The points against me were weak. I defended as such.Zilla wrote: KMD did not defend, he just tried to skew/slant the case against him. The fact remains that he did no scumhunting yesterday except tunneling on me. All his VP hate was copied from myself and Incog. He irrationally defended charter and mykonian. Even his Llama problems were already precedented by my comments on how Llama isn't playing as usual.
And ok, I tunneled on you, VP, Llama, Plum, Incog, and Camn and I tunneled on Myko, Charter, and Porkens being town. So you're right. I tunneled on about half of the game.
Incog raised a valid point on VP. I thought he was scum. Was I supposed to ignore that until something new came up and just hope I could jump on it before someone else? No. I'm going to vote for who I think is scum. I don't care what I look like. If I think someone is scum, they have my vote.
How is it irrational to defend someone who you have a town read on? Especially with Myko. He came near a lynch that I strongly disagreed with. If a lynch I don't like is about to happen, I'm going to try and stop it. See Stormer in Tranquility. See TM in large Family Guy. See any player I've ever thought was town that was coming near a lynch. I step up and say "Hey, I disagree. Let's lynch this person instead." Ok, I could have done more for Stormer in Tranquility, but you get the idea.
And no, my suspicions on Llama were based on games that I have played with him. I gave him the benefit of the doubt at first because I was waiting for him to step up and say, "Ok, here's why I did this and here's why it helped". When he didn't do that, I started to get worried. Then I got suspicious.
Define "shaken up" and point out where you see this.Zilla wrote: I read him in isolation; he was one of the most shaken up by porkens killing afatchic, and he recanted his position on me ON A DIME with no reasoning.
Actually, based on this,unvote: KMD
vote: Llamafluff