fuck... .-.Chronopie wrote:
^@MS: Hunt?
Hunt: Snow_Bunny
This, it avoids trying to break a game.Robocopter87 wrote:Safeclaims are sometimes given to scum so that if they need to claim they have one. It balances out massclaims and stuff sometimes.
IMO this part of your post is WIFOM. I've seen many players (namely, Jack) play suuuuper-obstinate before, while simultaneously being the towniest townie that ever towned.Benmage wrote:Obstinant players are anti-town and more often than not, scum.
Looks like we have a VI here. Which is one of the reasons I wanted a policy lynch. Omfg, if you saw how BlazezRb played in [ongoing game reference redacted], you'd totally know what I was talking about. Seriously. Go look at BlazezRb's past games. W. T. F.BlazezRb wrote:Wow, my shotgun and trying to understand this conversation is giving me a headache.
Is hydrak and Genarichhydra both hydras?
You acted like that long after you were dead tooMidnight's Sorrow wrote:If your talking about Obvscurm. obviously I acted that way so I could get votes so I could use my ability ....
LynchMePls wrote:That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.ReaperCharlie wrote:You say "the town" like you aren't part of us.LynchMePls wrote: This is actually a really great point. This information could be useful to the town, so they should provide it.
igmeoy
ReaperCharlie wrote:hmmmm... i must have forgotten to use [sarcasm] tags...
i guess they didn't make the port over from phpbb2, sry
Ok, so you are ready to drop it then, but when Starbuck comes up and says:LynchMePls wrote:Oh, well, you know sarcasam and the interwebz... they are mortal enemies.
Then all of a sudden you think its oooOOOoooo! suspicious! once again.Starbuck wrote:I didn't get that feeling. This feels to be like you are trying to put suspicion where there really is none.ReaperCharlie wrote:You say "the town" like you aren't part of us.LynchMePls wrote: This is actually a really great point. This information could be useful to the town, so they should provide it.
KageLord wrote:Hunt: ReaperCharliefor having the best avatar in the thread... and for knowing the counterspell for Lumos. Burn the witch!
LOL!molestargazer wrote:Hunt: KageLord
There's insufficient evidence to burn him. Does he weigh the same as a duck?
Because generally even as town he ends up being more of a hindrance to the town than a help, either for some bad reasoning on his part, or by picking the wrong (subjective) person to perform night actions on, and then coming to the wrong (objective) conclusions about what results his night actions yielded, etc. For a shining example, check out Mini 979: Square Enix II: Siege of Obscurum. He came to a terrible conclusion that cleared the godfather for the entire remainder of the game, and the scum coasted on to a perfect victory, riding mostly on Chronopie's mistake in a crucial circumstance.molestargazer wrote:NONE of which affect your randomly assigned role choice in this game. That's saying "don't lynch me because there's more town than there are scum so you're probably going to hit town".Chronopie wrote:- Significantly more often than not, I'm town (like 85:15)
- I'm usually vanilla
- I have a clear history of being mislynch bait.
That said, I'm generally against policy lynches - could someone please explain why a policy lynch on Chronopie would happen?
So yeah... two reasons why he's an awesome lynch.Chronopie wrote:I don't understand why I'd make a good policy lynch.
- Significantly more often than not, I'm town (like 85:15)
- I'm usually vanilla
- I have a clear history of being mislynch bait.
Is there a problem with that post, my god, if you have better reasons to complain in THIS GAME, then give the town proof that has no other game referance.ReaperCharlie wrote:[Looks like we have a VI here. Which is one of the reasons I wanted a policy lynch. Omfg, if you saw how BlazezRb played in [ongoing game reference redacted], you'd totally know what I was talking about. Seriously. Go look at BlazezRb's past games. W. T. F.BlazezRb wrote:Wow, my shotgun and trying to understand this conversation is giving me a headache.
Is hydrak and Genarichhydra both hydras?
Your Appeal to Emotion does not scare me:KageLord wrote:Well, first of all, if I was scum I would be unlikely to risk detection by saying something like that. It's only because I'm town that I thought it would be safe to make a little joke comment (apparently I was wrong). I don't know any scum that would be so bold as to say something like that (granted, I have only played in 3 games).
The argument about our identities is ridiculous/a total waste of time. The Day only lasts 2 weeks (I'm accustomed to 3 week deadlines). I'm slightly dissapointed at Benmage for continuing to pursue the matter; I'd thought that it would end with jmj3000's #144. If youKageLord wrote:Whatever, I suppose I've already messed this game up enough. It looks like the first day might be wasted with my mislynch anyway.
This never got answered... Midnight's Sorrow just went and voted for someone else instead of answering the question.LynchMePls wrote:This is the second time you've voted him, and in another post you specifically call him scum. He only has two posts. Are you still in RVS? If not, what exactly do you find scummy?Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Hunt:KageLord
Yeah, it does seem like a useless argument, but you do bring up a good point. The amount Benmage pushed it began to catch my attention more and more as I read on.KageLord wrote:I personally don't really care if GH says who he/she/they is/are. I'm more interested in how much Benmage is pushing it. He does have a point about obstinate players, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to say that GH is that much of a problem yet. If they are really set on not revealing that information, they must have some reason for it. I'm not sure if there would be more of a scum motive behind it than a town motive. This just seems like useless arguing to me.
I disagree. Entirely.LynchMePls wrote:That's exactly my point, it isn't a misrep at all. Which accounts make up the two heads of the hydra is more important to the game than which characters got which powers. Dismissing that the identities of the two heads could be useful information while saying you are more interested in the fluff seems scummy to me.KageLord wrote:Wow... I thought people had more common sense than this. By "I'm more interested", I meant that I am more interested in that than in finding out who GH is. Thanks for the misrep though.
Agreed.Benmage wrote:It is often the case that scum are given safeclaims. And farside is an experienced girl. Name claiming is a bad idea.
Yes. I agree.jmj3000 wrote:Ok, so my thoughts so far: most of this game has been focused on finding out who the two heads of GH are. Treat the account as what it is named after: a creature with two heads that have separate minds sharing one body. All finding out the heads of the hydra are will accomplish is helping establish two metas that are more than likely being played against. They aren't going to reveal themselves, they have stated their reasons why, let it go. For continuing to ask for their identities, both Benmage and Starbuck have earned my wary eyes on them and their posts.
I wouldn't know, but you sound like you know what you're talking about. I'd sheep ya.jmj3000 wrote:Now, about what KageLord said: why be so interested in the characters put into the game? I can think of at least 10 different characters off the top of my head, but due to events in the show, not a single one of them can be confirmed town or scum just by us knowing their name. Let us find out what characters were included through lynches and deaths, not speculation.
I don't quite agree with you here. Both are indicative of newbie play as well as scum play, and looking at his join date, I don't get the vibe that he's a grizzled veteran of forum mafia. But... indirect semi-defense of KageLord's newbiness aside, yes, these are valid scumtells when applied to more seasoned players. I just think he's too new to understand what he did wrong in suggesting holding off policy lynching. It doesn't exactly say much on the wiki page and there's not really any other way he could have learned about that in the 3 games he said he's played. Like I said earlier, I've still never seen a PL that's gone through.jmj3000 wrote:After looking at you in ISO, I see at least 2 things I really don't like about your posts: 1) the amount of WIFOM in your posts (noticeably the whole first paragraph of post 138) and 2) you saying we should hold off on the policy lynching until later.
There's a lot of long words in that sentence, I'm naught but a humble pirate!jmj3000 wrote:You sound like someone who got affronted when they didn't acquiesce to your request, so rather then try to persuade them, you attack them and try to build a case off of a simple no.
For those who are wondering what he means by this, there was a 2004 Harry Potter game where Harry, Ron, and Hermione were the Mafia. It was pretty epic, I assume. Way before I got here, but I went back and read it because it's a popular example of people doing just that: switching around roles to confuse the f*ck out of people.Chronopie wrote:I'd be inclined to guess that Farside would've either a) provided safe/fakeclaims and/or b) switched around roles (HP mafia anyone?) and/or c) inserted unusual roles to throw us off.
Yeap. This about sums it up. If anyone has anything further to say about this, speak now or forever hold your peace.GenericHydra wrote:The argument about our identities is ridiculous/a total waste of time. The Day only lasts 2 weeks (I'm accustomed to 3 week deadlines). I'm slightly dissapointed at Benmage for continuing to pursue the matter; I'd thought that it would end with jmj3000's #144. If youreallyhave issues with an anonymous hydra, send a PM to the mod.
Why don't you ignore him, and bring something to the table, proving him wrong.BlazezRb wrote:Is there a problem with that post, my god, if you have better reasons to complain in THIS GAME, then give the town proof that has no other game referance.ReaperCharlie wrote:[Looks like we have a VI here. Which is one of the reasons I wanted a policy lynch. Omfg, if you saw how BlazezRb played in [ongoing game reference redacted], you'd totally know what I was talking about. Seriously. Go look at BlazezRb's past games. W. T. F.BlazezRb wrote:Wow, my shotgun and trying to understand this conversation is giving me a headache.
Is hydrak and Genarichhydra both hydras?
1. That post had no referance toBenmage wrote:Why don't you ignore him, and bring something to the table, proving him wrong.BlazezRb wrote:Is there a problem with that post, my god, if you have better reasons to complain in THIS GAME, then give the town proof that has no other game referance.ReaperCharlie wrote:[Looks like we have a VI here. Which is one of the reasons I wanted a policy lynch. Omfg, if you saw how BlazezRb played in [ongoing game reference redacted], you'd totally know what I was talking about. Seriously. Go look at BlazezRb's past games. W. T. F.BlazezRb wrote:Wow, my shotgun and trying to understand this conversation is giving me a headache.
Is hydrak and Genarichhydra both hydras?
We policy'd in mafia 98.ReaperCharlie wrote: Like I said earlier, I've still never seen a PL that's gone through.
Rule #6 of 'Applying Meta for Geeks': When applied to VIs, metagaming is never null, and should not be considered as such.BlazezRb wrote:2. This is based on meta, which isNULL.
Guess all you want, but someone will always prove you wrong. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.BlazezRb wrote:I'm guessing we are out of RVS
1. May I ask you about what you think of Mistu's gameplay then?ReaperCharlie wrote:Rule #6 of 'Applying Meta for Geeks': When applied to VIs, metagaming is never null, and should not be considered as such.BlazezRb wrote:2. This is based on meta, which isNULL.
Guess all you want, but someone will always prove you wrong. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.BlazezRb wrote:I'm guessing we are out of RVS
Yes it did. Kage answered for meReaperCharlie wrote:This never got answered... Midnight's Sorrow just went and voted for someone else instead of answering the question.LynchMePls wrote:This is the second time you've voted him, and in another post you specifically call him scum. He only has two posts. Are you still in RVS? If not, what exactly do you find scummy?Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Hunt:KageLord
I think this is how "I answered" it for MS. Not sure how that answers though since this "scumminess" happened after his vote. It can't really explain why he voted for me before this post. >>KageLord wrote:I personally don't really care if GH says who he/she/they is/are. I'm more interested in how much Benmage is pushing it. He does have a point about obstinate players, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to say that GH is that much of a problem yet. If they are really set on not revealing that information, they must have some reason for it. I'm not sure if there would be more of a scum motive behind it than a town motive. This just seems like useless arguing to me.
You know, I'm more interested to find out which characters are here and what their role powers are. The quotes from the show so far have piqued my interest.