![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
I resent that.
- I'm sorry I'm not commenting much, but I don't really have much to say. I haven't read the books, know absolutely nothing of who any of these characters are, and my role has no sort of investigative ability, so I'm stumped here. All I can do is follow my instincts on who I feel is the right choice to vote.Mr. Flay wrote:You've been pretty much a voter and not a commenter, which in a game with as many scum groups as this one is easy to read as scum/SK behavior (as long as we're not aiming at one of your team, you don't care who you vote for).
You voted for me when most everyone else thought Pooky had Peachy dead to rights, and then "enjoyed" the response to that bizarre behavior "immensely".
Your behavior at the news of Satan's death was... nonplussed, to say the least.
You say you haven't read the book, but you've been unwilling/unable to find it and read it in order to participate more fully.
You've been cozying up to our only outed investigator, in multiple posts.
As we've been theorizing, a "good vibe" from Pooky doesn't necessarily mean you're on the side of the town. You could be working for Armageddon.
Man, what a load of crap. Nice timing with the attack too, as you won't be answering for a while.Blackberry wrote: -- After reading back, through pages 3-6 or something along those lines. It appears Olio never commented on the vote on Gaspode who turned out to be a horseman. I find it odd that he completly ignored the matter and personally appear it to be very scummy. Olio also said "After a bit of thinking I agree with..." and changed your vote to mempuff. I personally think only scum would take a bit of thinking to reconsider their actions.