Sorry VP - I don't understand the first two points you made.
VP wrote:Everyone approaches the game differently, and thus would require a different approach to catch scum. IMO, there aren't hard and fast rules for catching scum that would apply to every player on this site.
In response to your argument that each player needs to be attacked differently, I make the point that your change in style hasn't been to effectively target MafiaMann (then speculate on what might have been the reason for it.)
You then say that 1) it's only my opinion that you haven't changed your style to attack MafiaMann but also
2) that you aren't suggesting that your changing actions were part of a plan to catch MafiaMann.
My question is this - if your justification for changing attacking styles is that you should adapt when attacking each person and attack them differently, can you show how your change in styles when attacking MafiaMann is a more effective way to attack him than your attack on Mastin?
Your point about buddying is a fair one, that's a distinction between buddying and distancing that I hadn't considered. It's possible to buddy scum->town but not possible to distance any other way than scum->scum.
Your willingness to base your vote largely off my case and call me scummy at the same time continues to make me less and less comfortable with that lynch.
Getting less confortable with the lynch? How surprising, given just last post you 'very much would' like to lynch him. It's not like you've found quick and easy reasons to get off his case twice already in the thread.
And as for my reasons, you'll find them already stated. Some are based on what you've written, some are not and either way - my problem is that you are making a strong case and not going through with it, which as we've just seen with Mastin is not like you, and you're a repeat offender when it comes to MM. I'm trying to hold you accountable to your own case.
SC wrote:MafiaMann on the other hand has looked scummy as anything over the recent Mastin wagon, to go with his earlier behaviour. Specifically, posts 715, 742-3, 819 and especially 800 recently, and earlier his false dialog with FA @ 256-265 and 390ish set off alarm bells for me. Finally, I found the following posts scummy, 273, 321, 357, 645.
You can find more elaboration on what I found scummy about these posts in my post @ 702, along with a fairly strong case presented by VP @ 643.
unvote Achilles, vote MafiaMann