....Haylen wrote:PS. I dont have penis envy.
I also dont want anal.
This warranted a need for me to publicly announce.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Why the Nikanor vote?
Cop Out.jasonT1981 wrote:I believe they are our best chance at hitting scum right now yes.Sotty7 wrote:
Jason: Do you think Hito is scum with BM?
Cop out? how... I am asked do I think you both are scum...Battle Mage wrote:Cop Out.jasonT1981 wrote:I believe they are our best chance at hitting scum right now yes.Sotty7 wrote:
Jason: Do you think Hito is scum with BM?
PS: This is not a breadcrumb.
I also don't have penis envy. >.>
BM
Which to me is ringing true. More scumhunting, less defensiveness. You are claimed PR, if you are town I don't understand why you aren't scum hunting.Vi wrote:Do you find anyone suspicious, or are you resting on your Tracker claim to get through the Day?
I don't actually see where your conclusions are, but anyway.DTMaster 856 wrote:@Vi/Sotty/BM
Recall the meta discussion me and Haylen had. I conceded since she hasn't posted in other games through post searching when she could have at least contributed something here.
Do you agree/disagree with my conclusions that Haylen is telling the truth?
Wait what???DTMaster wrote:
But here is my answer:
Jason's vote on hito reads as weak OMGUS. Hito's vote reads as weak reasoning supported by "I was trying to see your reaction: defence. The latter is better supported. The former is lacking.
My vote reads as nothing but OMGUS? when I had already outlined my full reasons in post 797.. and again in 842.. you say you have not read them yet claim my reason is OMGUS?DTMaster wrote:@Jason
842: At the time I didn't think I got a chance to read through your full argument. But a good summary helps.
That's already happened...Vi wrote: I'm pretty sure Haylen's telling the truth about being sick, unless she wants to be the subject of the next big forum drama.
I like Mastin's posts because even though they are massive, they are not very dense because of the amount of one-liners, and because he USES QUOTES EFFECTIVELY, something other players in this game seem to have trouble doing.DTM wrote:Issue though: Nikanor likes playing with Mastin, therefore he is a text wall masochist. I smell favoritism from Kitty for a Kitty/Nik scum team or Kitty buddying. (is serious here)
Basically, my top two suspects are DTM and hito. I've said my reason(s?) for suspecting DTM. I'm suspicious of hito for his dubious jason vote.Maemuki wrote:Maemuki would like for you to say who you suspect. Why? Because I didn't see them. >.<
Even though I said that twice? *le sigh* I'm not really one to talk, but still...Nikanor wrote:Sorry Maemuki, I forgot, haha.
Why do you ignore them?If I were to provide a third, it would probably be yellowbunny, but it's not easy to get a read from her when she follows DTM's posting style (i.e. I ignore most of it).
I now know whoMaemuki will probably be dead tonight, but if not, I'll be pretty suspicious of her.
Because I don't like looking back and finding the posts to which they are referring when DTM and yellowbunny post. Take DTM's 856, for example.Mae wrote:Why do you ignore them?
I had to look back and find post 817 to see what DTM was talking about. When he does that ten times in one post, I start to feel a tinge of apathy creeping up my spine. Sure, it's easier for DTM to post like that, but it makes it a hell of a lot more difficult on other people.DTM's 856 wrote:@Kitty
Eww 817: Get better.
Issue though: Nikanor likes playing with Mastin, therefore he is a text wall masochist. I smell favoritism from Kitty for a Kitty/Nik scum team or Kitty buddying. (is serious here)
Mae wrote:Aside from that, if Sotty didn't have meta evidence, would Jason be your third option for scum?
I agree.hitogoroshi Post 863 wrote:(Though if that's true, Jason, I'd recommend trying to change that fact about yourself. Attacking your attacker instead of pro-actively hunting is anti-town behavior, regardless of your alignment.)
Just on my say so?Maemuki Post 865 wrote:...ok, Sotty. If you say so...I'm inclined to believe Jason is town
Glad I wasn't the only one that felt like this. It is a really annoying post style.Nikanor Post 868 wrote:Because I don't like looking back and finding the posts to which they are referring when DTM and yellowbunny post. Take DTM's 856, for example.Mae wrote:Why do you ignore them?I had to look back and find post 817 to see what DTM was talking about. When he does that ten times in one post, I start to feel a tinge of apathy creeping up my spine. Sure, it's easier for DTM to post like that, but it makes it a hell of a lot more difficult on other people.DTM's 856 wrote:@Kitty
Eww 817: Get better.
Issue though: Nikanor likes playing with Mastin, therefore he is a text wall masochist. I smell favoritism from Kitty for a Kitty/Nik scum team or Kitty buddying. (is serious here)
I don't follow your reasoning here. Firstly, unless I'm misremembering/can't find where he wrote it, I don't think DT said he was the BEST lynch...he said he was a good lynch. And if DT's behavior is "suspicious" and "bizzare", how is his lynch not better than, say, a Jason lynch (whom you say you have meta to support him being town)?Sotty wrote:I actually very much agree with this. It equates to not actively scum hunting almost. I don't understand it and I don't agree with his reasoning that he is the best lynch today if we can't decide. I think a BM, Yellow or even Jason lynch would gives us more info than a DTMaster lynch. His actions are bizarre.Nikanor wrote:Well I'm suspicious of DTM for claiming VT and self-voting an hour before deadline and directly after BM said that self-voting is townie. The fact that his vote is still on himself isn't earning him any points, either.Vi wrote: And there's nobody else you're suspicious of...?
Not following you here. Clarify please?DTM wrote: Issue though: Nikanor likes playing with Mastin, therefore he is a text wall masochist. I smell favoritism from Kitty for a Kitty/Nik scum team or Kitty buddying. (is serious here)
Damnit, Nikanor! So you are saying I could have commited the most henious grammatical crimes in those posts, and you never would have noticed! /shakes fistNikanor wrote:Because I don't like looking back and finding the posts to which they are referring when DTM and yellowbunny post. Take DTM's 856, for example.
Firstly, I did not say "only scum use reasons to justifiy their vote", I said, "scum always (or at least, almost always) justify their votes because they primarily vote to start bandwagons." "If scum = justify votes"jasonT1981 wrote:Hito... you said only scum use reasons to justify their vote... but then went on a tirade trying to justify your vote in your very next post.. could you explain that please, does that not, by your own definition make you scum?
You're misinterpreting - I was going to modify that with "deliberately", but with your medication I'll give the benefit of the doubt - the meaning of justify. As I said extremely clearly in the mentioned post, scum like to justify their votes with reasons for the purpose of forming a bandwagon. I mentioned the fact that you're at L-4 because it, in conjunction with my lack of a call to arms, showed explicitly that my vote was not placed on you to form a bandwagon. Complete opposite concepts, and to link them by poorly defining the word "justify" is kind of asinine.
And could you please tell me why a vote without rationale is "more scummier"? I have posted my reasons why I believe it is a null tell.