Green Crayons wrote:Alex, because you were rationale and clear headed. DANGER WILL ROBINSON, etc, etc is what flashed through my head.
Thanks. I guess...
full game read done... It was fun
FULL REVIEW COMING IN
Zee wrote:you have a right to voice
your opinion, Magus_Stragus .
i would think it would make
it easier for you.
it reduces
the distance you have to move your eyes .
but nevermind that, we are off-topic .
This will be a classic. lol.
Azhrei wrote:
5.Charrat ~ Doing a classic Charrat. I have no clue. (Charrat, I hate you )
6.Green Crayons ~ Townie, I'm reasonably sure. One of the few people who has been totally consistent, and seems wholly for the town.
Guess we can't trust anyone after all.
And damn Charrat's list in 113!!! Mafia survey!
hohum wrote:God you're a raging faggot. The only thing good about this game is that I'm going to be lynched today.
hohum wrote:got prodded. I'm around waiting to be lynched.
2 games that I've played with him... 2 games that make me wish to never encounter him again.
Charrat wrote:
Charrat 7 Posts
Vote Azhrei, Unvote
Green Crayons 8 posts
Vote ZEEnon, Vote hohum
So... in 170 you recognized you were "lurking"... XD Nice scum tactic.
And post 171 is just so townie-ish I have to take my hat off in front of you Charrat.
Alexhans wrote:
Well... if I had to choose... seeing the list Charrat assembled... I'm wary of Charrat ,Tom and Green crayons... Why? Because I can't read them... Few posts... Charrat seems like a good player and that scares me, if he were scum... In the other hand, he seems to be giving great ideas to spark discussion (wich always help the town) so I wouldn't vote for him.
Wow. I had you almost
Now I understand why you killed me.
seb456zig wrote:
@Azhrei: I dont think you are scum but I think you are a very lazy person
@ZEE: I think you are a very poor strategy player and should play newbie games before you try another one of these "real" games.
@Hohum: I don't find you scummie realy, but IGMEOY
@person saying FoSes suck: YOU SUCK!
@people saying these excess "@"s are spam: dont read them then
@Azhrei (again): i didnt lie about me never being NKed. in fact, this is my third game (ZOMFG, a card) but yeah. It would have been more believable if i mentioned that before
@scum:i dislike you ingame but ooc you are playing realy well. and also, are you ZEE?
@town: hi
@everyone who read all of these: y did you waste your time with all of them? it seems pretty pointless to read them all
@people that have questions towards me: ask them
This one is gonna stay in my mind for a long time too. Sometimes people don't realize that certain jokes are dangerous.
seb wrote:
What I personally believe (quote me if I die)
ZEEnon & Charrat are scumbuddies
Hohum is town
Alexhans is town
others im not sure about. If you have any questions for me, please ask them
Why didn't you listen to him???
wow... Zee vs seb was the fight of the century...
Then I died. So the following is new to me:
mmm... Artem rushed a bit in voting people... Hohum was probably town.
310 great post man! great psychology.
I'm seeing some suspicions going Charrat's way... What happened to them?
Magus_Stragus wrote:
The title of the game and GM's words suggest that this game is heavily based on sanities. There's even a chance that all cops are not sane. You can just say that you're a sane cop just because Alex was naive. You're the one being naive... ¬_¬
lol... Great Answer.
and there goes Hohum in post 329... Voting the claimed cop...
Hohum wrote:
He shouldn't have claimed, period. You don't claim immediately after a result. You're not supposed to claim unless you HAVE to. He should have at minimum tried to push a case.
Who gave him the right to boss everyone around? :<
Green Crayons wrote:
I'm looking forward to hohum actually acknowledging my existence in this game.
Another lol! XD
really Zee...349 makes you follow mafia twice... first after Charrat and now after GC...
MOD wrote:Prod count: Shinnen_no_me, ZEEnon, Charrat, Green_Crayons(2), hohum (2)
mmmm....
MAgus/shinen wrote:
Just a question: if you are willing to get hammer, why don't you hammer yourself?
uhhhh... bad idea!
hohum wrote:
self-hammers are never appropriate under any circumstances, and can cause game breakage under certain circumstances. I would never do you guys the disservice of hammering until you as a town believe you have gotten everything out of me that you can possibly get.
Wagons are a good source of information, even if they lead to a mislynch. Only scum would want to cut that short.
But he did... in a game we played together. 735 im not mistaken. it's in my wiki.
Charrat wrote:
I don't think there is a wrong way to pronounce my nickname since it is just a made up name. I usually go with "Cha-rat" rather than "Char-rat" or "Sha-rat"
How did the game developed to this? nickname pronounciation forum. lol. mine's Alex-Hans (Hans was my dog) don't link it and say Aleshans like if it was french
GC from the mafiachat talking about Zee wrote:
I would rather get him out of the way before he garnishes the doctor's attention.
He really had his own attention.
@Green Crayons: what was your reasoning here? did you give it much thought or relied more on the lylo situation you were in?
Green Crayons wrote:My results were: Magus (replaced by Shinn) as innocent Night One, Charrat as guilty Night Two.
the miller issue with sanities is rather confusing...
MOD:
does he always show guilty regardless of the cop's sanity?
Azhrei wrote:
GC because he has struck me as townie the whole game through
Poor Azh... they really sold you that shit didn't they?
If I were you I would wake up from the dead as a zombie and go for their brains... Revenge!
Loved 432... Congrats GC.
NO!!!! 435 just lost the game. talking about a post that sucks... too late for 437 excuses...
Azhrei wrote:
Oh, and suggestin a no-lynch is generally a scum tell.
I'm curious about this... How's nolynch a scum tell when you're at lylo and have a lot of PR's to gain information with? I just don't get it. It's the obvious choice because it also makes it easier for everyone. less town to mislych. Even if there is a mass claim.
WOW GC look at 458. you take the trouble of linking every number in the post? That's definetly a scumtell. It says I wanna win so badly I even do this!
Azhrei wrote:
You try to use an analogy concerning a popular TV show to explain your actions?
lol.
475 GC's post was a bit scummy?
Charrat wrote:
1. Maybe one less town player, maybe not, depending on how the different night actions line up.
2. We will have more information, but we don't know whether or not that information will be helpful. It could be worthless or it could be absolutely decisive. I am leaning towards the former, but again, its not clear.
3. We may have a smaller pool of players to determine who is scum on Day 4, so that would increase the chances of getting scum then and the next day, if we choose right D4.
Come on. This demonstrated a no-lynch was for the best...
NOw.. the night actions... Everyone investigated Hohum... wonder why...
MOD:
I think the setup was a bit pro-mafia because with the sanity issues the info cops could use was practically null.(unless there's a way to cross reference all the info and logically deduce results but with scum confusing people and blocking them...) It was like a normal game with just townies that had random informants who they couldn't trust. Paranoia. But maybe with other players it would've been different. GC and Charrat handled themselves very well. Although a bit lurkish for my taste. I'm very talkative. What I liked very much about GC was his consistency all along. Maybe another game with a similar setup would be much easier for the town because they'd have a reference to hold on to. And no one was even close about the random sanity cop role.