Promised forced content: (here ya go camn)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Crying or Very Sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
Let's see. I have one scum read, and one insane read. Going to go with the scum read for now.
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
I have... I still don't get where your suspicion is from..Jack wrote:Do you really think so? Look over the two posts carefully.jasonT1981 wrote:seems you have just latched onto Yosarian2 post above you were he says he has a bad feeling on me.
What was the point of this post? Did anyone suspect Green Crayons for it, or did you see something to make you think they would? Did his post make him look more town? I don't know what you were going for.Yosarian2 wrote:Green Crayons is still very obv town here.Green Crayons wrote:I find it hard to think that you can come up with a meaningful opinion about someone's vote when you don't have a feeling about the player they're voting for. Of course, you're original assertion (that you "[didn't] like the way Pwnman and jason jumped on the Jack wagon. Pwnman moreso.") is far from meaningful. In fact, it's incredibly vague (which further underscores my posturing suspicion). Why did you not like pwnman's and jason's votes on Jack (now that you're clarifying your suspicion: what made it look unnatural)? Why pwnman's more so than jason's?Dry-fit wrote:I'm not sure what the problem is here. Pwnman's vote didn't look natural or like he was really suspicious of Jack's play. I don't need an opinion of the player being voted to see something fishy about the way a vote is placed.
vote: Bub. I'm happy with this vote after reading the back and forths.
No reasoning? I was quite clear about my suspicious of Bud all day. Granted, Darox explained what I was thinking before I did, and I encouraged him because I liked that he was becoming more active, but that hardly means that I had "no reasoning" for suspecting Bud. I'm pretty stunned Bud flipped town; I thought he was obv scum.pman5595 wrote:Yosarian:light to moderate scum read. Scum suspicions and town suspicions are both not backed up at all, possible buddying, jumps on bud wagon with no reasoning. A few posts about the posing habits of others, possibly trying to look town with little effort.
Um, the point of the post was that green crayons was obv town. Are you disagreeing with me that he looked very pro-town in that post? Or are you one of those people who thinks that no one should ever share their town reads? I don't agree with that philosaphy, personally.Dry-fit wrote:What was the point of this post? Did anyone suspect Green Crayons for it, or did you see something to make you think they would? Did his post make him look more town? I don't know what you were going for.Yosarian2 wrote:Green Crayons is still very obv town here.Green Crayons wrote:I find it hard to think that you can come up with a meaningful opinion about someone's vote when you don't have a feeling about the player they're voting for. Of course, you're original assertion (that you "[didn't] like the way Pwnman and jason jumped on the Jack wagon. Pwnman moreso.") is far from meaningful. In fact, it's incredibly vague (which further underscores my posturing suspicion). Why did you not like pwnman's and jason's votes on Jack (now that you're clarifying your suspicion: what made it look unnatural)? Why pwnman's more so than jason's?Dry-fit wrote:I'm not sure what the problem is here. Pwnman's vote didn't look natural or like he was really suspicious of Jack's play. I don't need an opinion of the player being voted to see something fishy about the way a vote is placed.
vote: Bub. I'm happy with this vote after reading the back and forths.
Finals week, things get short.Dry-fit wrote:After rereading the thread, Camn is still my top suspect. After his initial Jack vote, all of his posts were very short and were just defending himself. No follow-up on his vote, no opinions on anything, no nothing.
vote: Camn.
You're on a need to know basis.jasonT1981 wrote:Right now my suspicion is still on Darklight from Yesterday.. his vote today is just off as well...
though why did you not aswer my question.
Both posts are timestamped 3:05jasonT1981 wrote:you are still also yet to answer what makes you think I am the scum.....I read both those posts you mentioned and not once does it mention me as scum, your suspicion only came after someone else had mentioned me.
really?jasonT1981 wrote:So, why would you not answer again....Darox wrote:Vote: Bub Bidderskins
I'm not answering your question for a very obvious reason.
Given the way the hammer happened I am also suspicious of Darox, Jack.
Darox wrote:The obvious reasons are that my suspects may easily change based on Bub's flip, they couldn't be lynched at that point anyway, and the big one, because I didn't want to influence the night kill.
hahahajasonT1981 wrote:Also, add on how he jumped on the Camn wagon with ease and little explination.
Looking back ,I am confident enough to do this.Darox wrote:
Vote: CamnI think this is a good way to go today.
.
vote Darox
Again, with the need to know basis....Jack wrote:You're on a need to know basis.jasonT1981 wrote:Right now my suspicion is still on Darklight from Yesterday.. his vote today is just off as well...
though why did you not aswer my question.