Mini 945: Mafia in Bawlmer - GAME OVER

[Ythan]

I feel you. I've got three history course papers bearing down on me.

[Netopalis]

Well, luckily this year, I only have 3 serious exams. Unfortunately, Constitutional Law covers 197 cases, all of which I'm supposed to know. But, I'll get through it, like I always do...

[Ythan]

Oh hey I'm in a con law class too. But, it's pretty basic.

[Chevre]

Netopalis, you outlined me twice in your brief statements. Can you explain which one, if not a combination of the two, is correct?

[xvart]

I'll be back tonight and post then.

xvart.

[dramonic]

I still maintain that Lock is town.
Cyber too.
Chevre and Apayah potentially not
mild insecurity about Neto.

[StrangerCoug]

Chevre is potentially scum. Look at his response to DC's post. He doesn't mention the rolefishing and throws out a few easily-rebutted statements or statements with only marginal significance as scummy, then follows it up with a vote. I think it looks like he's scum trying to both distance while giving only minimal ammunition to the town.

Chevre...is interesting. I like most of what he has to say, but his D2 refusal to explain his votes is bad form. He's the lightest of my scum reads.

Why is

SHE

in your player analysis twice?

StrangerCoug feels scummy to me. He doesn't seem to post too much content that's not a defense.

You're voting me just for this? It doesn't seem to take my actions today into account. I've posted opinions on Cyberbob, MacavityLock, and xvart. I was quick to drop my Cyberbob case when he explained DiamondCrash as newbscum, and while I can make sense out of MacavityLock and xvart (I even stopped attacking MacavityLock for the Sidekick case), they still seem off to me. This is the first time I'm on defense today.

I do see a long argument with Ophanim in my ISO, but he said he wasn't suspicious of me:

Where have I announced suspicion of Coug? Am I not allowed to have a back-and-forth with someone I don't remotely suspect?

So yeah. Your vote is weak.

[Dizzle]

Did I miss a case against Xvart? I saw him brought up a few times and no case. If someone has something they'd like me to look at in regards to his posts, I'd be more than happy to.

The major thing I have against xvart is the difference between his ISO 10 and 11 posts. In 10, he declares DC failtown but in 11 he says he's ready to hammer DC which he eventually does. Granted, some things occured during 10 and 11 but it felt like scum giving up on his partner to me....and apparently no one else.

Dizzle is a player that I really want to find as scum. For the life of me, though, I don't know why.

Oh great. Maybe I'll sound like a poker player complaining about all his bad beats, but I swear I get pinned with more unsubstantiated gut reads than anyone in the history of mafia

And yeah, not sure what to make of Neto's replication of his Chevre suspicions and I'll also finally weigh in on the ML debate tonight.

[Netopalis]

Accident. I was writing it up, got a phone call, then lost my place. I feel that both are true - I'm having trouble getting a good read on Chevre, but I think that she could very easily be scum.

Stranger - true, you do have some good attacks on MacavityLock and Cyberbob at the start of the day. That was really more of a reaction from day 1. It just look like, to me, your goal is more self-preservation than catching scum. I could be wrong, though.

[Cyberbob]

This inactivity is getting a mite ridiculous. Today's deadline is in four days and over half the players are practically AWOL.

I want everyone who isn't currently voting for someone to rectify this. We need

something

that's going to kickstart discussion.

[dramonic]

aight

Unvote
Vote: Chevre

Did Konowa flake?
He's been gone for a lil while :S

[Cyberbob]

I noticed that as well... I'll send him a PM.

[Ythan]

Konowa does seem to have vanished.

[Chevre]

aight

Unvote
Vote: Chevre

Did Konowa flake?
He's been gone for a lil while :S

I know this was meant to start discussion (as was mine), but is there any other reason behind it?

[Cyberbob]

Alright, so I PMed Konowa around the time of my last post but he hasn't opened it yet... I'll try Amished.

[dramonic]

I find your contribution to be weak (not as much as Apayah, mind you) and well, unlike with Apayah there are more people than myself seemingly willing to vote you.

Which also reminds me I don't wanna make it to 3p.

[Amished]

Ok guys, get cracking! I'm here and will check for activity and get you a vote count. I WILL NOT LET THIS GAME DIE, DAMMIT!

[Amished]

Vote Count 2.3

MacavityLock (4): Cyberbob, Ythan, StrangerCoug, Chevre
xvart (1): Dizzle
dramonic (1): xvart
Chevre (2): MacavityLock, dramonic
StrangerCoug (1): Netopalis

Not Voting (1): Apayah

With 10 players alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Deadline is

April 23rd, 6PM GMT-4

suspended upon finding a replacement.

Prodding: MacavityLock (almost 3 days)
Replacing: Apayah (10 days without posting is too much and is outside the replacement range.

V/LA:

[Ythan]

So dead. If anyone has anything specific they want to delve into before the lynch let's get to it.

[Netopalis]

Wait. Why are we lynching MacavityLock again? Did I miss something?

[Ythan]

Unless anyone wants to look into anything else.

[xvart]

Sorry, forgot to read over this game when I got back.

In fact, now that I think about it, why didn't you ask the same question to Cyberbob and/or Dizzle? Both of them checked in right after me, gave their approval for the lynch, but didn't hammer.

This is a good observation. Cyberbob, why didn't you hammer if you "definitely did not object"? Regarding Dizzle in the same circumstances: I think the waiting for a replacement is a convienent thing to wait for given the circumstances, but I'm willing to believe it at this point (which the same can be said of Macavity).

Unvote
Vote: Cyberbob

xvart.

[Cyberbob]

I'm often not quite sure whether it's the right time to hammer or not. Usually I will wait until everyone else (or most of them at least) has had time to chime in before I do so because in the past I've quite often drawn fire for hammering too early and stifling discussion.

[Cyberbob]

Wait. Why are we lynching MacavityLock again? Did I miss something?

From what I can tell, most of the votes he's picked up have been from people who didn't like the way in which he went after me before about the question I put to Ythan.

[Ythan]

So xvart votes bob in agreement with scummy Lock regarding not hammering a wagon he didn't have a problem with.