Open 172 - Mini Love - GAME OVER!

[Khamisa]

Netlava: I was not subtly defending Yankee; I was stating my opinion on extending the RVS. Also, I think if someone who didn't understand mafia looked at one of these games, they'd see the fun in the RVS, but they'd have to understand to get why the actual gameplay is fun. I don't see why anyone wouldn't want to have the common, understandable fun in the RVS continue longer.

The "No change" VOTE COUNT

Khamisa (3): Netlava, dramonic, Head_Honcho
Yankee (2): Locke Lamora, Nikanor
animorpherv1 (1): Looker
dramonic (1): Snow_Bunny
Locke Lamora (1): Slepz
Slepz (1): Vino
Vino (1): Khamisa
Netlava (1): Yankee

Not Voting (1): animorpherv1

With 12 Alive, 7 is needed to lynch.
Deadline is October 20th.

[dramonic]

I dont think we're talking about the same links.

[Yankee]

What happened to everyone, noone is posting... And so I wont be a hypocrite, i dont believe Khasima is a mafia just because of that one post. I think you guys looked into it too much, Netlava is still at the top of my list....

[Looker]

sigh

unvote
vote slepz

[Snow_Bunny]

I think we've discussed a lot about the upcoming days and we're forgetting today.

[Nikanor]

Yankee needs to be lynched.

[Yankee]

Yankee needs to be lynched.

Why is that?

[Looker]

No, Slepz needs to come back first.

[Nikanor]

Yankee needs to be lynched.

Why is that?

Because I said so.
Also, you've been scummy, but that really isn't as important as my first argument.

Slepz needs to come back

Agreed.

[Vino]

I still have a bunch of unanswered questions:

@dramonic:

Then dramonic, do you think that Yankee's vote was extending the RVS or not? Either you think Yankee did it and Khamisa was defending him, or you think Yankee didn't do it but Khamisa was defending him anyway, which is it?

@Head_Honcho:

So then do you think that Netlava is right and Khamisa and Yankee have some kind of link, as that one single line post seems to indicate?

@Snow_Bunny:

This post wasn't rhetorical.

[dramonic]

Yankee wasn't extending the RVS in my opinion, since I don't consider at that point we were out of RVS yet.

[molestargazer]

Slepz has been prodded.

The rules have been updated. Rule 10-3 has been added:

10-3. If I have to prod you twice, if you are inactive a third time you will be replaced.

[Locke Lamora]

You vote for Nik in the RVS, it's all very jokey, you continue to make posts like this:

*adopts fetal position*

Nik cannot be scum... it's counter-nature

Later he defends you, so we get:

thank you Nik. ^_^

Then, in response to the plan, you say:

It's a good plan in essence, but it's pretty risky.

That's not even true. You don't think it's a good plan at all. Do you doubt Nik's motives at all? My feeling from your interactions is that you actually believe he can't be scum, because you certainly don't seem to be considering the possibility.

[Nikanor]

Later he defends you, so we get:

Actually, I didn't defend him. I answered a question for him, that being the difference in definition of two words.

[animorpherv1]

Then, in response to the plan, you say:

It's a good plan in essence, but it's pretty risky.

That's not even true. You don't think it's a good plan at all. Do you doubt Nik's motives at all? My feeling from your interactions is that you actually believe he can't be scum, because you certainly don't seem to be considering the possibility.

In my opinion, this part is personal, as to if someone sees Nikanor's plan as working or not, and you really shouldn't hold it against someone.

Looker, please give reasons with your vote (even though now we know it's because slepz isn't here, I have warned you and next time I will consider you scum).

[animorpherv1]

Then, in response to the plan, you say:

It's a good plan in essence, but it's pretty risky.

That's not even true. You don't think it's a good plan at all. Do you doubt Nik's motives at all? My feeling from your interactions is that you actually believe he can't be scum, because you certainly don't seem to be considering the possibility.

In my opinion, this part is personal, as to if someone sees Nikanor's plan as working or not, and you really shouldn't hold it against someone.

Looker, please give reasons with your vote (even though now we know it's because slepz isn't here, I have warned you and next time I will consider you scum).

[animorpherv1]

Double post ftw!

[dramonic]

The first post was joking, the second was thanks for service rendered (giving the definitions in my absense), the third is an opinion,

Of course Nik could be scum, he just hasn't done anything to ping my scumdar yet. His plan seems towndriven, even if its not good

[Snow_Bunny]

I remember once in a large theme game (I was scum), where the town proposed a major name claim. I and some partners immediately stood up and said that it was no beneficial for town and started fighting against it, with the argument that it would help scum more than town. We obviously didn't want it because it would be a bad thing for us. And I think that's the same reason some players don't want that.

Then you think all of the people who opposed it are scummy?

No, I'm just saying that there could be scum in the people who opposed it, unlike the general reaction that the claim will benefit scum.

I like how you're making an argument based on an anecdote from another game that may or may not apply to us. Would you like to join us in Mini Love 172 and make an argument specific to our current situation?

What current situation? I gave my opinion about the claiming part, which I believe was the current situation.

[Looker]

I'm still confused as to warnings and threats and how to deal with them. Should I care?

[Head_Honcho]

lol ultimatum

Vino, that's not even the issue. The issue is that you think all of his points are valid and are attacking him for HAVING TOO MANY OF THEM. Which boils down to you attacking him for scumhunting.

I would probably vote vino for that but I would actually be very okay with a looker lynch today.

I don't necessarily think that they have any kind of link, I just think it was weird how you jumped on netlava for a post full of 'valid' points directed at somebody else.

[dramonic]

I spy with my little eye something begin with big fat scum-coaching!

[dramonic]

unvote
Vote: Looker

[Netlava]

Could be tunnel vision, but I find Yankee kind of scummy also.

[Nikanor]

What we need right now is a quickly-built bandwagon with absolutely no reasoning whatsoever.

Unvote. Vote: Looker.