I meant townies vote pro-town and scum vote pro-scum,Caboose wrote:Well, then. Shouldn't we be looking at peopleMonkeyMan576 wrote:I certainly have heard of it, but you don't want to base a strategy on something that's the exception rather than the rule. More often than not, townies vote town and scum vote scum.Caboose wrote:Apparently, you've never heard of bussing.MonkeyMan576 wrote:No, we don't know for sure, but when building a case for someone or against someone, surely you would want to avoid lynchking those who are consistantly voting town and lynch those who are consistantly voting scum, is my thinking.molestargazer wrote:Monkey - surely that only applies if the case made is actually 100%against scum? It could be an amazing case, but scum could still jump on it, promote its wisdom, and lynch a townie.
Since we don't know, we can't be sure the alignment of those who jump on.noton the zwet wagon by your logic?
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)