well.... (sorry for the huge quotes
)
Lotta content just for page 2...
I have to say,
this is probably the final RVS vote, However, i feel as if that vote was optional. he didn't need to wagon on Zito, he chose to. i tend to believe that he knew there were already two votes on him, and felt obligated to put a third, and put Zito at L-2. possibly, to bring us out of the RVS, but, maybe not. either way, i don't think that's a scum-tell.
This made me giggle a lot 
Archon wrote:
Random votes do nothing, as well are the usual thing to do. Usual things don't raise questions, and get the game going. Why do something orthodox and keep the game in a useless stage when you can do something unorthodox and start the conversation more quickly, and (possibly) have a better chance at analyzing players?
Like we're doing now? Random votes are very useful in the beginning of the game. And, in more final stages of the game, the lynch analysis, bandwagon analysis, vote hoping, inconsistent voting, and opportunistic voting are all factors taken in, when trying to analyze for a lynch in lylo, or even at day 3.
canadianbovine wrote:
As a town member, you are hindering yourself by not using your vote. The vote is the only power you have as a townie besides the post. By not using your vote, you are not being a productive townie.
I'm not sure if eager is the right word. I'm not eager for you to vote, i just find it strange that a member of the town would not want to use one of there two powers.
you are afraid of voting off a townie?
How can you be afraid of a mislynch this early in the game? there is no way that 5 players are going to accidentally quicklynch someone without making sure they're town.
Zito.
Papa Zito wrote:AshMC1984 wrote:Papa Zito wrote:MiteyMouse wrote:Vote: Papa Zito
It's your turn my friend!
My turn?
That's two votes on me. Hmm.
Insinuation without accusation or questioning? If you think MM is scummy say so.
Vote: Papa Zito
Observation.
There's a school of thought that the third voter on a bandwagon is likely scum. What do you think?
1. I do not understand what MM means by Zito's turn...
2. I agree with Ash.
3. Saying that it was an observation does not justify the fact that you publicly noted that he was voting you. I personally think that MM's vote was an RVS vote, and i don't want to say that it was an educated vote, but he knew what he was doing, how he technically started the first wagon.
4. I don't think that it's always the third vote on the wagon. It's usually opportunistic votes that are scummy. However the third/fourth vote on a wagon (with five to lynch) are generally the players that lurk, and post little contend and vote on the wagon. In larger games, it's harder to tell. But yes, i remotely agree with you Zito.
5. But, if you're going to say that it's just an observation, could you go in depth a little more?
I don't see anything scummy on Zito. I think the wagon is just a bad idea.
unvote
.
Papa Zito wrote:
I'm at L-2 on the second page. Thoughts?
we gotta get there some time.
Nuwen wrote:Archon wrote:
Random votes do nothing, as well are the usual thing to do. Usual things don't raise questions, and get the game going. Why do something orthodox and keep the game in a useless stage when you can do something unorthodox and start the conversation more quickly, and (possibly) have a better chance at analyzing players?
I don't feel like turning this into a theory disagreement. My concern is that you're now abiding by a strict policy, but haven't before. Answer my last question: Why the change from your town meta?
I'm pretty sure Archon was scum in 801. He replaced out though.
Archon wrote:
I haven't played in a few months...?
poor answer.
