ortolan wrote:oh, no not really, he changed his view didn't he
Sting's just been tunneling on the millers all game and has twice said "I never trust miller claims" as though overanxious to justify himself
But was Sir's first stance to the mil scum or not?
And uhm, Sir could eas change his stance as he's been in this game since the start, while Sting left. So I do not like this rea.
ZazieR (475) wrote:But was Sir's first stance to the mil scum or not?
And uhm, Sir could eas change his stance as he's been in this game since the start, while Sting left. So I do not like this rea.
I do.
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
217 is a bit of a backtrack. If he's scum I like his referring back to 178 at the end. That means better scum than I'd expect for someone with a recent join date
232 got his eye on all the millers
238 asks for no mod-kill.
Yer um if Sironigous is scum he's good at it. He's good at appearing relatively inoffensive and not doing too much and being generally friendly, not drawing attention to himself and largely commenting on irrelevancies.
Sting is just scummy.
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
Bear wrote:Sting and Zironigous and Sajin have all placed anti-town and opportunistic votes. Sting was first so I'll
Vote: Sting
Bear wrote:they are all voting for the millers for cross-confirming each other, which means at best we will simply be wasting a day/night cycle and quite possibly being two townies down.
placing anti-town and opportunistic votes does not guarantee scum, especially when I change my mind (I know I'm good but probably not amazing enough to frequently name all 3 [presumably there are 3, perhaps not] scum players just like that). All you've quoted just looks like I've been extremely consistent to me. I called them out for it at the time and it's still the scummiest thing to me, especially in regards to finding Sting the scummiest.
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
ortolan wrote:placing anti-town and opportunistic votes does not guarantee scum, especially when I change my mind (I know I'm good but probably not amazing enough to frequently name all 3 [presumably there are 3, perhaps not] scum players just like that). All you've quoted just looks like I've been extremely consistent to me. I called them out for it at the time and it's still the scummiest thing to me, especially in regards to finding Sting the scummiest.
Well yes I voted for a miller claim. I provided my reasoning as to such, and I have yet to see you address that post. Another hole in your argument is that you yourself voted for a miler claim at one point. Was that not opportunistic by the same token?
Sajin (490) wrote:you yourself voted for a miler claim at one point.
Don't quite understand you here. Do you mean voted for a miller or voted for a miller claim? I don't recall doing the former and if I did the latter I don't see how it contradicts anything I've done (and actually don't remember it, could you direct me to where?)
Can you also direct me to your reasoning which I apparently failed to address also please
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
What is the relevance of 173? 427 is simply an example of you being scummy for the aforementioned reasons. You want to lynch them simply because they are claimed millers. What motivation would they have as scum to claim miller and draw attention to themselves when they don't even know if there is a cop in the setup. Also, neither of these posts show where I "asked for a miller claim".
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
I don't necessarily support the MafiaSSK bandwagon, his divergent/differently phrased win condition then insistence I paraphrase mine seems legitimate.
It's not Zakeri's fault she has a PR, although it is
very
annoying
Sting and Zironigous and Sajin have all placed anti-town and opportunistic votes. Sting was first so I'll
Vote: Sting
You do realize you unvoted a miller claim in your SAME post as you blanket posted, yes?
Saying whether or not there are cops in this setup is a completely WIFOM response to the argument at hand.
173 was not me voting for MafiaSSK because he was a miller, it was me voting for MafiaSSK because he had a different win condition to me.
Sajin (495) wrote:Saying whether or not there are cops in this setup is a completely WIFOM response to the argument at hand.
No it isn't, because the only benefit to scum of claiming miller is if they are expecting a cop investigation and want to pre-emptively negate it. It's also not plausible ThAd and MafiaSSK just spontaneously came up with a miller claim as scum, because they are not the only people who seem to have information about other roles in their role pm, see Zakeri. Also, what is your attitude towards Sting?
Someone refresh my memory- did we have a third claimed miller at some point?
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
Bear wrote:placing anti-town and opportunistic votes does not guarantee scum, especially when I change my mind (I know I'm good but probably not amazing enough to frequently name all 3 [presumably there are 3, perhaps not] scum players just like that).
All you've quoted just looks like I've been extremely consistent to me.
I called them out for it at the time and it's still the scummiest thing to me, especially in regards to finding Sting the scummiest.