DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:I know someone in scumchat was complaining about skitzer not confirming holding up the start of a game last night. Perhaps he is the shenanigan starter?
unvote, vote skitzer
Point A: I don't see why lateness of confirming should have any bearing on in-game alignment when we have no way whatsoever of knowing the reason for someone being late in confirming.Patrick wrote:I'm assuming vollkan wouldn't have said something like that in scumchat, and I don't see why anyone else would either. If skitzer held off confirming with some ulterior motive, I don't think he'd go round telling people about it. I guess we should hear from him though.
Point B: I was present in scumchat for the discussion of skitzer being a late-confirmer in another game that was starting simultaneously. If anything, I'd take this to mean that there should be absolutely no correlation between his not confirming in
In any game where I've ever been scum, been the mod or bothered to read role PMs after the game ended, scum have been able to communicate pre-game. It is certainly the norm.Green Crayons wrote:Also, (general question to anyone) how common is it for scum to be able to talk pregame?
Incog's post 34 is defending camn almost too blatantly. Must chew this over. But more disconcerting than actually trying to combat Green Crayons' argument is this snippet from the end of the post:
It seems to me that Incog is trying to undermine a valid point made by Korts in 23 with nothing more than bad vibes.Incognito wrote:There's something about Korts's 23 that I really dislike. I can't quite put my finger around it otherwise I'd elaborate further, but I'll try and do so if it comes to me.
Meh on Yos' post 39. There's more meat to these first two pages than he's giving the game credit for.
This seems like a horribly concocted way to attack Green Crayons. Also, hey, thatsKorts wrote:Note that I haven't checked all of your games by far, but going back 9 games, you only voted for the player at the bottom of the list once. Your claim of "at end of list" being a common reason for random votes doesn't seem to be particularly credible so far.
Again with the cockamamie semi-attack. I do not see what possible use you could find for this line of questioning.Korts wrote:Yet you have a stated tendency to always use the same reason for a first vote. Don't you think those two things are contradictory?
Your attention to detail is lacking. This is my first post.Yosarian2 wrote: I was tempted to vote someone who hadn't posted yet, as per my standard vote at that stage, but everyone had posted
I'd love for you to elucidate on this. As of post 45, the only vibe I'm getting from Patrick is that he's been unusually non-interactive.Yosarian2 wrote:I wanted to vote patrick, but he already is managing to give me pro-town vibes with his magical "I always give Yosarian protown vibes" machine, damn his eyes
charter's post 67 is a pretty list, but he doesn't draw any conclusions from it. And post 70 is self-defense meta. It feels like he's skating.
I'm already pretty sure Ether and Green Crayons are town.
@skitzer: Pre-emptive warning, if you serial lurk I will lynch you.
=======================
camn (2/7): Korts, Green Crayons
charter (0/7):
DizzyIzzyB13 (1/7): Ether,
Ether (0/7):
Green Crayons (2/7): Xdaamno, camn
Incognito (0/7):
Korts (0/7):
OhGodMyLife (0/7):
Patrick (1/7): Incognito
skitzer (0/7):
Xdaamno (1/7): Yosarian2
Yosarian2 (0/7):
OhGodMyLife, skitzer, DizzyIzzyB13, Patrick, charter
With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch.
Countdown To Deadline
============================