You know what would get some activity back in to this game? A quagmire wagon.
Let's make this happen, guys and gals.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
I just want to get a wagon going. I picked Quagmire because he dropped in twice (and a third time in between these posts) to say 'Hey, I have nothing to say.' (Though especially after his latest post one could do say the same about Flare.)The Tracker wrote:Why are you so intent on Quagmire? Or was it a joke?
It was more an observation that a criticism. I'm not a heavy poster either, I just don't think I've ever been in a game where the page count wasn't, like, ten by now.angel 72 wrote:I'm not what you would class as a heavy poster, but I do dislike a game slowing down and discussion dying as it allows time to pass till the deadline. I have little to nothing to say since my last post though.
That's a fair answer. I disagree with you, you know, technically, because I don't think you necessarily have to have a defined moment where it's like, "Okay everyone, we are now officially out of the RVS". Goofing around is what pre-game and post-game is for, imo.Mindgamer 74 wrote:That's what you should do if you want to start a serious discussion, not attacking a RVS joke.
Well, you can speak for yourself there. I think I got some good stuff off of multiple people, and I'm anxious to see how it pans out as the game unfolds.hito 75 wrote:Yeah, I think a lot of people here are normally heavy posters but it's hard to be one when none of our initial leads seemed to stick and we're more or less back at square one.
I don't see how you got that. hito seems to be saying, and he can correct me if I'm wrong, that Quagmire is a good wagon because of his stubborn lack of contribution, despite posting three times.Flare 80 wrote:So you're saying I should begin suspecting people just because someone else said they are suspicious?
This sounds way too self-interested to me. In other words, "I don't want to give my opinion in case someone attacks me for it. I'll just let the other people in the game dictate my presence."Flare 82 wrote:Good point but I'm not gonna go attack someone cuz then someone will attack me for attacking someone
Why? Do you not agree with the decision she's made?The Tracker wrote: I'm very interested to hear Hoopla's reasoning, though...very interested indeed.
Not completely. Sure, I know Millers might want to claim early on to try and avoid the whole flipping guilty off of investigation thing, but there was really no pressure on her right now. *Shrugs* I don't know, maybe I'm reading too much into it but I tend to be wary of early claims.Nachomamma8 wrote:Why? Do you not agree with the decision she's made?The Tracker wrote: I'm very interested to hear Hoopla's reasoning, though...very interested indeed.
Do you think that she should've waited until she was under some pressure?The Tracker wrote: Not completely. Sure, I know Millers might want to claim early on to try and avoid the whole flipping guilty off of investigation thing, but there was really no pressure on her right now. *Shrugs* I don't know, maybe I'm reading too much into it but I tend to be wary of early claims.
Nailed it. There are quite a few others who I'd be almost as happy wagoning, but Quagmire rose to the top of the pack when it was my pick.RC [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2061599#2061599]85[/url] wrote: hito seems to be saying, and he can correct me if I'm wrong, that Quagmire is a good wagon because of his stubborn lack of contribution, despite posting three times.
Sometimes, as in not always.[/i][/quote]Wikia wrote:Sometimesan important part of a Miller role is that the player is not told this aspect of their role.