Mini 918 - A Hot, Steaming Bowl of Mafia - Game Over!

Col.Cathart · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:39 am

I propose:

Bio
Zach
RedCoyote
Locke
d3x

You know my claim already.

Locke Lamora · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:05 am

Agreed, claim is a good idea.

BH: I wouldn't have asked about the doctor if I didn't think it would help us win.

Bio Hazard · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:10 am

Townie

d3x · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:31 am

Townie isn't a claim, it's a side. Try again, Bio.

d3x · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:32 am

What does your PM Rolename say?

Bio Hazard · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:52 am

d3x wrote:Townie isn't a claim, it's a side. Try again, Bio.

To me, Townie = Vanilla Townie

Locke Lamora · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:55 am

Zach, you're up.

Zachrulez · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:57 am

I'm just a vanilla townie

d3x · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:07 am

RedCoyote · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:04 am

Vanilla.

Locke Lamora · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:07 am

Alright, here's why I was so curious:

I'm the Roleblocker. I blocked Hoopla N1, d3x N2 and, surprise surprise, Zach N3. I'm not told whether my block is successful so I can't confirm that it did work last night - what I do believe is that scum are not going to no-kill in a 5 on 1 situation with a tracker alive. I therefore urge you to all join me in a Zach wagon (after d3x's claim, of course).

d3x · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:12 am

Vanilla Townie.

UnVote/Vote:Zach

Col.Cathart · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:20 am

Well, let's test it.

vote: Zachrulez

Locke Lamora · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:23 am

You think we ought to co-ordinate on blocking/tracking just in case Zach's not scum and they really did no-kill last night?

d3x · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:24 am

Sadly, this won't be a complete test. If Zach's claim is true, there's no gaurantee that the RB is what stopped the NK. I agree with LL that I doubt Scum would No Kill in this situation, though. And with no Doc, this is our only reasonable explanation.

Let's win this thing.

d3x · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:28 am

You think we ought to co-ordinate on blocking/tracking just in case Zach's not scum and they really did no-kill last night?

I recommend a track on LL and a block on someone else.

Bio Hazard · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:46 am

^I agree. I also think LL should tell us who he's blocking before today ends.

Locke Lamora · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:50 am

If I tell you who I'm blocking, surely scum will just no-kill to make it look like whoever I'm blocking is scum. That does have the benefit of buying us another mislynch opportunity, I guess. I was more thinking of CC picking someone to track and me blocking one of the remaining two players. My main concern was myself and CC selecting the same target, so I guess him targeting me solves that if you really think I'm lying.

Col.Cathart · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:52 am

I was going to track LL tonight (if the night will happen anyway), so just pick whoever else, and let's see where we can get from here.

Locke Lamora · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:57 am

If we make it to night I'll block BH. You can go ahead and hammer this time, Bio. I'm pretty confident this one will be over.

d3x · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:35 am

Bio Hazard · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:31 am

OK, I hope this ends the game.

Vote: Zach

Zachrulez · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:42 am

Yeah, it does.

Zachrulez · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:42 am

What a monumental disaster from night 2 as well...

d3x · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:52 am

Zach, you were the remaining Scum?