Almaster-1-Peabody
rewq455-1-Diamondilium
Why is that true?SolemnJ wrote:You are scum. Only scum says "Kill: Peabody" and nothing else. DIE.AlmasterGM wrote:Kill: Peabody.
vote Almaster
Stupid RVS...
This post struck me as a little bit odd. I don't know if its your playing style or whatever, but this post just looks unnecessary. You said you were 'just kidding' about the less lurkish-ness and the higher post count. So really, why were you posting this? Also, why were you debating posting this in your mind?llamaeatataco wrote:I thought about not posting this, but It might make me seem less lurkish later on to have a higher post count (jk): Tacos are definitely a good nutritional choice for llamas. You can put pretty much anything IN the taco, and The taco itself is not bad for them.
---
On a more serious note, I'm probably not going to wall of text you people very often, but this game I'm experimenting with just trying to keep a PBPA of everyone saved on my computer and constantly updated. I'll probably get lazy and slack off though...
----
Also, because apparently we're supposed to give fake justifications for our votes here, I voted qax for not having a decent knowledge of a llama's nutritional needs, or the versatility of that fine food.
Who do you think that scum is? Aimlessly throwing around an accusation isn't helping. In fact, it seems odd to me that in response to the growing wagon on you was an accusation without a target.AlmasterGM wrote: Impressive. If there isn't at least 1 scum on this wagon right now I'd be shocked.
So, you get put to L-2 and all you have to say is that completely useless statement? Happy with my vote for now.AlmasterGM wrote:If there isn't at least 1 scum on this wagon right now I'd be shocked.
Yes, and uh...good? Do you feel that putting someone at L-3 is important and/or noteworthy?Tom wrote:Suffer, Suave, did you dudes know you were putting him at L-3 and L-2 respectively? And how did that make youfeeeeeel?
I lol'd.Suffer wrote:So, you get put to L-2 and all you have to say is that completely useless statement? Happy with my vote for now.AlmasterGM wrote:If there isn't at least 1 scum on this wagon right now I'd be shocked.
Well, I wanted to go after you or Suffer, but I thought that would be pretty ironic given my first post. That's not really an issue now, though.Who do you think that scum is? Aimlessly throwing around an accusation isn't helping. In fact, it seems odd to me that in response to the growing wagon on you was an accusation without a target.
First off, it's warrantless.AlmasterGM wrote:Your edgy sarcasm isn't very pro-town. Neither are your warentless voting and bad arguments.