Pie E7- (Open 129): Game Over before 762

dejkha · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:15 am

I respond logically to everyone else with the same reason before you voted for me. If you expected me to say it again for you when it looked like you were getting on an easy wagon, you're out of your mind. And the way he explained what happened was a lot better than your "WTF? You just blew a fuse there as if you were a nervous wreck about something! Defensive much?"

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:30 am

It was the same logical premise.

dejkha · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:39 am

Yours definitely wasn't. And the "WTF" was a big part of that.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:43 am

dejkha · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:46 am

Your "No"s, as seen in previous games, are points in which you cannot respond with a post that can counter the other. So by saying that, you're admitting that I was right. If not, then you'd say something that would support how I wasn't.

hewitt · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:33 am

Okay not even going to lie, once again, I'm so fucking confused by what's going on between zwets and dejkha. Am I not running on the same wavelength as you guys are or something?

dejkha · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:08 am

Nothing's going on. Zwet's just mad I treat him differently than all the other kids in the playground.

hewitt · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:22 am

Hm so hasdfags or whatever hasn't posted in...four days?

Empking · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:25 am

Mod; Prod on Has

please.

hasdgfas · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:54 am

So what I'm getting from this is that zwet is being an idiot, Empking is active lurking(why haven't we lynched him yet), and dejkha is being attacked by zwet over something, but I don't know what that is. Have I missed something? Why isn't Empking dead yet?

Empking · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:13 am

hasdgfas wrote:So what I'm getting from this is that zwet is being an idiot, Empking is active lurking(why haven't we lynched him yet), and dejkha is being attacked by zwet over something, but I don't know what that is. Have I missed something? Why isn't Empking dead yet?

No, I'm not.

hewitt · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:56 am

So you want to lynch Empking for active lurking?

dejkha · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:19 am

Let's do it...

alexhans · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:46 am

the empking thing is not funny anymore hasd...

I believe there's not much case in dehjka's pessimism regarding the roles...

Up till now Empking IS a bit suspicious... read his posts in isolation... not a single question to scum hunt anyone? wow...

hasd hasn't said much either yet... It feels like this game isn't starting but pushing an unargumented lynch with is stupid.

Zwet's play mi not liking... Not the Sinle “no” posts not his 1 line posts...

So up till now... the one most likely to be town for me is dehjka.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:15 am

Sorry, alex, but that's how I play. Dejkha, stop spouting bullshit with reverse psychology. My no means no, because I'm pissed off that you RECOGNIZE that what I'm saying is true and then deny it. That's stubborn crap I don't need to waste my time responding to.

dejkha · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:51 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:
dejkha wrote:
Where did I imply that I agree with him?
I restated what I said earlier, only I elaborated on it. I still don't think it was scummy for that reason.

Where did I say you had to agree with him?
The point is that you actually took the time to respond logically to him for the same case that I made that you dismissed as stupid.

What was the point of arguing that you implied that I agreed with him if you just admitted you did by saying: "I'm pissed off that

you RECOGNIZE that what I'm saying is true

"?

Seems a little scummy that you'd argue an observation that you knew was true. And like I repeatedly said, I don't think it's true, nor did I say I thought it was.

Empking · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:32 am

alexhans wrote: not a single question to scum hunt anyone? wow....

Explain.

dejkha · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:33 am

He's saying that you haven't asked a single question that would show that you're scumhunting.

Empking · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:37 am

dejkha wrote:He's saying that you haven't asked a single question that would show that you're scumhunting.

Alex: If Dejhka is telling the truth. Why did you lie?

alexhans · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:42 am

Empking wrote:
dejkha wrote:He's saying that you haven't asked a single question that would show that you're scumhunting.
Alex: If Dejhka is telling the truth. Why did you lie?

dude... look at your posts in isolation... you said two lines... voted for dej

For spamming up the thread with not-useful and acting really defensive, mostly the last point.

later stated you we're happy with your vote leaving no space for further discussion... in 73 you stated that you were positive about dej's scummyness...

The only thing you did later was ask wall-e to explain why he had said the case on dej was garbage... I think we have to try to prove someone guilty and not just tell others to prove him innocent...

I wan't to hear wall-e's answer anyway.

Right now... I think you haven't done a single thing to scum hunt. No. Nothing really. I'm trying to be as clear as possible.

And what's this...?

Empking wrote:
dejkha wrote:He's saying that you haven't asked a single question that would show that you're scumhunting.
Alex: If Dejhka is telling the truth. Why did you lie?

Some kind of a trick question to make me or dej look bad? What are you a lawyer? FoS on you mate:

FoS Empkling

.
What does everyone else think of Empkings post? maybe my perception is wrong... But I don't think so...

Empking · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:07 am

alexhans wrote:
Empking wrote:
dejkha wrote:He's saying that you haven't asked a single question that would show that you're scumhunting.
Alex: If Dejhka is telling the truth. Why did you lie?
dude... look at your posts in isolation... you said two lines... voted for dej
For spamming up the thread with not-useful and acting really defensive, mostly the last point.
later stated you we're happy with your vote leaving no space for further discussion... in 73 you stated that you were positive about dej's scummyness...

The only thing you did later was ask wall-e to explain why he had said the case on dej was garbage... I think we have to try to prove someone guilty and not just tell others to prove him innocent...

I wan't to hear wall-e's answer anyway.

Right now... I think you haven't done a single thing to scum hunt. No. Nothing really. I'm trying to be as clear as possible.

And what's this...?
Empking wrote:
dejkha wrote:He's saying that you haven't asked a single question that would show that you're scumhunting.
Alex: If Dejhka is telling the truth. Why did you lie?
Some kind of a trick question to make me or dej look bad? What are you a lawyer? FoS on you mate:
FoS Empkling
.
What does everyone else think of Empkings post? maybe my perception is wrong... But I don't think so...

How does anything of that relate to me not asking a single question to show that I'm scum hunting?

hewitt · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:05 am

I would agree that none of his posts really show much of scum hunting but i also don't really understand the if dejhka is telling the truth why did you lie? I'm assuming that Empking believes that he has been helping and is saying that alexhans is lying by saying he hasn't been scum hunting. That's what I get out of it.

Empking · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:13 am

hewitt wrote:I would agree that none of his posts really show much of scum hunting but i also don't really understand the if dejhka is telling the truth why did you lie? I'm assuming that Empking believes that he has been helping and is saying that alexhans is lying by saying he hasn't been scum hunting. That's what I get out of it.

I've asked plenty of questions (as can be seen by looking at my posts) and all questions directed to your fellow players help scum hunting.

Its not a question of "think" what he's saying is directly opposed to the facts.

dejkha · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:14 am

Emp, how old are you?

Empking · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:17 am

dejkha wrote:Emp, how old are you?

I don't give my age.

Am I voting for you?