@Town
Sorry. I was away from this game so I
Claim: Guy who did not read this game since page 3
So I'll give my responses.
Neto 67: Meh so basically everyone is cleared since it's too early to tell and not enough information is given about them. That makes for poor discussion for the early game.
Sotty7: AtE is appeal to emotion. Basically it's when you use emotion on the town to prove a point rather then typical evidence.
Also part of townie play is to sift through the information between the town tells and the scum tells. If you are hunting scum your first instinct shouldn't automatically assume the actions are scummy. You weigh the time, the context and the content of the posts with the rest of the discussion and consider all the possibilities you can. Then you press on it.
If we do have a jester in this game, then that changes perspective of the person's posts (aka we cannot determine strong scum links just based on his play alone.)
BM 72: Lol you just sarcasticly soft claimed British Mafia Goon. Do they kill with hot scalding English tea and choke people with biscuits? Talk about flavour text (literal flavour, with some cream to balance out the tea)
Page 4-5: What is proxy voting? Why isn't just regular voting just as effective. :< Everyone just let BM lead them, but I guess the mind set was still in the RVS so it's not that serious. It led into the early parts of Page 6 x.x.
BM 140: Agreed. Here we start!
BM 154: Why is trying to end the RVS a scum-tell?
BM 157: So depending on the person, you attack the person who follows with the proxy vote or the person who attacks the idea of proxy voting. That basically leaves only the people who ignored your proxy voting...
That is a broad amount of people to attack and consider scummy BM, it leaves a lot of people wide open to attack and you can use your two arguments on anyone in particular. Scum-BM would be very powerful here.
CSL 162: Wait wut... OMGUS indirectly means chainsaw attack? o-o.
Neto 167: Note the link between Neto and Maekumi.
BM 172: I'm unloved here BM.
CSL 186: Vote hopping isn't scummy if BM is the one who's leading/attacking both bandwagons at the same time. >>
BM 188: I have meta evidence where vote hopping can be considered scummy. The game is ongoing though but it's in my wiki. I'll give you a hint, the flavor text is quite self inflicting. (Mod if that's too much then delete this line)
But considering the scenario it can be both null/scummy to me. Here it's null since you are leading the main attacks.
Page 9: What... you guys are unvoting due to "it's too early to before deadline" ?
Neto 215: You are fretting over a small votes. If her reactions turn out to be townie, then the votes come off. If they turn out scummy they stay. Town will prevent quick lynches before this will happen. If a quick lynch does happen, you can bet scum had a hand in running it and its more beneficial to analyze it to catch easy scum.
Neto 227:
1. His style screams his normal meta. I seen it before (game ongoing though so can't link). The best thing is to do two things: be critical of his posts and be critical of the people's reactions. BM earned his signature that scum is afraid of him for a reason since his analysis and scum hunting nose is usually correct.
2. We are out of the RVS are we not? Normal votes would have had the same effect.
3. Role fishing? o-o This is a normal setup is it not? There isn't some crazy role to clarify since he has so much experience in the game.
4. I don't think we can answer 4 ourselves honestly without some Bias. Check my wiki or ask BM/Nik/Zach/Jason for their metas on me.
Haylen 231: Real DK? Did everyone just ignore that? I assume it's fake considering Zach updated the votes and no kill yet.
