Mini 963: Furry Mafia (Game over!)

[StrangerCoug]

VOTE COUNT

Antiximo (1): broomhead
Brandi (1): Zang
DocPotter (1): Antiximo
Espeonage (5): InflatablePie, DocPotter, FakeGod, Fate, Parama
FakeGod (3): Fugitive, NavyCherub, Brandi
Not voting (1): Espeonage

With

12

players alive, it takes

7

players to lynch.

If it's wrong, give us a holler.

[Fugitive]

I don't like anti's vote on Doc. Yes, doc is up there for my scum candidates, but it's a safe-vote that he knows won't affect the game or give away something bad. .

TO say that doc doesn't give information isn't true.

Also, Fugitive, the idea of one vote entirely leading a lynch is exaggerating. While my vote is on Docpotter, while the vote does on a larger extent mean I want him dead, I also want him to talk, and give information to the greatest of his ability (just like I did to fakegod)

Please don't put words in my mouth. I neither said nor implied either of these things.

[FakeGod]

Fugi, you said post 238 was where the buddying starts, but I reread, and......

I put up an argument against Esp, then when he responded, before I could respond, Pie responded, saying basically what I would've said. So, finding this, I agreed with Pie and responded to Esp couple more times before Esp disappeared. That was basically the extent of our interaction, which was attacking Esp for couple posts.

Fugi, is this what you're calling buddying?

[Fugitive]

FG, I call buddying you adding no original thoughts of your own and solely agreeing with Pie. I explained that too.

I'm not calling you attacking Esp buddying, I'm calling you attacking Esp with Pie's reasons buddying.

[InflatablePie]

Fugi, when you put it like that... I can see where you're coming from. You make a very convincing case. I still want Espeon dead (especially after seeing the post that Fate caught that I forgot about), but I think you've convinced me that a FG lynch may not be a bad alternative...

The only other comment I have is that throwing suspicion on people that attack you is a newb tell, IMO. I've seen both newb scum and newb town both do this.

However, the fact that FG isn't offering any real suspicions (that I've seen) and just defends himself with some minor AtE and deflection is starting to piss me off a bit, because he's not helping the town at all by doing this. I'm actually starting to reconsider my stance on FG.

FakeGod, I want your top suspects with reasoning to support your suspicions, ASAP.

[FakeGod]

I can't change your mind Fugi, but here's more responses.

I really hoped that people saw I was just kidding around, especially when I placed that 5th vote on the Random wagon. And yes, you can't read my tone when I type, but you just gave your thoughts on what you felt from my words, and I feel justified in sharing what I thought when I typed.

And you're wrong. I corrected myself before anyone called me on not giving a reason. (only one who posted during the 9 minutes it took me to correct myself was Antiximo, and his posts do nothing of the kind).

I don't know if you're intentionally lying or were just under a wrong assumption, but because you should have went back to check whether someone actually asked me to explain my vote, I believe you were consciously making that decision to lie in order to discredit me in front of other players. Were you maybe counting on me not checking up on my own posts?

[FakeGod]

Terribly sorry for being a response behind.

Fugi, you should read the arguments more carefully, because I, not Pie, was the one who originally accused Esp of being sure about me and Brandi pair. Only thing pie did in that conversation was beating me to a response. I attacked Esp with my own original thinking (you don't have to agree that inconsistency is scum tell, the important thing is, I do, and that's what I attacked Esp with, and Esp was being incredibly inconsistent)

I never attacked Esp with Pie's reasoning. In the pie's post 209 (in comparison, my vote was on post 214) Pie said, "Calling FG/Brandi scum in that manner doesn't sit right with me. " I didn't attack Esp because he brought up FG/Brandi scumteam, I attacked him because he dropped his theory suddenly without any reasons as far as I can tell, even when he stayed and supported that theory

entire

game until his sudden unvote.

Inconsistency

is what I called Esp on, and Pie has nothing to do with it.

[FakeGod]

@Pie: I already said my suspicions, and I haven't changed my mind. I believe Espeonage is mafia due to the reasons I stated before. My other suspects? Sorry, but please give me more time, because I haven't got any right now.

[Parama]

Sorry not much time to say much right now
I like Fugitive's case there's one or two things I disagree with
Espe needs to respond to cases and votes on him
Happy scumday Brandi hope your internet gets fixed soon
I'll gladly be on either the FakeGod or Espe wagon because both are scummy as hell but I'm definitely staying on Espe until he responds

[Fugitive]

I can't change your mind Fugi, but here's more responses.

Yes you can. I like your last two responses actually. That doesn't mean you're not my top lynch candidate, but I'm starting to see other candidates being good lynches too.

I don't like the fact that you can't call out your top 3 suspects though. I find that's only hard for scum to not call up 3 suspects. I could list my top 3 at any time without hesitation.

[FakeGod]

hey, Fugi, were you lying in post 299?

[Fugitive]

Not that I recall, care to elaborate which part? There were 4 points in that post.

[Fugitive]

EBWOP: It seems I have, I apologize. You weren't called out on not giving reasons.

[FakeGod]

......

Did you even read my responses?

[Fugitive]

Yes.

[Fate]

HoS: Antixmo

[FakeGod]

@Fugi: You liked my last two responses, yet you didn't like the fact that I didn't name 3 suspects, which was my last response.

I named you a liar who tried to discredit me in front of other players in post 305, which is a very serious accusation, of which you just ignored in your next post.

I have responded adequately to your case, while you don't even closely read my responses, enough to miss such an important accusation.

Plus, you openly lied, which you admitted to, in order to advance your case on me.

[Fugitive]

Lie: (also called prevarication, falsehood) is a type of deception in the form of an

intentional

untruthful statement.

No, I did not lie.

I read them carefully. I opted out of my original strategy for responding to post 310. Thus, 2 posts.

[Parama]

FG, there's a difference between lying and not reading the thread carefully
Fugi seems to have done the latter.

[Fugitive]

No, I read everything he said, Parama. I told you, I opted out of a strategy.

[FakeGod]

"I opted out of my original strategy for responding to post 310. Thus, 2 posts. "

I don't understand what you just said. Excuse me, but please clarify.

And when you declared in post 299 that I was wrong, you must have went back and checked what I actually said. Therefore, I accuse you of lying

intentionally

, because you were already aware that I, in fact,

did

correct myself in time, and was truthful.

If you are going to tell me that you did not went back and checked to verify my posts before telling me I was wrong, that means you didn't check back or do rereads before you typed up your accusations. Tell me, is this a good way to play this game? Not even bothering to spend couple minutes to check a post before telling people they're wrong?

[Parama]

I don't get it.
I have no clue what Fugi means by a "strategy"
It looks like he admitted to lying and is backtracking upon it even though what he originally said wasn't a lie but more of a "not reading the thread" time thing.
Um wut.

[Fugitive]

@FG - It was part of the strategy. I'll explain when I'm done putting it into place.

@Parama - Yes.

[Parama]

That doesn't help :/
w/e I have no clue what you're doing right now so I'm just going to shut up.

[Fugitive]

EBWOP: I see the confusion. There are 2 strategies/plans of action. One I opted out of and one that I'm currently implementing.