Just the vote movement and things I missed during D1..
Read as "Player: Voted for X(Was the nth vote on player at that time),.."
easjo682:
Spyrex(1) -> Josh(1)
Zang:
cruelty(2) -> NoVote -> ooba(2) -> NoVote -> ooba(2) -> Darox(1) -> Josh(7)
Nobody Special:
Darox(1) -> CMAR(2) -> SpyreX (3) -> NoVote -> Josh(5)
cruelty:
SpyreX(2) -> Zang(2) -> ooba(6) -> Josh(4)
TheSkeward:
Zang(1) -> cruelty (2) -> Josh(2)
SpyreX:
cruelty(1) -> ooba(2) -> Josh(3) -> ooba(4) -> Josh(5)
CryMeARiver:
ooba(1) -> Josh(1) -> Yosarian(2) -> Darox(1) -> NS(1)
MagnaofIllusion:
Yosarian(1)-> CMAR(1) -> ooba(4) -> CMAR(2) -> Josh(4) -> Darox (2)
Darox:
NS(1) -> ooba(3) -> SpyreX (1) -> NoVote
Ooba:
SpyreX (1) -> CMAR(3) -> Zang(1) -> NS(3)
Yosarian:
ooba(1) -> CMAR(3) -> NS(2)
Josh:
Darox(1) -> ooba(5) -> SpyreX(2) -> ooba(3) -> SpyreX(2) -> Josh(6)
Post 5:
@Magna
1. Anyone here have any long-standing grudges or odd personal history?
Just curious – what brought about this question?
Post 11:
@TheSkeward
Discuss. Can we break this?
What was this about?
Post 21:
Josh does not random vote. I wonder if anyone noticed that.
Addn: Nobody noticed it or brought any attention to it.
Post 31:
@CMAR
Any reason why you ignored Magna’s initial post – made 4 posts in between and then replied to his questions?
Post 41:
@cruelty
You vote Zang here – no apparent reasoning?? You had already random voted at this stage.
Post 55:
@SpyreX
At this point, there were two votes on CMAR and one on me. Why did you choose to go ahead with my wagon instead of his?
Post 94:
@Cruelty
Why didn’t you vote CMAR here? Subtle pressure without committing to the wagon.
Post 190
Josh wrote:Think, long and hard, about how terrible a player I would have to be if I were scum, was one of three people who asked about a flavorclaim, and then immediately called myself out on it a few posts later. It makes no sense.
Which do you think is more likely: That I'm a townie who misspoke, or that I am literally the worst scum player ever?
I LOL’d at this.
Post 232:
@Cruelty
Goodposting by Magna
I think Magna has a good point against cruelty when he posts this:
Magna wrote:cruelty wrote:At this point I'm happy with my vote on Josh for his contradiction and I'm dubious of Magna's softclaim quote.
If you were really dubious you would have said something back with your first response. Any reason why you waited until after the hue and cry from Sprex, Darox and easjo before expressing it?
Cruelty's response was this:
cruelty wrote:“I did say something, two posts later.”
His original post (i.e the one he is referring to above) was this:
cruelty wrote:“you're reading way too deeply into that.”
I hardly think that your response shows any signs that you thought Magna's VT quote was dubious at that point.
Post 361:
@The Skeward
Why NS? You did say cruelty would be next on your list in your post on Day 1.
Overall:
I think cruelty is a good bet for scum. His votes have been on the whole opportunistic; lot of filler posts and points mentioned above.
Vote: Cruelty
SpyreX wrote:No way in hell he didn't know who the scum were.
Just responding to this since NS also seemed to think this was "obvious". The best interplay for this role would be achieved when Mafia knew Josh but Josh did not know the mafia. Josh would have to try and work out who was scum to protect them - otherwise he'd be protecting town. Mafia would have to try and signal Josh in an overt way so as to not attract attention of town. Tried looking for signals based on this - but couldn't find anything. (Apart from CMAR's "doomed" post but do not think it was a signal)