yellowbunny wrote:Hito wrote:
To be quite frank, YB, I asked for bullet points specifically to give you a chance to state a case for BM outside of "I don't like him/he's wagoning me" and what you provided only bolstered BM's accusations. Your bullet points are basicially 1.) BM is spastic and 2.) BM is a jerk. I'm not convinced either of those are scumtells.
I've said it before and I'll stand by it - while BM's style is quite unlike mine, I very much appreciate it for increasing the tempo and eliciting unlikely responses. You can dislike his style all you want but it is not, not, not a clear indicator of scum, no matter how annoying it may be.
I understand your point about his playstyle. And, fwiw, although I think what he did with CSL is inappropriate, I don't have a problem with BM the player -- I think he's amusing, and has been leading this game around by a leash (which takes considerable skill).
Lol, whats with all the flattery tonight? You KNOW it gets you everywhere! xD
YB wrote:
Anyway, thinking about what you said, I don't think you can legitimately dismiss my point 1 by saying it boils down to BM being spastic. Being wishy-washy is a known scum tell.
INCORRECT, INCORRECT, INCORRECT. Anyone who told you that "being wishy-washy" was a scumtell, should be strung up irl. It's one of the few strong towntells left these days...
YB wrote:
I still have to disagree with you on your argument with my point 2. To me, it just does not make ANY sense that a town aligned player would behave in that manner - it seems like the entire point of his "relationship" posts were designed to upset CSL, not scumhunt.
Haha, why in the HELL would CSL be upset? I dont think suggesting he might be in a relationship with a member of the opposite sex who he was buddying like stink, is really something he'd be offended about. It's only Maemuki who appeared to have a problem with it-and thats not too surprising, given she wasnt participating in the buddying.
YB wrote:
I still think BM is a good candidate for a lynch today. I agree that its not a slam dunk case, but I think its reasonable simply for lack of more compelling cases. Likewise, I think that the case Kitty put forward is equally reasonable, so I'd be just as satisfied with a ck lynch today. (I'd support a Mae lynch, but I'd prefer to see BM or CK.)
Such short deadlines in such an active game is ridiculous. But it does keep things fresh, which i do like.
I'm not aware of any real scumminess from Ckool, so i will iso him.
YB wrote:
@BM: Your post makes me giggle - you are funny.
YB wrote:
BM wrote:
Changing opinions is a maaassive towntell btw. Unless your accusation is that i'm looking "too townie"?
And I see you are also anti-wiki,
That's true. The wiki is hideously out of date. Ask Yos.
How did you know?
YB wrote:
but that's okay, cuz I think town can read, and see that it is, in fact, a scum tell. Btw, what motivation does town have to pretend that a scum tell is a town tell? /ponders
Haha, rather than feeding people utter BS, how about you ask around? This applies to everyone. Ask as many experienced players as you can whether being openly wishy-washy is a towntell or a scumtell, and i guarantee you that anyone worth their salt in mafia will tell you the same as i have.
Your last question hits the nail on the head. I think that 98% of players who are Mafia will try and play as honestly as possible as far as they can, on things that can be outright proven or disproven.
Please can i direct your attention to Appenine Mafia, in the New York forum. It's just finished, and we had a discussion like this earlier in that game. Once again, i was under attack for "wishy-washiness", and my stance was the same. It is a towntell. Needless to say, i was town there too.
It's fairly easy to understand why. The vast majority of scumbags-with the possible exception of vets, will play for consistency points, because, for a long time, people DID follow the wiki, and believed that any inconsistency regarding their suspicions would be viewed as scummy. It's for this reason too, that tunnel-visioning was often exploited by scum, in order to let them cruise through the game, without having to answer for much. See Ready Salted Mafia, also in the New York forum, for an example of BM-scum doing this, and getting to a 3 person endgame, only to be hammered by the remaining player. That was a long time ago though, and things have moved on since then.
Being openly inconsistent always attracts attention, and scum dont want lots of attention on them. Especially when they are naturally scummy-seeming players.
But, as i said, don't just take this from me. Ask Yosarian2/ MeMe/ Fonzie.
Jason wrote:
Sorry to ask, but could someone please tell me what 'white knighting' means.
I'm glad i didnt miss this. Seeing as YB didnt ask, i will.
Jason, why are you "sorry to ask"?
BM