If I answered it seriously then I wouldn'y be able to continue having this much fun! *sidestep*magnus_orion wrote:ebwop: I want everyone's opinion on the above. I want agreement or disagreement, not sidestepping.
I've been out of the random voting stage since my second post. Just because I'm being productive doesn't mean I can't have fun! Answering your question does though.magnus_orion wrote:While right now I have scum vibes from artem, they are of course based on a single post, and therefore unreliable. I'd like to have further imput from artem to test my read vigorously. Therefore, sidetracking the conversation into a subconversation, while keeping my vote where I think it should be, of course, allows me to get reads on a larger pool of players at once, including artem. There's a method to my madness. This has the side-benefit of ending the RVS, or as you adequately put it, stopping people from being able to "continue having so much fun!"
Pfft.magnus_orion wrote:okay.
artem's was the first psudo-serious seeming post. Therefore, artem is scum
Red dye voted artem, giving town vibes
Kairyuu votes red dye giving scum vibes by voting town.
It would seem you've chosen to turn down the plea bargain I offered you. Now you have no immunity tomorrow. I promise that you WILL regret it.Kairyuu wrote:Pfft.magnus_orion wrote:okay.
artem's was the first psudo-serious seeming post. Therefore, artem is scum
Red dye voted artem, giving town vibes
Kairyuu votes red dye giving scum vibes by voting town.
That's my opinion.
That you would disagree is predictable, town or scum. "Denial is the most predictable of all human reactions"Kairyuu wrote:Do you even have to ask? You're posting an opinion that calls me scum based on horrid reasoning, and asking my opinion of it. Is it not blatantly obvious that I would bias towards disagreement?
Given that you're the D1 lynch, and will flip scum, I'm pretty sure I won't be regretting not collaborating with you. Thank you and have a noose filled day!Red_Dye wrote:It would seem you've chosen to turn down the plea bargain I offered you. Now you have no immunity tomorrow. I promise that you WILL regret it.Kairyuu wrote:Pfft.magnus_orion wrote:okay.
artem's was the first psudo-serious seeming post. Therefore, artem is scum
Red dye voted artem, giving town vibes
Kairyuu votes red dye giving scum vibes by voting town.
That's my opinion.
Obviously you aren't going to admit to being scum, but how about explaining your feelings towards your scum partner?Kairyuu wrote:Do you even have to ask? You're posting an opinion that calls me scum based on horrid reasoning, and asking my opinion of it. Is it not blatantly obvious that I would bias towards disagreement?
1. The first approach to ending the RVS is more likely to be made my town than scum, though it could be made by either.magnus_orion wrote:That you would disagree is predictable, town or scum. "Denial is the most predictable of all human reactions"Kairyuu wrote:Do you even have to ask? You're posting an opinion that calls me scum based on horrid reasoning, and asking my opinion of it. Is it not blatantly obvious that I would bias towards disagreement?
I rather more concerned about which points of the reasoning you consider horrid.
I assume you mean Artem. I think he's made all of one post, and said post contained no strong tells either way.Red_Dye wrote:Obviously you aren't going to admit to being scum, but how about explaining your feelings towards your scum partner?Kairyuu wrote:Do you even have to ask? You're posting an opinion that calls me scum based on horrid reasoning, and asking my opinion of it. Is it not blatantly obvious that I would bias towards disagreement?
Alright, so running on the assumption of who you are talking about, since its rather unclear.1. The first approach to ending the RVS is more likely to be made my town than scum, though it could be made by either.
2. One who would attempt to extend the RVS by opposing said approach is more likely scum than town.
3. One who would call out said opposition as scummy is more likely town than scum.
Who exactly has opposed what? I'm pretty sure the only thing I opposed was the stopping of my fun. That and the ending of the random voting stage are far from mutually exclusive. In fact I feel that I've been posting seriously since my second post. Your attempt to spin it as anything else is whats scummy here.Kairyuu wrote:1. The first approach to ending the RVS is more likely to be made my town than scum, though it could be made by either.magnus_orion wrote:That you would disagree is predictable, town or scum. "Denial is the most predictable of all human reactions"Kairyuu wrote:Do you even have to ask? You're posting an opinion that calls me scum based on horrid reasoning, and asking my opinion of it. Is it not blatantly obvious that I would bias towards disagreement?
I rather more concerned about which points of the reasoning you consider horrid.
2. One who would attempt to extend the RVS by opposing said approach is more likely scum than town.
3. One who would call out said opposition as scummy is more likely town than scum.
So essentially you have your reads on myself and Red_Dye flipped, and your reasoning on Artem is null. Good enough for you?
Your scum partners first post is so scummy it makes me feel dirty just by reading it. *shudder*. I don't know how any self respecting townie could possibly read it and feel unaffected, unless of course they were even dirtier themselves!Kairyuu wrote:I assume you mean Artem. I think he's made all of one post, and said post contained no strong tells either way.Red_Dye wrote:Obviously you aren't going to admit to being scum, but how about explaining your feelings towards your scum partner?Kairyuu wrote:Do you even have to ask? You're posting an opinion that calls me scum based on horrid reasoning, and asking my opinion of it. Is it not blatantly obvious that I would bias towards disagreement?
kMagnus wrote: Okay, I'm getting a pretty strong town read on red dye so far, if only because he/she (?) is thinking along similar lines as me.
Because I agree that we should get out of RVS and dismissing your (BS) attacks will simply get us back to square one.Magnus wrote: Why do you consider my reasoning serious enough to defend as far as you have, as opposed to dismissing it as the obvious (in fact, stated) attempt to end the RVS that it is?
Why do you care more what he thinks then what I think? Now I'm a little jealous.
Dismissing my attacks would give me a more town read on you. With reads I would not be back at square one.Artem wrote:Because I agree that we should get out of RVS and dismissing your (BS) attacks will simply get us back to square one.Magnus wrote: Why do you consider my reasoning serious enough to defend as far as you have, as opposed to dismissing it as the obvious (in fact, stated) attempt to end the RVS that it is?