You did say you thought all of his points were valid, and you also said "either he's reading into it way too much, or he's trying to frame someone", which you're right is not explicitly saying he is scummy, you are basically trying to discredit him without pushing a case, which is what struck me as scummy originally. I did not respond to your response because you said I was twisting it as you say now, whereas I know I was merely inferring your motives.Vino wrote:Oh what? I responded to that way back when and you never even dignified it with a reply. I never said he was scummy, I just said that his points were reaching. I also never said he had "too many valid points," I said that he was reading into it too much. It was barely an attack but an observation. You're taking my argument and twisting it into something it's not. Surely you have something else on your list of things worth voting me for.
I think this needs a bit of explanation.dramonic wrote:It does narrow the field of scum, yes. But it does so even if the lovers die. Scum won't kill the lovers before much later, it's basic tactic. The longer lovers are alive, the longer scum is in control.
animorpherv1 wrote:I think this needs a bit of explanation.dramonic wrote:It does narrow the field of scum, yes. But it does so even if the lovers die. Scum won't kill the lovers before much later, it's basic tactic. The longer lovers are alive, the longer scum is in control.
mod: If a lover dies, and a doctor protects the other lover, what happens?
The other lover still dies.
The Doc role PM states that he can protect someone from being KILLED - not from committing suicide.
I wouldn't expect you to support it, since you're his lover and want to survive, but it's not just scum and coward. Numbers point at it as optimal.Head_Honcho wrote:Yankee is a lynch for scum and cowards. The man himself is the main supporter of it.
OR it was just an observation and you're reading into it too much, same way Netlava read into Khamisa too much.Head_Honcho wrote:You did say you thought all of his points were valid, and you also said "either he's reading into it way too much, or he's trying to frame someone", which you're right is not explicitly saying he is scummy, you are basically trying to discredit him without pushing a case, which is what struck me as scummy originally. I did not respond to your response because you said I was twisting it as you say now, whereas I know I was merely inferring your motives.Vino wrote:Oh what? I responded to that way back when and you never even dignified it with a reply. I never said he was scummy, I just said that his points were reaching. I also never said he had "too many valid points," I said that he was reading into it too much. It was barely an attack but an observation. You're taking my argument and twisting it into something it's not. Surely you have something else on your list of things worth voting me for.
H_H wrote:Yankee is a lynch for scum and cowards. The man himself is the main supporter of it.
So there are three people voting Yankee right now, one of which is a lover, eh? *Rubs chin*Vote count wrote: Yankee (3): Khamisa, dramonic, Locke Lamora
Now I wonder what gave you that idea?Head_Honcho wrote:He looks to me like somebody who knows everyone's roles.
