FeRnAnDo wrote:Gut feelings, Huntress? you are saying that out of 12 people, your gut feelings are telling he is scum? Well, gut feelings are indeed valid in a ly-lo situation, but in early game they won't help much, eh? We've got to get reasons to vote on someone at this stage.
Unvote, Vote: Huntress
Why is this? At the end of the game, we HAVE more reasons. Early on, there's nothing wrong with gut.
dvdkid13 wrote:
I entirely agree with Fern's opinion on this. However, I don't believe Huntress's actions have been scummy enough at this point to award him a vote.
But I would like to point out lurkers: Scott Brosius and Darkstrike_11.
Anyone have any thoughts on lurker treatment?
Why do people have to be really scummy to get a vote?
And lurkers already? Really?
dvdkid13 wrote:Also
Unvote
since it seems the random voting stage is coming to a close
So who, other than you, fernando, and huntress, is scummy?
------------------------
Darkstrike, do you really have nothing to comment on? The bandwagons maybe?
I'll answer your questions although they don't seem helpful.
1) I love to be scum. I feel I'm better at it and it's more fun.
2) Yeah, I actually PM'd the Mod asking whether I was cop or VT until I realized what game this is and there is no cop. So then I erased it from my outbox. (Mod, if you saw that you had a PM and then checked and didn't, that's why. XD)
3) The only difference is that scum are looking for the other scum. So someone who looks like they are genuinely scumhunting could still be scumhunting AND be scum. Definitely don't ignore seemingly protown players when you are looking for scum. Also, if two players seem like they aren't connected, both can still be scum from opposite groups. That's about it I think (and this was probably the only one of your questions that was useful...)
40% is good odds. If you're that sure on me, you should vote.