Sorry, y'all, for the lack of my usual activity; this is my first time to do the collegian's spring break dance, so I didn't predict having less MS time on vacation than at school.
I'll probably be running on a post a day until I get back to school, but I promise to make them count.
Welcome, Nacho! I read through one of your games once a couple of months back (it was modded by Incognito). Nice.
I love the flavor.
Lawls wrote: What are your thoughts on Acomist's play so far?
One thing I've noticed about scum is that they're less motivated to sniff out the tendencies of other players. I know that to meta me (particularly in my early games) requires much time and effort. At this stage, I see Acosmist as town-invested. (Do fully expect it, though, after I've mentioned this scum-tactic, to be less likely for anyone to neglect meta-attention for much longer. Oh yes. I'm awesome.
)
Lawls wrote: What are your thoughts on my play so far
So far, not overly helpful (no offense.
). I feel that you weren't overly willing to contribute much early on, and when you did (via responses few and far between), the points you brought were somewhat weak and regurgitated. This nature so far has not been indicative of town-interest. Then it seemed as though your posting picked up, but only when pinched by a few other players. Currently I cannot decide if I think you're scum, or if you're an uncoordinated townie acting scummishly enough to provide an easier mislynch for the real scum. Quick! Do something to make up my mind for me!
Also, is English your primary language, by chance?
Cojin, on Lawls's play wrote: your play= Active lurking and filler. scummy at the least
You think so, Cojin? Because, while I'll give you the variables of Lawls's need to defend himself where you did not need to and his clear lack of content, he still has four posts more than you do (Lawls= 11, Cojin=7). Granted, your points seem to be a lot more thought-out, but you're still not contributing much.
Also, Cojin, would you please set an avatar? I think that's why your lack of posting has escaped me as long as it has. (I semi-consciously tally the pictures, and when too much time passes with an absense of an individual image, it sends off a red flag in my head.)
*awaits Havingfitz's "overly helpful" judgement.
Nacho wrote: Panacea's Day 1 activity is amazing; I love her for it.
... Someone
likes
my activity..? Or at the very least doesn't say first that I should be instalynched for it..? ... ... ... This makes me so happy.
If we find out you're scum and this is a ploy for Pan-points, I will be most displeased.
But thank you.
RayFrost wrote: For one, she's self-conscious as town. She's worried about every little mistake as if it would cause her to be struck down by a modkill... >.>"
Haha, Ray, you got a read on rl Pan!
Nacho wrote: the difference in meta is so painfully obvious that I'm pretty sure she's picked up on it by now.
... It is? You mean how Acosmist says I'm scattershot scum with Dadaist ramblings and Ray says I'm basket-case town?
Nacho wrote: ask yourself "If I were scum, would I make a post like this? Why/why not?".
Nacho is such a good SE. He answered Elementary's question beautifully. I would like to add a warning label to the above, though. Remembering my first game, I put a lot more stock in asking myself that question that I should have. The "would I, as scum" question provides the fibers for immensely counter-productive
WIFOM knots.
'Night, all!
Town: 2. 2.
Scum: 2. 1.