Mini 948 - Victorian Vampire - Game Over
-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
-
-
TheSkeward Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
-
-
CryMeARiver Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: January 6, 2010
Seriously? Your vote depends on Darox's vote? Why are you voting me when you think he's scummier?TheSkeward wrote:Hey Darox. Could you be persuaded to switch to Nobody Special? I'm more sure he's scum.
Larger FoS on SkewardShowYou can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf
pee on you" - Chesskid
V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th
CMAR-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
-
-
CryMeARiver Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: January 6, 2010
Wasn't meant to impress anyone. It was meant to state who I think was scum and to convince people that I'm not scum and others are. Not to mention your only reasoning behind your vote for me was that I hadn't been posting a lot (which I've posted more than some people still, content wise and post wise).Darox wrote:NOT IMPRESSED.ShowYou can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf
pee on you" - Chesskid
V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th
CMAR-
-
CryMeARiver Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: January 6, 2010
How about the case I just posted?Darox wrote:Got any reasons/post #'s/vague gut feelings to back that up?
I'm kind of neutral to NS right now.ShowYou can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf
pee on you" - Chesskid
V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th
CMAR-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
-
-
CryMeARiver Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: January 6, 2010
Why? And the only thing you had on me was that I wasn't posting, and now I am, so...Darox wrote:Your case is lackluster.
I am not impressed with it. It did not sway my opinions on NS or yourself.ShowYou can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf
pee on you" - Chesskid
V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th
CMAR-
-
TheSkeward Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
Nobody SpecialDarox wrote:Got any reasons/post #'s/vague gut feelings to back that up?
I'm kind of neutral to NS right now.
Doesn't like Darox's nameclaim.
"Very skeptical of Josh". No given reason. At this point Josh is obv the D1 lynch.
Says SpryeX is "less jovial, less outspoken" than usual.
Is way, way too ready to lynch Josh, for "purposely misinterpreting things" - his example is the slippery slope debate. Concludes with "Please, get lynched. Vote: Josh. Still on Page 7. Still reading. Still happy with a Josh lynch."
When SpryeX (not harshly at all, complete with a wink smiley face) responds to his comments, he says "Just observing, sheesh. Don't get your panties in a bunch. Have NONE of you on this whole fucking board EVER heard of '"hyperbole?'"
D2, he votes a lurker. Laughably, he also says "I also have some suspicions about Darox (admitted active lurking, distancing from Josh)"
When Darox pressures CMAR, he says to CMAR, "So, what you'rereallysaying is that your target ceased to be a target, and, for whatever reason, you declined to even look for another target. Gotcha."
In essence: he seems to think everyone is scum. As soon as anyone is under any kind of pressure at all, he jumps onto them as though he's always been there. Furthermore, whenever he perceives any kind of pressure on himself (above, in the response to Darox, and also in the back-and-forths with CMAR), he responds with venomous ad-hom.
I'm definitely happy with a CMAR lynch. I'm fairly sure one is scum, and it's possible both are scum, and I don't see the other contributing positively to the game anyway. But I think NS is more likely to be scum, and CMAR's more likely to be just stupid.-
-
CryMeARiver Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: January 6, 2010
Why am I stupid again? Because I didn't post for a while, I spectated about the setup, and I provided cases on my suspects while defending myself from every argument?TheSkeward wrote:
Nobody SpecialDarox wrote:Got any reasons/post #'s/vague gut feelings to back that up?
I'm kind of neutral to NS right now.
Doesn't like Darox's nameclaim.
"Very skeptical of Josh". No given reason. At this point Josh is obv the D1 lynch.
Says SpryeX is "less jovial, less outspoken" than usual.
Is way, way too ready to lynch Josh, for "purposely misinterpreting things" - his example is the slippery slope debate. Concludes with "Please, get lynched. Vote: Josh. Still on Page 7. Still reading. Still happy with a Josh lynch."
When SpryeX (not harshly at all, complete with a wink smiley face) responds to his comments, he says "Just observing, sheesh. Don't get your panties in a bunch. Have NONE of you on this whole fucking board EVER heard of '"hyperbole?'"
D2, he votes a lurker. Laughably, he also says "I also have some suspicions about Darox (admitted active lurking, distancing from Josh)"
When Darox pressures CMAR, he says to CMAR, "So, what you'rereallysaying is that your target ceased to be a target, and, for whatever reason, you declined to even look for another target. Gotcha."
In essence: he seems to think everyone is scum. As soon as anyone is under any kind of pressure at all, he jumps onto them as though he's always been there. Furthermore, whenever he perceives any kind of pressure on himself (above, in the response to Darox, and also in the back-and-forths with CMAR), he responds with venomous ad-hom.
I'm definitely happy with a CMAR lynch. I'm fairly sure one is scum, and it's possible both are scum, and I don't see the other contributing positively to the game anyway. But I think NS is more likely to be scum, and CMAR's more likely to be just stupid.ShowYou can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf
pee on you" - Chesskid
V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th
CMAR-
-
TheSkeward Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
-
-
CryMeARiver Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: January 6, 2010
TheSkeward wrote:
The grownups are talking right now. Go to your room.Why am I stupid again? Because I didn't post for a while, I spectated about the setup, and I provided cases on my suspects while defending myself from every argument?
Noted that you can't answer the questionSkeward's hypocritical statement wrote:Furthermore, whenever he perceives any kind of pressure on himself (above, in the response to Darox, and also in the back-and-forths with CMAR), he responds with venomous ad-hom.ShowYou can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf
pee on you" - Chesskid
V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th
CMAR-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
-
-
CryMeARiver Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: January 6, 2010
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.
Vote: Nobody Special
*crawls off to his room*ShowYou can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf
pee on you" - Chesskid
V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th
CMAR-
-
TheSkeward
-
-
TheSkeward Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
-
-
CryMeARiver Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: January 6, 2010
Seriously though, you pretty much posted what I did.TheSkeward wrote:CryMeARiver wrote:
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.
Vote: Nobody Special
*crawls off to his room*ShowYou can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf
pee on you" - Chesskid
V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th
CMAR-
-
TheSkeward Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
You just don't have my animal magnetism.CryMeARiver wrote:
Seriously though, you pretty much posted what I did.TheSkeward wrote:CryMeARiver wrote:
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.
Vote: Nobody Special
*crawls off to his room*-
-
CryMeARiver Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: January 6, 2010
That's why animals hate me. OHHHHHH'TheSkeward wrote:
You just don't have my animal magnetism.CryMeARiver wrote:
Seriously though, you pretty much posted what I did.TheSkeward wrote:CryMeARiver wrote:
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.
Vote: Nobody Special
*crawls off to his room*
ShowYou can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf
pee on you" - Chesskid
V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th
CMAR-
-
SpyreX POWERFUL WIZARD
- POWERFUL WIZARD
- POWERFUL WIZARD
- Posts: 18596
- Joined: April 24, 2008
I could go on with the largest ISO ever on how he tunneled Josh all of D1 and me all of D2 and how he has been misrepresenting me and providing cases without validity on me and how he is still obsessed with Josh even on D2, but if you can't already see that and you need an ISO to establish that, you can do it yourself. All of this could easily be misguided townie though, so I'm still not sure on you.
Seems like I've been accused of misreprsenting someone earlier this game.
Funny how that turned out.
I'm not digging / understanding this switch.-
-
TheSkeward
-
-
SpyreX POWERFUL WIZARD
-
-
ElectricBadger Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: June 22, 2009
-
-
cruelty Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 950
- Joined: July 14, 2009
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Because the only reason for vote from the blue like that is reaction fishing. I don’t see any point in responding to what amounts to an RVS style vote. Had he attempted, for example, to put some sort of case with it I would have responded. But he didn’t.ooba wrote:@Magna: When you posted your second last post (before the V\LA notice), you must have been able to see Cruelty's vote. Why didn't you ask him anything about it?
So you placed a vote with no support and aren’t going to bother to respond when questioned why? That’s certainly not pro-town in any way, shape or form. I see you responded much later (444) but the attitude you are expressing still is not pro-town.cruelty wrote: ooba i aint gonna answer that right now.
If this circumstance is indeed the set-up and he was a traitor then logically the Mafia didn’t know his identity. So anyone attacking him (including yourself) should get no ‘town cred’, as it were, regarding lynching Josh.Sprex wrote:While this makes me a little it did give me a missing the trees for the forest moment: Josh was a Doctor.
No way in hell he didn't know who the scum were.
You were proded for not posting. Whether you were bored or not is irrelevant. Not posting and then complaining you were bored is just plain stupid. The game is as active as all the participants make it.cruelty wrote:well i guess that'd depend on the reason for my prod - was i bored with the stagnation, or did my inactivity cause said stagnation?
Given that you were a part of Weeds Mafia also I should think you would know exactly why I posted this. For those interested look up Mini 938 and specifically Ythan and McGriddle. Knowing players have a history (usually involving animosity) is something I want to know when assesseing their interactions with each other.ooba wrote: Just curious – what brought about this question?
Then are you the world’s worst town scumhunter? What possible pro-town purpose does the original post have? Answering the valid point about the post by WIFOMing that ‘no scum would make a post like that’ is even scummier.cruelty wrote:also lol @ bringing up my speedlynch post. world's most brazen scum, right here. gimme a break.
Nobody I'd like to see your response to TheSkeward and Cry's cases on you.
@Zang could you elaborate a bit on your suspicions?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-