sorry everyone, i got lazy last night after coming home !
Herodotus wrote:At this point, though, Zeenon is more interesting to me. Two OMGUS votes against random votes? And calling something obvious that isn't?
i thought it was kind of obvious
my first vote was just a joke .. i guess not .
q21 wrote:Also, if you genuinely suspect someone, as you seem to with you EA vote you do need to explain yourself.
WOAH, i totally missed this post for some reason .
i never said i genuinely suspected anyone,
don't place words in my mouth .
i said that bandwaggoning is suspicious.
would you had rather me leave
my vote on the random person in the beginning,
or place my vote on someone i suspect a
little
?
don_johnson wrote:zeenon: what
is
your deal?
i'm not sure what this
question is supposed to mean,
care to explain ?
Herodotus wrote:On page 2, what could he have asked you? And if you would agree that there were no meaningful questions, why did you decide he was mafia? You did say "this quote seems exceptionally scummy," which implies either confidence or overstatement.
i agree, there wasn't much he could ask.
just because you place a vote on someone,
doesn't necessarily mean that you decide
they are mafia. there sure are a lot of
people in this game that assume things .
i voted for him because, as stated about twice before,
it's better to have one peice of evidence,
rather than a
clearly random
vote for Plonky.
Herodotus wrote:To put it another way, the majority of D1 lynches are mislynches, and the majority of D1 lynches are based on good logic under the circumstances.
QFT
Jazzmyn wrote:ZEEnon for voting Erratus while saying that he didn't have to explain why
, and for his poor replies to Erratus' responses to his vote and his follow up posts,
including the one in which he says that he thinks it should be obvious why he didn't have to explain his vote
. This kind of so-called 'logic' makes my brain hurt.
the underlined part is the exact same thing.
were you trying to make it seem like
there was more evidence against me?
i do realize that i should have explained
since a lot of you obviously didn't see
the reason why i voted for him,
which i explained later on anyways .
Jazzmyn wrote:I wasn't "lynching" ZEEnon (or anyone for that matter) based on the weird formatting of his posts. It was a random vote for a nonsensical reason which I thought was apparent, given that I wrote, "That's just weird" which I would think anyone could divine as random. And, no, I am certainly not a Jester.
this is true. i could tell that it was a random vote,
and as such, i replied in a sarcastic way.
don_johnson wrote:its textbook. "i am not plonky's scumbuddy" is a meaningless statement. statements such as that are a waste of space. how you would or would not act
if
you were mafia
is
wifom. don't get me wrong, the "i want to be careful with my vote" is a reasonable pont to make, but venturing into "if i were scum" territory is unproductive. and that appears(to me) what you have done here.
QFT. saved me time.