No, I couldn't have. Answer those questions is a waste of time.CMAR wrote:This is a terribad answer.
Playing with new people comes going through the same routine. You dedicated time to answering the questions badly, you couldn't have taken 10 more minutes to answer them truthfully?
Tell me - do you take the time to fill out 10-minute surveys handed out by people on the sidewalk? I don't.
No I don't. To quote Pierre Trudeau, "Just watch me."CMAR wrote:Yes you do. You can't just accuse random people without any reasoning.
What did the answers and his alignment show you oh king?
And I didn't really get much from it, tbh. It would have been much more useful if ani had fipped scum.
I lied. I said that it wasn't a truth. What're going to do about it, punk?CMAR wrote:That's not what it sounded like. Either you actually thought that or you lied, your choice.
lern2reed, scumbag.CMAR wrote:That's even worse.
You pointed out that Navy was dodging. Then you voted kunkstar with no reasoing, but clear bandwagoning.
Nik's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2210645#2210645]iso4[/url] wrote:Unvote. Vote: kunkstar7.
Active lurking. He has done zero scumhunting in the ~10 posts he's made in this game.
Uhm, when it's changed to aCMAR wrote:What else could over confidence have meant? Still, none of this changes the fact that you were hypocritical.
NO U.CMAR wrote:This makes no sense.
I can has strawman?CMAR wrote:This surprised me. Distancing your buddy? Interesting tactic.
Scum would act hypocritically because they have to lie. Town should not have to lie. Therefore scum has a better chance of being caught in their lie - hypocritical.
Your point? Aren't you supposed to be accusing me of being overconfident?CMAR wrote:This is very interesting. He accuses half the player list of being scum.
Actually, yeah. I agree with Slaxx here. We can lynch Starbuck the "Townie" now.