Kreirov, the main reason is because I dislike SCoug's position's play, rather than SCoug's play itself. I felt that that slot was scummy, but had those thoughts confirmed when SCoug, who I know as an excellent player, came in and voted lynchbait, voted poorly in the MSH/Spyrex logic argument and then made grandiose noises about spotting the obvious OMGUS from Nikanor.
But you also should know better, especially as you've seen WarWound's play before. Was your vote primarily a policy vote, or did you feel WW was scummy?
Scoug wrote:WarWound wasn't doing anything to further the game. He had been allowed lots of opportunity to help us, but he wanted to sit there and whine. That I don't have a meta favoring new players is not scummy. I play hardball.
SCoug wrote:At this point I'm pretty convinced that WarWound is scum.
Yes, we understand that a lot of the people on the site from whence you came don't have a very high intelligence level. That does not give you the right to opt out of scumhunting because you're afraid of a mislynch. Town doesn't lose if they mislynch once (unless there are five- and six-player games that I don't know about). Town loses if they mislynch too many times. You've also been throwing a lot of ad hominem attacks and otherwise useless content.
Vote: WarWound
In the first quote it looks like you're saying you voted WW because even if he's a newb, he wasn't really helping the town and that's how you roll. In the second quote, made when you first voted him, you seem convinced he was scum based on his actions.
Was your vote for WW a policy vote for an unhelpful new player or because you think you've genuinely found scum?
I'm old now.