CSL wrote:Mod, in case of tie at deadline, is it a no lynch, or does the one who received the number first get lynched?
Right here Tajo.Sajin wrote:Ordinarily I would consider you scummy for voting anyone while claiming to have not read the thread. Your lucky malp is obv town.CSL wrote:@ Sajin: No. I was just posting some of my thoughts from the previous three pages, including this one. I will not accept a no lynch unless there really is no other way.
I will be busy tonight, so I'll try to get the first 15, or so, pages read by the time I go to bed.
You do realize the reason I am for a no lynch is to
1: get better odds.
2: To force your role to have an effect. Lynching today negates its effect entirely.
3: Because scum is being snarky and not killing or refusing to kill the fairly obvious town doctor. The only reason I would consider lynching today is because malp/you are obvious town in my eyes. However another interesting angle to explore would be that scum really does have no kill as dramonic was claiming. After all, there have only been 2 kills every day and we did have a double kill SK flip. Does anyone else have any thoughts on that? If they do not, then we have 2 lynches here. But I find it incredibly stupid that the onus is on town to lynch at 4 man, as that should never be the case. I argue this same point on #mafia all the time when the mafia wants to keep no lynching to get a draw. Its stupid. A 1 time tactical no kill to try to force missinformation? Awesome. Trying to artificially improve odds by refusing to kill until the draw is forced? Stupid. I find it even more stupid that we are being forced into lynching by the mod but thats talk for post game.
Please read the rest of the thread and get back here, CSL. In particular, you need to read the reason why malp has been protecting me: scum really had no motivation to seek clarification for what happened with the tracker/bodyguard death night. Malp and deathnote (dead SK) both claimed a protection on one of those 2 and therefore were CCing each other. With only 2 kills this was impossible with only one protection so I figured out what the wrong assumption here was and asked the mod about it. After the mod's interpertation about bodyguards was clarified, then it was obvious that malp could of actually protected the bodyguard and still had the bodyguard die and it was quite impossible for deathnote to have protected our tracker as it would of taken 3 kills to cause what we saw happen. Therefore he claimed mafia which made zero sense and we lynched him.
Thats my summary from my perspective but please go read it for yourself.
If he wants to lynch though we are lynching then. Lets start discussing.
@Manho- Who is scum and why?
@Tajo who is scum and why?
No lynch = Draw.Sajin wrote:1- ok why are you still voting when you have not read most of the thread and you have not responded to my reasons for wanting to no lynch? Which is, as I recall, your reasons for voting in the first place.
2- Additionally please tell me why I as scum would of bothered to get Malp and deathnote out of 1v1 with each other over the bodyguards death issue.
Point 1 is referencing post 1993.
Did you read any of my post? At all?CSL wrote:No lynch = Draw.Sajin wrote:1- ok why are you still voting when you have not read most of the thread and you have not responded to my reasons for wanting to no lynch? Which is, as I recall, your reasons for voting in the first place.
2- Additionally please tell me why I as scum would of bothered to get Malp and deathnote out of 1v1 with each other over the bodyguards death issue.
Point 1 is referencing post 1993.
You(scum) wanted to no lynch. Therefore, you are scum wanting to go for a draw.
Tajo, we can go after manho tomorrow if Sajin flips town. If we let Sajin go now, and kill manho today, Sajin will be scum who slipped under the radar, and win the game for his scummates.