When I saw that it started some reactions, I did it again (this time to be useful)
Heh. Not sure I like this one, but 'kay.zwetschenwasser wrote:d)maskman voted me for making a joke, and he said srsly?, so I did it right back at him.
But why did you vote Zakeri? That was the question - what's the reasoning behind that vote?zwetschenwasser wrote:e)he was being a jerk to everyone and acting like he owned the world and could just curse at everyone and act nastily. Venting my frustration at him.
Sounds like WIFOM to me. And where'd Double A come into that?zwetschenwasser wrote:f)someone came up with the possibility of me being a genius that could use reverse-reverse psychology to make me not look like god, and then said that he didn't think I could be so smart, so yeah. I'm not god though, and the post amused me.
(?) - quote this please?zwetschenwasser wrote:g)DGB was saying that I was scum because I was agnostic. Hello?
Skill level shouldn't affect who you put suspicion on - it's actions.zwetschenwasser wrote:h)g was the DGB reason, and Double A looked a little too noobish to not put some suspicion on him.
Hm. 'Kay.zwetschenwasser wrote:i)I realized Double A was a noob, and posted that I believed that he probably was an agnostic still getting the feel of the game and learning stuff. The second half was a joke.
Fair enough.zwetschenwasser wrote:j)Pacman's actively lurking and I don't like that. I'm suspecting him right now, right after you.
I see. Like him, though, I think you're a recruit - someone we don't need to lynch.zwetschenwasser wrote:k)DGB crazily switched to supporting me. First she was calling me obvscum and then she started saying "good catch, buddy! You're right! Pacman is obvscum! Lynch him quick!" Seemed too convenient to me.
Same question as before.zwetschenwasser wrote:l)I've already explained that what I learned from the first time was that I could get some great reactions from claiming God
I ask people who claim scum to replace out because it's no fun when someone claims scum - they're either scum and they've given the town a free scumkill (which is very much against the spirit of the game), or they're town and want to be offed. I'm sort of surprised you weren't lynched for that kill.zwetschenwasser wrote:m)I already explained why your reaction was strange. I thought you should have noticed I was trying to get reactions and just leave me alone, not ask for me to get replaced. That's a large part of why I'm voting for you.
Not really - as I said, you waited till five~ posts later to vote for me. Opportunistic only because of the timeline - before, you were apologetic, and made no mention of my reaction until five posts later.zwetschenwasser wrote:o)DGB called my Jebus vote opportunistic towards wherever the town was going. The town wasn't going towards you, it was going towards Zakeri, so DGB's point was flawed.
'kay.zwetschenwasser wrote:p)Sarcasm. DGB was being completely opportunistic, after calling me out on it.
Um... 'kay? Either way, this still doesn't answer why you didn't hop on my wagon 'till much later.zwetschenwasser wrote:q)It is clearly untrue. And don't start talking about me being apologetic, because it was mainly meant to appease you from your overreaction.
Again, as I said when I responded before, I wanted clarification - I had a general idea of where you were going, but I wanted to be sure before I called you out on anything. And questioning doesn't make one suspicious - you are unclear with your one liners, I'm not really sure in which direction to take most of your posts, which doesn't help me. I'm not saying this is a scumtell, I'm saying that while you may understand your thinking, someone else might not.zwetschenwasser wrote:I think you could have figured out most of my trains of thought without this rundown, and by asking these questions you are making yourself even more suspicious. I'm not that unclear, even with one-liners, and you make it seem like I'm actively trying to confuse people with undecipherable logic, which is not true.
Still looking for a response.Jebus wrote:Current thought - DGB is God. Zwet is Islamic CL.
^Though very likely wrong. I'd still like to hear what people have to say on it, though.
Sorry D:zwetschenwasser wrote:He didn't even give me a compliment.
I know, really xDSilverPhoenix wrote:
Oh, the irony of that statement: "The One-Liner" writing a post too long to read. XDJebus wrote: For the moment, I merely have time to check to see if you answered - I don't really have time to figure out what answer goes to what question (basically, tl;dr at the moment).
Ortolan: Still waiting on this.DrippingGoofball wrote:
Describe Jebus' meta.ortolan wrote:yes...
And DGB, this is why I'm holding off on saying something about Ort. Though as of now, I agree his vote is bull.
Go on, please.mask man wrote:Lol,
now that everyone has had a chance to die laughing...
Jebus, the only one of your attacks on zwet which have really phased me are numbers 3 and 5.
> You slightly change your reasoning to get on a wagon.
> You almost never explain your thinking.
Though that's not the case - I was pretty unhappy with not being able to completely understand where he was going with his posts.ortolan wrote:Still liking the Jebus wagon
He concoted a huge attack vote post against zwet, which suggests he is sweating at the prospect of being lynched
I wasn't really accusing Zwet of being scum, moreso I was asking further before I take it anywhere - I really don't/didn't expect a Zwet wagon, either.ortolan wrote:most of this post is "explain that thought" with little real analysis. Yes zwet comes across as scummy (new), but unfortunately in this game you can't ride by on getting mislynches like that today, because we are only looking for one very specific scum playa. I think you're much more likely to be He than zwet is.
Agreed. The prospect of CL's bussing God is sorta rediculous :sortolan wrote:This "bussing God" discussion is stupid. It certainly couldn't be the form of a normal bus- if God dies then they lose automatically. But furthermore the cultleadershave no particular reason to dissociate themselves from God- if they get lynched then they've lost anyway so they don't care if God gets caught as a result of their flip. Perhaps their recruits might care more. I am thinking in general the cults would react tentatively towards votes on God and if they looked serious/dangerous then start to jump in by arguing against them.
Then replace out?pacman281292 wrote:
I've been busy, and I don't get this game.X wrote:pacman:Has 3 posts. A late random vote, a request for prods (ironic) combined with an FoS of ZSW, and a question of "What do we do?"
Better explanation on Double A, I'm now satisfied. As for the Pacman quote bit, didn't you just say that you were referring to DGB buddying up with you using the reasoning as Pacman's lurking?zwetschenwasser wrote:I thought Double A was pretending to know less than he did, with his "what's an FoS" and "I'm confused" posts. But I realized later that my thinking was really stupid, and he is just getting a feel for the game, so I killed my suspicion of him. And I'm definitely not trying to discredit the guy. I'm just pointing out my thoughts on him. If he comes up with good arguments I'll be more than willing to follow and back them up. Pacman, could you put that quote in context? I can't find the post where I said that. Why are you repeating your excuse of "being confused" over and over again? All you have to do is read the first post of the game. You are now more than ever, number 2 on my scum list.
Is your memory faulty, or was that a load of bull when you explained it to me?
Please do.populartajo wrote:Maybe I should post here more.
I will.
Go on.zwetschenwasser wrote:I don't think Blood is helping much.
QFTting =) wrote:
Zomg. All this spinning is making me dizzy.qwints wrote:You don't like my vote, but you don't like my unvote? That makes a lot of sense.
I don't like your vote because you just hopped on.
I don't like your unvote because you just hopped off.the whole post where qwints votes (minus quote) wrote:This
unvote, vote Jebusthe whole post where qwints unvotes wrote:Thorough posts are not scummy. unvote
For Zwet - Just out of curiousity, who is on your scumlist?
For DGB - What was the reasoning behind your "These people are probably not God, and those possibly God?" list?
And for now,Vote: qwints- I like where this (to be) wagon is going, and Ting's 363 is a real kicker as well.Bastard ModGod. Mislynch fodder. Suave savior.-
-
mask man Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 489
- Joined: October 10, 2008
"Go on" Jebus?ShowThe monster entered the blacksmith.
The monster became Otto the Blacksmith.
Otto the Blacksmith became the strongest man in the village.
But one day he said,
ÔÇ£Look at me. Look at me. Look at how large the monster inside me has become.ÔÇØ
Crunch Crunch! Munch Munch! Chomp Chomp! Gulp!
The hungry monster ate Otto from the inside out.-
-
Jebus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: July 14, 2008
- Location: Here and there
-
-
mask man Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 489
- Joined: October 10, 2008
*implodes*
That thought of mine was rather complete if you ask me.
Anyway I'm getting a little less hard on jebus, but still...
Considering zwet + jebus cultShowThe monster entered the blacksmith.
The monster became Otto the Blacksmith.
Otto the Blacksmith became the strongest man in the village.
But one day he said,
ÔÇ£Look at me. Look at me. Look at how large the monster inside me has become.ÔÇØ
Crunch Crunch! Munch Munch! Chomp Chomp! Gulp!
The hungry monster ate Otto from the inside out.-
-
Jebus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: July 14, 2008
- Location: Here and there
-
-
zwetschenwasser Doktor der Musik
- Doktor der Musik
- Doktor der Musik
- Posts: 8722
- Joined: December 7, 2008
-
-
Erratus Apathos Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: Ivory tower
-
-
Jebus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: July 14, 2008
- Location: Here and there
How the hell am I treating you like an idiot? I'm asking you questions because I don't understand what you're saying. What's so wrong about that?zwetschenwasser wrote:I was going to answer your questions until you asked "who's on your scum list?" Don't treat me like an idiot. You are scum. The end.
And can you actually make a case on me with anything but the reaction to your claim?Bastard ModGod. Mislynch fodder. Suave savior.-
-
Double A Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 90
- Joined: January 19, 2009
- Location: Mount Doom
Wow, was I gone long...
Anyway, sorry for lurking for a while, but it was because I have this stupid paper do for the Model UN thing they tricked me into joining for.
I've considered the evidence and have concluded that Jebus has the highest chance of either being god, or his kid (because of his name).
So,vote: Jebus[url=http://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=119802]Capo de Tutti Capi III on totalwar.org - so amazing your head will pop[/url]-
-
Jebus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: July 14, 2008
- Location: Here and there
All I can say isDouble A wrote:Wow, was I gone long...
Anyway, sorry for lurking for a while, but it was because I have this stupid paper do for the Model UN thing they tricked me into joining for.
I've considered the evidence and have concluded that Jebus has the highest chance of either being god, or his kid (because of his name).
So,vote: Jebusreally? You vote me because of myname?Bastard ModGod. Mislynch fodder. Suave savior.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.