Mini 944- Town Suav├® - TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANK!!!!! (over)

[Parama]

I almost want to lynch SpyreX because he's in nearly all of my games now.
But he's also very awesome.
And muzzz is scummier.
*sigh* nobody trusts my D1 obvscum read though. I get one every game, and I'm right most of the time.

[muzzz]

@Par: I meant "I didn't bring the fact that Duck used meta up as evidence of Duckscum."

Also, "I get one every game, and I'm right most of the time" is technically a meta argument

---

@DTM: no, I'm making Par's argument for him, not the other way around.

---

I'm going to try something I'll probably regret before we've reached the next page: explain in detail.

Duck and I both brought up a meta argument against a player that was under pressure, and we've both caught flak for it. Now I won't go into the argument of whether or not that's right, but I will point out that it's either a scumtell for both of us, or neither of us. The difference is that I have arguments against Duck that are unrelated to any of that meta.

And that's the problem I have with Par. He keeps ignoring the fact that most of his arguments against me also apply to Duck. Even when confronted with this he simply goes "muzzz is scummier" after pretending to give it some thought.

What I want from Par is simply for him to be consistent. Ideally, that would mean him dropping the "meta is scummy" argument and looking at the rest of the cases. But I've already given up hope that that'll happen, so I'm aiming for the next best thing. Which is showing him I'm right by getting him to help lynch Duck.

---

@Spy: you did realize that your slot is also in that "naughty group", right?

[Nikanor]

Hey you posted the above in response to Duckduck's meta call right?

People go back to page 4: Muzz also posted a meta attack

s that muzzz is voting for duckduck. duckduck is not voting for Kenman. If you read what I wrote, you'll see that I state the main reason for why I'm oting duckduck: he made a crappy attack on someone after unvoting that person.

I see no indication on where you mentioned any intention of Duck's lack of voting, and weak argument. It looks entirely like you pieced together with the arguments from Muzz, Nacho (called out on Duck's lack of voting), Nobody (Prod Duck please!) with a hint of ConfidAnon and CoheedCambria09, and LL, and who ever else I'm missing on the Duck wagons.

Arguments are obvious once everyone else made them Nikanor. IGMEOY

I posted that for Parama. He asked what the case was, so I gave it to him.

dramonic, please post something of use before I am forced to kill you.

[CoheedCambria09]

@everyone - sorry for the low post content, this is my first game back on the site and i have yet to get back into the swing of things.

My suspicion on Duckduck is still present, though I would like to hear from Spyrex more about a)why atleast one of the "not voting" people are scum and B) to see wherre he stands so i can gauge continued "duck" sucmmyness or a turn around

[Nobody Special]

I am also very eager to hear this reasoning as to why there must be a certain amount of scum in the Not Voting category.

Spyre, don't abandon us now!!

[Nikanor]

Spyre, don't abandon

us

your scumbuddies now!!

[Parama]

@Par: I meant "I didn't bring the fact that Duck used meta up as evidence of Duckscum."

Also, "I get one every game, and I'm right most of the time" is technically a meta argument

First point... sure, but you still used a meta argument against him <_<
And apparently, when rereading, I noticed that I had picked up on duck's meta use earlier x_x I somehow forgot about it in the ensuing chaos.
Second point... Touché.

Duck and I both brought up a meta argument against a player that was under pressure, and we've both caught flak for it. Now I won't go into the argument of whether or not that's right, but I will point out that it's either a scumtell for both of us, or neither of us. The difference is that I have arguments against Duck that are unrelated to any of that meta.

Okay, this makes sense.

And that's the problem I have with Par. He keeps ignoring the fact that most of his arguments against me also apply to Duck. Even when confronted with this he simply goes "muzzz is scummier" after pretending to give it some thought.

I'm not calling you out solely for the meta argument - see post 99 for the full reasons I first voted you.
And then in 123 you post a SECOND meta attack on duckduck even after I had already called you out for it. I personally feel my vote is justified. Spyduck is not a terrible wagon but it just so happens I've found an even better one.[/quote]

What I want from Par is simply for him to be consistent. Ideally, that would mean him dropping the "meta is scummy" argument and looking at the rest of the cases. But I've already given up hope that that'll happen, so I'm aiming for the next best thing.

Which is showing him I'm right by getting him to help lynch Duck.

Please point out examples of where I'm being inconsistent or you're just misrepping.
Also, that last sentence is bursting with scummy motives. That's just a silly thing to say as town, and you should realize why.

[SpyreX]

Sorry, long weekend. I'll be back around with more details hopefully tomorrow.

[dramonic]

dramonic, please post something of use before I am forced to kill you.

i didnt read you making similar menace to my predecessor Nik. Do you feel I am a threat?

[Nikanor]

i didnt read you making similar menace to my predecessor Nik. Do you feel I am a threat?

Yes. Lurkers are always a threat to making fully informed decisions as a town.
How about you stop making pot-shots and start posting content?

[Nobody Special]

@Mod (and all): I am going to have very limited net access tomorrow (Sunday), and then absolutely no access until Tuesday evening (Pacific time). My apologies!

[SpyreX]

Actually this game has a decent shot.

Nik's town.
Kenman is... town! Fairly confident too.
NS is an engima and while he wouldn't be a bad lynch due to the gutbelly of very little in his posts he sure doesn't win when compared to

Yep

You guessed it

Vote: Dramonic

Not doing anything? Check.
Putting the snipe

on Nik

for not also calling out McZ for also not doing anything? Check.

Thats a mighty fine pair of checks.

[dramonic]

coming from someone with decent odds of being scum, that doesnt say much SpyreX

[muzzz]

I'm not calling you out solely for the meta argument - see post 99 for the full reasons I first voted you.
And then in 123 you post a SECOND meta attack on duckduck even after I had already called you out for it.

I'm sorry, but I've read 99 half a dozen times and all I get (aside from the meta) is that you didn't understand my reasons for voting. But I've explained those already.

As for 123, that's

not

a meta attack on Duck. Locke was the one who brought up meta to defend Duck. All I did was post the proper context for

Locke's

meta to show that it was rubbish.

Please point out examples of where I'm being inconsistent or you're just misrepping.
Also, that last sentence is bursting with scummy motives. That's just a silly thing to say as town, and you should realize why.

I've already pointed out why you're inconsistent: you're ignoring my arguments against Duck in favor of arguments that apply to both of us. You do so in that very post 99 you mentioned.

And I don't think what I said is silly as town. I'm trying to get my favorite scumbag lynched and prevent you from going after a townie (read: me). Those sound like good things to me. Not so good that they make me obvtown, of course, but definitely not silly either.

---

@Dramonic: actually, it says a lot coming from him. Because he's in the scummiest slot around, yet he just made a very good case for lynching you first.

[Nikanor]

HEY DRAMONIC!
I HOPE YOU LIKE THE TASTE OF MY VOTE!

UNVOTE. VOTE: DRAMONIC!

[dramonic]

@Dramonic: actually, it says a lot coming from him. Because he's in the scummiest slot around, yet he just made a very good case for lynching you first.

You call that a case?
We need to establish a definition somewhere, that's nothing like a case to me.

Also, not sure I understand the second line of the "case". Meaning wise. Explain?

@Nik: Your vote is warm and salty.

[SpyreX]

Dont you ironic quote me guy. I never, nor would I, claim that was a "case".

However, its more than plenty to put the vote here happily.

Line two?

Nik, who is p much town (or super balls of steel scum) is the one you've opted to push against for calling you out on a very clear and solid rationale.

Your reasoning? He didn't also call out who you replaced for for the same activity. Which, realistically, means you see its bad.

[Nikanor]

@Nik: Your vote is warm and salty.

So I've heard. (Also, you're a perverted man.)

(I like it.)

[dramonic]

I've had an evening to that effect.
Also, if you wanna pass as a female you shouldnt jump in innuendos like that.

[SpyreX]

While this dirty segue is tech my REAL WORDS would like you to MAKE TALKING to them happen.

Love,

SpyreX

[Parama]

Not quite understanding the dramonic case at all.
At all.
AT ALL.

[dramonic]

Sorry, didnt see your post.

Dont you ironic quote me guy. I never, nor would I, claim that was a "case".

Didn't say you said it was a case, I said Muzz's perception was weird.

Nik, who is p much town (or super balls of steel scum) is the one you've opted to push against for calling you out on a very clear and solid rationale.

Rationale being that I'm not posting content. In my read I have seen 0 proof that Nik is p much town. However, if you can provide any phrase of mine that is "pushing against" him (You wont find one, but even if you did he's the only one commenting on my fluffiness therefore only one I could theorically push against really) I invite you to point it out.

Your reasoning? He didn't also call out who you replaced for for the same activity. Which, realistically, means you see its bad.

Erm... Do you enjoy putting

stuff

words in my mouth? I asked why he hadn't pushed for my predecessor, while pushing at me. How is the fact it's me make it any different? It IS actually a scummy thing to do, but I didnt make a mountain out of a molehill of it.

Point is, you're trying to make me appear for something (scummy) that I'm not by twisting my words HARD.
You're evil scum SpyreX.

Unvote
Vote: SpyreX

[Kenman]

mod can you replace me, just dont have the time it deserves right now, sorry guys

[Nikanor]

It looks like I'm going to have to explain

yet another

case to Parama.

dramonic is doing nothing. He is actively lurking. He does not do that as town.
Done.

Also, if you wanna pass as a female you shouldnt jump in innuendos like that.

Who said I was trying? >_>

[dramonic]

I'm gonna tone it down on the innuendos now...
@Parama: That's because you read my posts like they're supposed to be read instead of trying to drown someone in a last ditch.