@MordyS - You said you had a strong town read on Gammagooey. It seems as though your opinions with with convenience.
Ok, questions asked of me.
peanutman wrote:@Foilist, why did you say :
foilist13 wrote:It now seems as though this is realistically between MordyS and Archaebob, and I am inclined to choose MordyS.
Before that point, I had been wanting to lynch either Cruelty, AGM, or possibly you, but your claim has basically cleared you and AGM for the day. That leaves Cruelty, however he had responded better to my arguments than I was really willing to admit, and this new debate between Archaebob and MordyS looked as though it would be extremely fruitful, and so it has.
Cruelty wrote:foilist13 wrote:
I still like the Cruelty lynch, and if we buy what Peanut is saying, I think that his is best by far.
Why? If peanut is the cop then half the case against me (that peanut and I didn't address each other day 1) goes away. And you're left with your bunch of dubious points and OMGUS.
A significant portion of your defense was based on lynching Peanut instead, and in absence of that lynching you would be a better option, and would yield more information. I'm not voting you anymore, so I really don't want to get into a debate about how good of a lynch you really would be unless we start seriously considering you. Is that fair?
Sanjay wrote:foilist13 wrote:
It now seems as though this is realistically between MordyS and Archaebob, and I am inclined to choose MordyS.
How is this justification for a vote in this town?
Despite the vast amounts of content in this thread, or rather because of it, it has become exceedingly hard to sift through posts and find scum slips. There are not a lot of people today who look particularly scummy, although that is changing. I still like the vote, and plan on sticking by it for the present.
MordyS wrote:foilist13 wrote:
It now seems as though this is realistically between MordyS and Archaebob, and I am inclined to choose MordyS.
How is this even true? There was one vote on me. How is this realistically between me and Archaebob? There isn't a single scummy thing I've done. The one case against me that you agree with turns out to be factually incorrect. This is the reason why I wanted to lynch you yesterday -- awful, awful, awful play.
Yeah, whatever. Clearly there are scummy things you've done, more so than any other player. I'd list them, but I'd essentially be quoting Archaebob, so I won't until I have something new to add. The bottom line is he's right. As for factually incorrect, that part of the case is no longer what I'm basing my vote on, but I still haven't checked it out for myself.
Cruelty's post then is pretty much just calling me stupid, so yeah, ok whatever.
Peanut wrote:Foilist, as you are debating whether Mordy or Archae is the better lynch, you use this type of argument? Really? I know it's only one of your points but you're blindly (without checking) using one of the candidate's argument, admittedly, as evidence against the other. Really didn't give Mordy much of a chance on that point.
Yes, I am absolutely comfortable with accepting a factual argument as true until I check it. That does not mean I am not going to check it, that means I haven't checked it yet. I think lying is stupid, and potentially scummy, so I expect people not to do it, however I still will check up on facts.
[quote="MordyS]OMG LOL. Do you realize I attacked archaebob first? Are you even following the fucking thread?[/quote]
OMGUS has been a pretty prevalent part of your argument since he attacked you. Shockingly it is possible to add OMGUS to an argument after you've already voted.
Ok, if I missed anything point it out to me, but I think I've answered everything directed at me.
"If you are going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh. Otherwise they'll kill you."
