SWN II: The Curse of the Nekomata (Game over!)

[kyle99]

Overreacting is not a scumtell.

Seriously, most of the 'heat' I seem to attract lately is due to me overreacting.

Unvote

I still have a scummy feel from the skyedoc wagon and I honestly thought it was sky himself.
Just have to take a third look.

Let's get this straight. You vote someone for being scummy, and people call you on it. After they call you on it, you proceed to unvote, despite the fact that you still think he's scum? I remember I did the exact same thing as scum in my very first game as mafia, and it doesn't work.

vote: DocPotter

[Nul]

vote: docpotter

for all the reasons stated before hand


i gues this is what you call jumping on a wagon

[Pomegranate]

Vote: Nul

. That was one bad vote. Kyle's wasn't good either, but at least he explained himself and didn't just say 'yeah im voting him cuz all the cool kids are'.

[Nul]

well all the reasons for voting docpotter was already stated
am i suppose to say

vote: docpotter
because he votes and then unvotes despite still believing the person he voted is a scum?

I really don't want to waste people's time by saying the same thing but in different words.

[kyle99]

Vote: Nul

. That was one bad vote. Kyle's wasn't good either, but at least he explained himself and didn't just say 'yeah im voting him cuz all the cool kids are'.

Exactly why isn't it a good wagon? Do you not think that that was scummy?

[DocPotter]

No Kyle I didn't. Try reading it again. I said I found something scummy about the wagon, and thought it was Skye. I still think it's a scummy wagon and am not sure if it's the wagoners or the target since Llama made some good points concerning it. Do I need to point out that Llama voted Skye as well at one stage?
There is a slight difference to what I said and what you claimed I said Kyle.

Whereas you and Nul appear to be wagon jumping pure and simple.

[kyle99]

well all the reasons for voting docpotter was already stated
am i suppose to say

vote: docpotter
because he votes and then unvotes despite still believing the person he voted is a scum?

I really don't want to waste people's time by saying the same thing but in different words.

1) Never assume that your just going to be wasting people's time by giving reasoning for your votes. Ever.

2) Saying that the reasons for voting someone have already been said by other people is lazy and shows a lack of an actual effort to scumhunt. At least attempt to scumhunt instead of just playing off other people's ideas.

3) Using accurate spelling and grammar will make people take you way more seriously.

[LlamaFluff]

No Kyle I didn't. Try reading it again. I said I found something scummy about the wagon, and thought it was Skye. I still think it's a scummy wagon and am not sure if it's the wagoners or the target since Llama made some good points concerning it.

Figured it out soon

Do I need to point out that Llama voted Skye as well at one stage?

What point are you trying to make here? Im just reading 'deflection deflection appeal to athority deflection'

Whereas you and Nul appear to be wagon jumping pure and simple.

Bandwagoning when done right is great for the town. This is being done right.

[Nul]

well all the reasons for voting docpotter was already stated
am i suppose to say

vote: docpotter
because he votes and then unvotes despite still believing the person he voted is a scum?

I really don't want to waste people's time by saying the same thing but in different words.

1) Never assume that your just going to be wasting people's time by giving reasoning for your votes. Ever.

2) Saying that the reasons for voting someone have already been said by other people is lazy and shows a lack of an actual effort to scumhunt. At least attempt to scumhunt instead of just playing off other people's ideas.

3) Using accurate spelling and grammar will make people take you way more seriously.

The objective of this game is finding out who the scum is (or at least the most suspicious person), and voting him out by convincing the other townies.
I don't see what's wrong with saying: "Yes, X has a point. Let's lynch Y."
Do I really need to evaluate on the reasoning of my votes when X has already given them?

"Yes, X has a point, let me repeat everything that X had stated but in different words just so I may appear less lazy than I actually am."

I don't care if people think I'm lazy, I just want to lynch the scum.

[Nul]

Just ignore my post, I just realised it was completely off-topic.

[DocPotter]

Really Llama. I'm just trying to be completely honest.

My point? Well if you found reason to vote Skye, is it unreasonable to assume that I did.

I'm going to place, or remove, my vote on whomever I think is the best target at the time and if something happens to make me change my mind then change it I will. Even if it's the next post, even if it's a ninja post.

All I can do is place it where I think best and be honest about the reason why.

[LlamaFluff]

My point? Well if you found reason to vote Skye, is it unreasonable to assume that I did.

Yeah that the borderline appeal to athority thing. It seems like you are using me doing something to justify you doing it.

I reaaaaalllly want ace to post though.

[sykedoc]

vote: docpotter

for all the reasons stated before hand


i gues this is what you call jumping on a wagon

Im sorry Nul, you just wreak of scum.

[Kairyuu]

V/LA until Friday due to school stuff.

[Fishythefish]

unvote, vote: DocPotter

(forgot to unvote in 261)

[StrangerCoug]

V/LA until Friday due to school stuff.

Noted.

Can't do any prods as I can't get my PM box open and the prodding application to work. Sorry.

[RayFrost]

Don't worry, I'm prodding myself.

[Parama]

vote: docpotter

for all the reasons stated before hand


i gues this is what you call jumping on a wagon

Im sorry Nul, you just wreak of

scum.

newb

Nul's coming off as a newb more than anything to me. Not that that means he isn't newbscum, just that his actions are more newbie mistakes than anything. He is coming off as rather scummy, especially the recent DocPotter wagon vote, I will admit.
Both Kyle only posted again once they were called out for lurking, and both posted pretty close together as well with a vote for the same person... my scumdar beeped at both of these things. But then again I know how kyle plays regardless of his alignment so this isn't too surprising of a response from him <_<

- Overreacting to 5 votes. Really?

FoS Anon

Overreacting is not a scumtell. Saying someone is overreacting is a scumtell.

Then why didn't you FoS me, since I was the one calling out syke for overreacting first? (yeah you probably missed my post but still <_<)
ani, even if you're not willing to vote, I'd like to hear your current suspicions.

[MafiaSSK]

vote: docpotter

for all the reasons stated before hand


i gues this is what you call jumping on a wagon

Im sorry Nul, you just wreak of

scum.

newb

Nul's coming off as a newb more than anything to me. Not that that means he isn't newbscum, just that his actions are more newbie mistakes than anything. He is coming off as rather scummy, especially the recent DocPotter wagon vote, I will admit.
Both Kyle only posted again once they were called out for lurking, and both posted pretty close together as well with a vote for the same person... my scumdar beeped at both of these things. But then again I know how kyle plays regardless of his alignment so this isn't too surprising of a response from him <_<

This post is scummy

[MafiaSSK]

Modérateur

, s'il vous plaît fixer mon prix.

[SaintKerrigan]

Unvote: RayFrost.

The vote isn't needed anymore.

Vote: DocPotter.

I don't like how he unvoted when some heat came his way.

[sykedoc]

vote: docpotter

for all the reasons stated before hand


i gues this is what you call jumping on a wagon

Im sorry Nul, you just wreak of

scum.

newb

Nul's coming off as a newb more than anything to me. Not that that means he isn't newbscum, just that his actions are more newbie mistakes than anything. He is coming off as rather scummy, especially the recent DocPotter wagon vote, I will admit.
Both Kyle only posted again once they were called out for lurking, and both posted pretty close together as well with a vote for the same person... my scumdar beeped at both of these things. But then again I know how kyle plays regardless of his alignment so this isn't too surprising of a response from him <_<[.quote]

This post is scummy

Clever clever boy. Your usage of quotes ofc.

[Sanhora]

Back this weekend (Friday afternoon counts as weekend to me, so I might be up to date then)

[LlamaFluff]

*glee*

PR people are using my (patent pending) quick-quotes

vote: docpotter

for all the reasons stated before hand


i gues this is what you call jumping on a wagon

Im sorry Nul, you just wreak of

scum.

newb

Nul's coming off as a newb more than anything to me. Not that that means he isn't newbscum, just that his actions are more newbie mistakes than anything. He is coming off as rather scummy, especially the recent DocPotter wagon vote, I will admit.

Why is the vote bad? This is also a little indecisive. You say he is newb, maybe newbscum, but newb, but his last post was scummy. What is it if you had to guess here? Is he scum or town?

Both Kyle only posted again once they were called out for lurking, and both posted pretty close together as well with a vote for the same person... my scumdar beeped at both of these things. But then again I know how kyle plays regardless of his alignment so this isn't too surprising of a response from him

Again, wishy-washy. Is he scum or town? Why?

- Overreacting to 5 votes. Really?

FoS Anon

Overreacting is not a scumtell. Saying someone is overreacting is a scumtell.

Then why didn't you FoS me, since I was the one calling out syke for overreacting first? (yeah you probably missed my post but still <_<)

Yeah I missed yours, should I be suspecting you too? This really is confusing... it might be one of the only times that I have had someone say "hey why didnt you think I was scummy?"

Are you scum and wanted me to point out that I was ignoring you so should be lynched if you are scum? I guess if its what you want...

FoS Parama

-"overreacting" tell
-Inability to take stances

Is DP scum? Why?
Is SD scum? Why?
Is kyle scum? Why?
Is Nul scum? Why?

**Note - The answer to any of these questions is not 'maybe' or 'I dont know'

[animorpherv1]

vote: docpotter
because he votes and then unvotes despite still believing the person he voted is a scum?

I really don't want to waste people's time by saying the same thing but in different words.

Yes you are. Some people find it scummy to vote without a good reason unless your in the RVS.

@Parama:

Depending on what the mod does with SSK breaking his PR, SSK. Doc isn't looking that good. Being a general nuisance (spelling?). However, I wouldn't say voting for someone because everyone else is is really scummy, so Nul is neutral to me ATM. I also think skye is being a bit of a pain.