Day 3 Analysis (long overdue)
Sorry about the wall, but it's a catchup.
(+ town, − scum, ± null, ? WTF)
Overall: −All: Sadly, a majority of posts here have been jokes or accusations without reasoning. Entire stings of votes are entirely pointless. Almost the entire game is active lurking, and there really isn't anyone that's pro-town of note.
659: SF: He'll claim his actions today, but doesn't want scum to set up a claim
664: ?But there's no concrete information?
666: −RC: The RVS ended days ago. Literally.
670: And please stop saying you'll reread if it's never going to happen.
672: RC: Please don't answer people's questions for them.
676: ±digi: That is lots of useless WIFOM, and nobody fell for the trap of continuing with it.
678: ±Empking: What's so horrible in his first post? Explain!
682: ±Mafuyu raises a decent point, but why is Mafuyu trying to defend someone else, especially when Mafuyu's play hasn't been great?
688: ±LMP: Why are you trying to give excuses for the play and buddy up to the first person that said you have a semblance of town?
689: −RC: Pot. Kettle. Black.
693: −LMP: Why are you trying to defend against everything, no matter how minor?
696: −Robbnva: Stop backtracking. You have a reason for thinking that LMP is scum, don't change to suit public opinion to try to stay unnoticed.
702: −Robbnva: Still little reasoning. Give explanations for why you're voting or suspicious.
707: −Robbnva: You have had little content yourself that is actually helpful, so just voting someone day 3 because they've "lurked a ton, posted random nonsense" is not a good reason.
719: +SF: Finally gives us information that we can use to analyze and hunt.
731: −Robbnva: "I haven't done anything that scummy, I have basically voted for the people on my scum list"... maybe if you gave actual concrete reasons and kept your opinion for more than one post people would find you less scummy?
732: −SF: "I didn't like his play" is not good reasoning.
734: ±Empking: He already claimed his targets. What else do you want? Stop fishing. Also, if that's a crumb, it's a rather horrendous one.
740: −Robbnva: Stop buddying to LMP. Let them ask questions to people without trying to jump in everytime you see your name.
741: +Robbnva: Actual reasons for a vote. Congratulations. Crap reasoning that seems like you were just clawing for reasons, but still reasoning nonetheless.
745: +CKD: Good defense, though quad posts are a little excessive.
753: −Robbnva: "yes I voted for Lps, but the diffeence is I was not pushing for a bandwagon or asking to start a new one the next day" That's the point of voting. You think they're scum, you want them lynched, you give information, you vote, people discuss. That's mafia. Also, this entire post is pretty much craplogic.
767: −Robbnva: Following again, waiting until someone else votes so you can hide in the crowd
771/774/776/778: −Robbnva: "Also if you really think scum would be this obvious, clearly you are not a very good mafia player" NO. NO NO NO NO NO. NO. That is complete and utter craplogic. WIFOM does not help. At all.
788: RC: See 670. Please stop saying you'll reread if it's never going to happen.
791: −Mafuyu: Wow. Defensive much? Nice OMGUS.
793: −KageLord: With how scummy everyone in this game is acting, a policy lynch is not a good idea. It reads as if you can't be bothered scumhunting so you just lynch the person that's been obvlurking all game.
799: Robbnva: That's because the observation was craplogic. Also, don't start the third person thing.
801: −Mafuyu: WARNING. SCUM. This vote absolutely reeks. This is Mafuyu's second vote the entire game, and just like all of Mafuyu's other posts, there is no reasoning behind it, just bandwagon jumping.
824: Crypto: I think "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." is a more useful Hitchens quote for this game. Welcome.
838: ±RC: Thank you for active lurking. The game's much better because of it. /sarcasm
841: −Mafuyu:
WARNING. SCUM.
This vote absolutely reeks. The second someone tries voting for someone other than you, you jump? You have never had ANY suspicion whatsoever, yet that's enough to L-1.
846: −Mafuyu: And you even admit it.
849: −Mafuyu: So you just keep doing it instead of starting to actually contribute?
850: LMP claims an alignment cop. Up in the air about it. Pretty neutral on LMP overall. Saying you've only found town (and all dead except one) is very safe, since nobody will counterclaim town.
869/870: +CKD: Useful catch on LMP. The calling out a player you knew is town is bad form unless you aren't. Also, don't investigate town unless your sanity is questioned.
872: −SF: Nice complete 180 from 860 with no additional information.
873: −Robbnva: Buddying much? There doesn't have to be a counterclaim for a claim to be fake.
884: −Robbnva: The buddying continues. I point you to 873 to counter "I was the biggest one on his bandwagon".
886: ±Some semblance of an actual case. Yet again, though, Pot. Kettle. Black.
893-896: ?CKD: Odd. I can't really intepret what was going on in your head.
926: Robbnva: Regarding the whole Wilson thing: It's not funny. I'm not sure what you're trying to do with it. PLEASE STOP. NOW.
927: −Robbnva: Back to that same craplogic. "so not helping the town is anti-town"... you mean with so many other people acting so much scummier, you're pretty much throwing down a null vote?
935: How is sanity even coming into question? He investigated people that have DIED and FLIPPED.
937: ±RC: 1 and 2 are correct. 3 and 4 not so much.
948: −Another crap vote from Mafuyu. Surprise.
951: ±LMP: "If you are apathetic you'd be doing us all a huge favor to just replace out. I've tried answering every question everyone has asked and I've been nothing but completely honest and above-board. I honestly don't know what else you want from me." Overly defensive, but could also be annoyed town. Also, why are you even questioning the sanity issue? See 935.
967: +Wow, an actual useful question from RC.
972: −Robbnva: Nice way to give yourself an out when SF eventually flips.
974: −Robbnva: So now you ADMIT that you were bandwagon jumping, but then try to say you've changed?
976: −Robbnva: Complete and utter craplogic. Especially points 2, 5, 8 and 9.
980/981: −Robbnva: Your play hasn't shown you're town. Also, more craplogic. RC isn't helping though, egging him on.
tl;dr:
People that aren't even reading the f'ing game:
Robbnva
Empking
RC (surprise)
Excessive defenses:
Robbnva
LMP
CKD
Mafuyu
Possibly town until proven otherwise:
CKD
Questionable (why are the PRs acting so scummy? They can't ALL be scum):
SF
LMP
Scum until proven otherwise:
Mafuyu
Robbnva
VOTE: Mafuyu
Not really seeing anything on Empking, and Mafuyu is far scummier than LMP.
