See the first portion of my response to you in #225. You know, the one you dismissed as trash? I assessed the hole in my logic. There's actually some content there, but you chose to take my change of opinion on andrew out of it and nothing else. Being highly opinionated is one thing, but strawmanning me is getting a little too ahead of yourself. Besides, buddying up to an accuser is a clear scumtell, which I think is how you view my change of heart on andrew. #1: I took ONE of your stances as my own. Is thatdon_johnson wrote:yeah. so anyway, i think i'm sticking with my kai vote.
^^ please note the hypnotic subconscious suggestiveness here reinforcing the entirely false theory that all three masons would need to counterclaim in order to trap mysterio. this reads to me much like Agar's posts, which if you go back through them, mention multiple scum teams a number of times and also try to cast doubt on the claim through whatever means are available.kaiveran wrote:Whether Mysterio is Town or Scum, it would not be reasonable for scum to counterclaim. In fact, it might not make sense for Mysterio to be scum at all. As pointed out before, if the 3 real masons all counterclaim, that means that we've got Mysterio pinned as scum.
I also don't see
I seriously thought there were more votes on Xite. I explicitly said this. I don't understand how my post haddon_johnson wrote:he ends this post with an FoS on xite. sorry, but why is he focused on the then either/or fallacy of having to choose a side in the day 1 argument. seriously, he brings nothing new to the table, just weighs his options and goes after xite. but wait. he doesn't vote. he uses a lame ass FoS.
this is in contrast to nopoint's simple vote. noppoint, we now know, is town. he shows no fear of the xite bandwagon.
Again, it seems like you're attempting to pin me as the last Mafioso. I want to take issue with you, but I really can't. You have solid reasoning behind most of your claims and don't abuse hindsight, but your arrogance and overconfidence rub me the wrong way and seems to cause you to overlook things. These are more like pet peeves than genuine issues, however, so you look like the ever-so-popular alpha townie. Still, you're antagonizing a townie hardcore and I just wanted this opportunity to set things straight, as people are apt to follow someone like you. I know I haven't been thinking things through. Even if I get lynched, it won't be too much of a setback. Hell, you could even consider it the penalty for my crappy playing.John the Don wrote:in 138 xite points out the fence sitting of kai and votes him. one of the best ways for scum to throw town off their scent is to actually scumhunt. and scum know who the scum are, so they generally can get their votes in the right place.
in 140, Agar seems to take issue with kai. which is odd, because Agar recently stated that Kai's posts were satisfactory. seems like Agar is trying to have it both ways with Kai.