Iguana wrote:Yes, it brings more tells then "vote <player> for <joke>"
But this is how bandwagons start. How else can they form? Someone be like "Oh, vote so-an-so, everyone else should too"? That's not usually how it works, at the beginning at least.
Nikanor wrote:I was completely serious. It looks like false reasoning for a distancing vote, as I said before
QFT. Looking at the list and the games SB is in, she actually should have recognized a few people here.
yabbaguy wrote:Voting people you like/recognize = fail reason even for a random vote. >_>
I didn't know there were correct reasons to
random
vote. Could you give some examples?
Head_Honcho wrote:FoS: Nikanor
BACKPEDALING ON LAST PERSON TO GET TEN POSTS POLICY
That policy was never fair in the first place to flakers in replacements. He obviously posted before he thought.
Also, is backpedaling on a backpedal a forward-pedal? I'm so confused.
Blastinus wrote:Geez, I make one statement and everybody's mocking me left and right.
Welcome to Mafia! The one game show where saying one thing could get you into SO much trouble!
Nikanor wrote:Single votes are anti-town.
QFL. (Quoted for Lies)
WarWound wrote:hy are we gonna pwn nikanor?
sr cuz we s00pr 1337.
yabbaguy wrote:That said, I find it interesting how Nik's really screwing around this game, with an emote practically every first line he posts.
QFT.
zwetschenwasser wrote:I think we may have gotten someone less rational than me!
I thought I smelled the world exploding.
foilist13 wrote:There are several players following the same pattern as 12kb. Why is he a more logical choice for a bandwagon than you?
I partially agree with you, but could you name some examples of people?
The reason for this is there are differences between those people and 12keyblade.
On that note,
Vote: 12keyblade
because I get the feeling that he could add a lot more input then what he is currently doing.