Perhaps I should preemptively give some reasons for this:bv310 strikes me as a bald-faced liar.
The avatar is my son.danakillsu wrote:EBWOP:Wow, man
Perhaps: Wow, woman? The avatar of a Male is slightly confusing...
1. CC's?bv310 wrote:Sorry I can't post really detailed stuff. On my iPod. Anyway, my role is Luke Skywalker. I am able to sense a player's alliance to the force. I determined wreckstar to be evil. I didn't claim before because I was hoping to get the time to do a proper case. Starting midnight shifts has somewhat limited my mafia time so I decided to just claim now.
Oops, my bad. For the record, I don't find you scummy either. Especially with bv being a (likely) investigative role.danakillsu wrote:LRN2RD!!!!!!! I specifically said in that post that I didn't find you scummy!Second, this doesn't make me scummy. It was a mistake. Mistake doesn't equal scummy, at least not in this case.
Given that bv's claimed target is Wreck, how does bv's role have any bearing on dana's alignment?Slicey wrote:Oops, my bad. For the record, I don't find you scummy either. Especially with bv being a (likely) investigative role.danakillsu wrote:LRN2RD!!!!!!! I specifically said in that post that I didn't find you scummy!Second, this doesn't make me scummy. It was a mistake. Mistake doesn't equal scummy, at least not in this case.
wolframnhart wrote:pre-emptive vote on WreckStar
Yea it wasn't meant to be a true vote, and i probable used the wrong wording anyways.Kdub wrote:wolframnhart wrote:pre-emptive vote on WreckStarNot completely sure about your intention here, so I'm going to take the conservative route and say this vote doesn't count.
Check the last sentence. Saw this as protecting a scummate.danakillsu wrote:I agree with Scott. CMAR, if you're going to claim that much of your role, you should give us the name of your role so that we can confirm whether that fits. Until then, I'm suspicous of you for claiming without any real pressure.vote: CMAR. And bv310 always does this, so no one should be voting for him.
What ooba said. ^^^ Need more clarity on this please. 'Evil' or 'good' is not enough for me to believe you at this point. I'm not sure, but I think you were you trying to breadcrumb your investigational capabilities in post 432, without actually telling us that you had hidden reason to suspect [all of his/her posts in iso]. Am I right?ooba wrote:Your result used the word "evil"? And what does alliance to the force mean? I think "Dark side", "Light side" make more sense as a result .. Need a bit more clarity on this ..bv310 wrote:I am able to sense a player's alliance to the force. I determined wreckstar to be evil.
Uh, wait a second... just read this.Wreck Star wrote:[Starbuck]
Elaboration would be awesome, especially because of what you said earlier today in this post.bv310 wrote:Posting in response to prod. And since you brought it up Farside, the "read" on Wreck is more of the "Guilty investigation" variety. Not sure why I didn't say it before.
So if it was an "investigation", why would you hold back and not push this "information" sooner? Right now, I disbelieve bv because of the conveniency.bv310 wrote:In iso, you read as even scummier than normal. Trust me on this one.
To clarify this before I go, my result on Farside said "You determine her to be good." So...ooba wrote:Your result used the word "evil"? And what does alliance to the force mean? I think "Dark side", "Light side" make more sense as a result .. Need a bit more clarity on this ..bv310 wrote:I am able to sense a player's alliance to the force. I determined wreckstar to be evil.
Thanks Starbuck!Happy ScumDay d3x!
Interesting. There were 4 people on my radar, adn while I fully admit that I was wqrong on the 50% that flipped {and probably Cry as well}, what about Scott are you saying is Town, exactly? I'm obviously not seeing it.I think d3x may need a better radar but somthing of note that so far everyone he had on his radar had some town role.
I'm not going to call this a misrep, but that's definitely not what I was saying. The subtext here is that I don't for a second buy their reasons for having so many Votes here. I couldn't find any satisfactory reasons for their Votes, so I was questioning the Wagon.not a fan of asking why he should join a wagon.
Then what exactly are you trying to suggest? He was flipflopping over the great expanse of 2 posts. He couldn't have investigated in that timeframe. If he was Claiming, than he needed to Claim. If he was Scum faking a result that was unneccessary, then it was the perfect time to catching floundering over it.I don't believe for a second you are that much of a newb to ask these type of questions to CMAR
I probable said this, but I'm not sure where. Point to it plz???Why did you feel that it was thrown together in desperation and didn't make sense?
Bam!!!Hey neighbor I'm from Reseda
If at any time you'd like to decide for yourself {meta}, all of my games are on my wiki.Almaster said he's really good as scum
d3x wrote:Interesting. There were 4 people on my radar, adn while I fully admit that I was wqrong on the 50% that flipped {and probably Cry as well}, what about Scott are you saying is Town, exactly? I'm obviously not seeing it.
I felt he was doing a piss poor job of breadcrumbing to be honest.Then what exactly are you trying to suggest? He was flipflopping over the great expanse of 2 posts. He couldn't have investigated in that timeframe. If he was Claiming, than he needed to Claim. If he was Scum faking a result that was unneccessary, then it was the perfect time to catching floundering over it.
d3x wrote:Sorry, I forgot about Slicey's question. I Voted because the Claim was a load of crap. The Role didn't make any sense and felt thrown together in desperation, imo.
