With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
Let me know, if I made any mistakes.
SaintKerrigan (2): Pie_is_good, Cyberbob
not voting (2): Thor665, Socrates
The deadline is:
Countdown
Your objection is noted, but more importantly, I've been wondering lately how the specific combination of Buffalo sauce, chicken, and sandwiches ever came into play. Buffalo sauce is delicious in just about every context imaginable (I had some great Buffalo fries the other week), but chicken sandwiches are typically not that great. Why, then, is the Buffalo Chicken Sandwich unsurpassed by its peers in the sandwich world? The synergy of the ingredients must more than make up for the otherwise subpar nature of a bland chicken sandwich. I find it inspiring, really. The teamwork makes up for any weakness of the individual parts.Cyberbob wrote:So.. you want Charter and then me to be lynched after today but you also want people on the SK wagon? Yeah okay.
Going and checking his posts, I see he doesn't have anything substantial from today which I think is pretty inexcusable. Either get interest in the game or replace out Socrates. I didn't realize his lack of posting was this severe. So yeah, I do want to hear from him and whether he agrees with a Pie lynch or not and who he's most suspicious of and why.Thor665 wrote:@charter - no desire to hear from Socrates first?
ehehehehehehehehehehePie_is_good wrote:Kill Cyberbob and charter.
Well, that's being too specific. I misspoke when I said you specifically were trying to tie yourself to Pie, because your breakdown of the posts earlier was correct. Still, the actual meaning I was going for is that you were both kind of on the same boat together.Thor wrote:I also recall during that answer asking you where you saw my attachment attempts to Pie, which you have not offered thoughts on.
If someone handcuffs themselves to you, you're both still handcuffed together.Pie wrote:Thor wagon sucks.
This seems a little counterintuitive to me, to be honest. Pie's been upfront about his reads. What do you hope to learn? I think you should be more upfront about it.Thor wrote:I feel my standpoint of voting Pie is pretty clear but saw no real need to put a vote on him until after he did his re-read as I feel his attention is already too focused on defense over scumhunting.
I fail to see how the reactions help catch scum as well.MichelSableheart wrote:@Cyberbob: you may find the reactions to such switcheroos amusing, but I fail to see how they help catch scum. I find it extremely difficult to take you seriously.
I disagree about Pie being upfront about his reads (well, let me clarify to, he's been upfront - but he hasn't offered many). At the time I posted that response his 'reads' seemed to consist of townish towards Thor and Michel and suspicious towards SK.Copper wrote:This seems a little counterintuitive to me, to be honest. Pie's been upfront about his reads. What do you hope to learn? I think you should be more upfront about it.Thor wrote:I feel my standpoint of voting Pie is pretty clear but saw no real need to put a vote on him until after he did his re-read as I feel his attention is already too focused on defense over scumhunting.
Thor665 wrote:@Col.CathartCould we please have another prod on Socrates, he hasn't posted since Friday.