Wow Tamuz that was an interesting statement you said in post 70. Let me explain why. Oh and btw I find it so very interesting how you suddenly are jumping on me when earlier you said you were getting bad vibes on Stam.
But let's not get on that tangent- let's get back to the original tangent the one where I show you why EYNH's logic is poor and why mine is acceptable for me to FOS for him. First let's quote you.
Tamuz wrote:Wow Kain... a retaliatory suspicion when one votes you. That FOS on EYNH makes me very suspicious of you, you have no reason to fling accusations back into his face, just because he voted for you. His reason may be weak, but your is even weaker because it is based on his weak reason. …..
Vote Kain
Why should a justifiable FOS arise suspicion on your part? I think I might understand that you cannot fathom reason or logic if you FOS me for it, but by placing a third vote that was really super scummy. I have every reason to FOS someone EYNH who voted for me based on such lousy reasons. Logic dictates that only a newbie or scum votes for someone ( and I'm not speaking about a random vote) with as lousy reasons as he had on me.
POST 66:
EnterYourNameHere wrote:Tamuz wrote:Then again, I may be missing why LML's chummyness makes him so guilty, because I don't see it.
*EYNH SAID THE FOLLOWING:*
My thoughts exactly. I'm not saying "LML is not scum," I'm saying "if LML is scum, it's for reasons other than this." And he very well could be, but at the moment, I don't suspect him.
I don't have time to leave a more detailed reply at the moment (I will later tonight), but I am very suspicious of Kain's asking for a vote count. That, plus his previous post in which he FOSes and almost votes LML, makes me think he's a scum trying to see if he can jump on the LML bandwagon without getting "found out." That, plus his earlier tautologies (dammit Flay! That was the word I was looking for
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
), makes me want to
Vote: Kain
.
ENYH promised to explain more as to why he feels the way he does later that night. He made that post last night around 10pm-11 MST last night May21. Why does he not bring forth the evidence and moreover why does he not do it last night(May 21) like he said he would? Why is there is no evidence….is it because there really isn’t any? As for me asking for a vote count I am very guilty sometimes of not reading everything new that’s been posted so I missed the vote count on page two. I thought I was doing everyone a favor for asking for a vote count on page two. And the lesson learned is don’t ask for vote counts because people will jump on you for that…..weird huh? Well at least Mr. Flay speculated correctly that I had not seen it( the vote count posted by the mod) Anyway I get off the topic. Let me explain why I FOS LML and did not vote him.
Kain wrote:In pondering the points( especially the ones that Mr. Flay has brought up) I am now going to
FOS
you LML. I'm not voting for you right now because I want to hear your defense to everything Mr. Flay has brought against you so far.
As you all can see by reading Mr. Flay’s numerous points that he has made against LML that I had every good reason to believe that LML could be scum as Mr. Flay has suggested. However it’s not kosher/proper to vote someone without allowing him/her a chance to defend him/herself. I did the right thing and I felt he did a very good job in defending himself hence I did not vote LML. If I had felt that his reasons that he provided to support himself against Mr. Flay’s accusations were provably weak I would have said so and voted for him. Okay moving on to my next part of this huge explanation.
Now that having all been explained about why I did what I did with LML I find myself justified in saying
Kain wrote:Hmm some very interesting posts have been made today. EYNH I find your post to be extremely scummy. First I did expain as to why I was FOS and not changing my vote. Go read page 1 and 2( especially two). Your reasoning for voting for me is weak. I
FOS
You for what appears to me to be you trying to start a bandwagon based on poor logic and faulty reasoning. Everything you said against me could very easily be argued the totally opposite way that you have thus far argued them.
As you all can see it was reasonable to FOS him because he voted for me based on what I did with LML even though my reasoning for FOSing LML was logical. It’s rather stupid to vote for someone who votes for you as a revenge statement(unless you have sufficient logical evidence to support yourself) so I didn’t do that. I didn’t feel that ENYH was definitely scum but I FOSed him with justifiably reasoning. So this brings me back now to your post Tamuz.
Tamuz wrote:Wow Kain... a retaliatory suspicion when one votes you. That FOS on EYNH makes me very suspicious of you, you have no reason to fling accusations back into his face, just because he voted for you. His reason may be weak, but your is even weaker because it is based on his weak reason. Your constructing buildings on someone else's glass mountain.
Oh, and Kain
Unofficial Vote Count, just for you:
Vote Count
2 - Kain (EYNH, Tamuz)
1 - Mr. Flay (LML)
1 - Stam (Kain)
3 - LML (Mr. Flay, Stam, Big_k)
Takes 4 to lynch.
Vote:Kain
So Tamuz do you care to explain now how my FOS on EYNH wasn’t logical and justifiable? Really please do. If you don’t understand my reasoning in this post then I highly suggest rereading what everyone has said….maybe you’ll see where I’m coming from then.
Also how is my reasoning built on his reasoning as you have claimed in your post that I have now quoted or partially quoted twice? I’m just not seeing how my reasoning is built on his. I just said that his points were weak because they could very well be argued the opposite way as they have thus far been argued. I did not vote for him because what he said did not construct in my opinion enough information for me to justifiable vote for him; it did give me grounds to question him and FOS him for it.
So I think I’ve said enough on the topic- So feel free to explain yourself now Tamuz. After all everyone has the right( or should be given it) to explain themselves after they’ve said something. So please do speak up. I really hope that all made sense to everyone.
Currently Modding " CALIFORNIA VENTURA MORMON MISSIONARY MAFIA." Will the Mormons baptize everyone? Or will the town chase them out first? Tune in to find out. Mini 372 in Coney Island.