@.@ wrote:Don't you think townies should try to avoid being lynched? Shouldn't they actively try to be pro town? Can you please explain to me the difference between "crying out for townie points" and "playing in a manner that is pro-town."
Furthermore, I had an in depth analysis of your post, and you think I'm scum based off of a knee jerk "oh wow, why did you just do something that stupid" post I made? It's not like I ignored the substance of the game to make that post.
In a large game, is it not normal for me to have a couple targets I think might be scum, and be willing to pressure anyone else if they end up looking scummy?
What is your problem with that stance?
1) You weren't really under suspicion, and you weren't defending yourself, you were just pointing out something that, when you said it, looked pro-town for what seemed like nothing else but to look town.
2) That last part had nothing to do with it. Again, read 1
3) That's not a problem, I do it too. but you said you "weren't liking robbs posts" but then said that you felt you should pressure mystie (two people that are under suspicion right now) No reason, no analysis, just ohai guys, I'm gonna vote now, but make sure that I can change my vote it the other wagon is the one that takes off.
4) read 3
singersigner wrote:Wraith wrote:It was things like this, it was really only scummy because it seems like a cry for town points, but I'm gonna have to ISO you as well... damn, these cases are gonna take forever.
Are you really so stupid that you can't commit to one lynch for the day? Yes, there are more than one scum, but hello, we can't lynch them all at once. Why don't you concentrate on lynching one scum at a time, unless you're only pretending to care about grouping them all together.
All this speculation about scum teams is really making my head hurt. I wish people would stop posting as if everyone's reactions to everyone else is indicative to their alignment with one another. It rarely works that way because it all comes down to WIFOM. "Well if I were scum, why would I react this way to this person, etc."
@Xite...I would really just ask you to come up with a case that we can agree on today, or just stop pretending you can call out all the "scummy" actions of everyone else who even remotely disagrees with you. Also, I no longer think you know what you're doing as much as I did before.
That is all.
(fyi, my boyfriend edited this for me, sorry for drunk posting/reading through posts, I'll be in a much better mood tomorrow, just didn't want to forget how stupid that sounded, even though I'm not as sound of mind, and if he even thinks of counter-arguing my statement using my soundness against me...wudda bitch)
first, I said that, not wraith I think. Give credit where credit is due
I can commit to one lynch for the day, but that doesn't mean I can't put my cases out there. What if I get nk'd and I had a list of who I thought were scum and nailed it but never put it out there? Tunneling is not your friend, so please stop thinking it is.
It's not just people who disagree with me, in fact, the people that disagree with me and have a REASON for it actually look more townie to me. I'm looking at posts and reactions, that is all.
Also, no, I'm not going to attack your posts because you're not of sound mind, but I am going to advise you to not even read mafia when you're drunk, trust me, it does not turn out well (you forget all your perfect cases on people and the connections you made to them till the game is over
)
flinter wrote:@Xite. Your idea about the Dana-scum theory is nice. He would expect david to investigate him, etc. He would know he himself was fake, and that's why scum wouldn't target dana. Good one
About Xite. You just became more protown (although the role is possible as scum. However, in a game where only the kill on DP remotely makes sense as vig, I doubt it). Scum would never fake this.
Not sure if this is sarcasm or not, but you really ought to work on thinking things out before you post, go ahead and read my posts again and maybe you'll understand better.
hey, you just became scummier. Townies read massposts almost every time, no matter how long they are.
Wickedestjr wrote:Xite wrote:First, I'm going to take a look at wicked when you (Wraith) flip scum.
Xite wrote:If Wraith flips scum, wicked is probtown. This is too obvious buddying for them to be scum partners.
??? Explain this contradiction.
How far between were they? Did wraith post before that? Did you?
Probably what happened was that I saw the buddying wraith was doing and how you were defending and I thought you were a scumteam, but then I saw how much he was pushing his buddying with you, and I decided that he was just trying to get a mislynch for tomorrow.
Wickedestjr wrote:Benmage, Mysterio, and hiphop were the only three players that were on all three bandwagons and none of them were the early votes on the bandwagons so they all look opportunistic. Gorrad, Robbnva, and singersigner also look a bit bad. Xite, danakillsu, and Porochaz look a bit better, and ConfidAnon looks much better: He was the second on the Wraith bandwagon and also had the guts to put danakillsu at L-2. I'm going to read Benmage, hiphop, Mysterio, Gorrad, singersigner, and Robbnva in isolation.
Hey singer, gonna attack wicked too?
I mean, he's making way more than one case.
Robbnva wrote:Gorrad wrote: Robbn is a poor player regardless of alignment, and that pings scumdars.
As much as I hate that you said this, sadly this is true about me
and @xite, you were right my post really wasn't about defending myself per-se cause you haven't provided anything of value against me.
I think it is funny that I use my own experiences in games and turn them into reasons why I think that person is scummy, yet that looks scummy. That doesn't make sense.
my reason for voting mysterio is a valid one. when mafia is pretending to be town, IN MY EXPERIENCES, they have used words like "seems" or "hope" and things like that. Never posting any actualy reasons as to why somebody is scummy, but my votes I post reasons why I think they are scummy and that is scummy?
You're right, I'm working on it, but I'm also working on moving, working, and doing other things IRL. I set aside tonight for just mafia, so I will have a case for you then.
danakillsu wrote:So, uh, fill me in, because I can't find this anywhere. Why is Wraith not being daykilled instead of lynched? I thought we agreed we had to lynch someone else because of the daykill.
So uh, dana. Read massposts. They're worth it.
Robbnva wrote:danakillsu wrote:So, uh, fill me in, because I can't find this anywhere. Why is Wraith not being daykilled instead of lynched? I thought we agreed we had to lynch someone else because of the daykill.
he claims it happens towards the end of the lynch, which makes no sense cause he has now started voting for wraith again, why lynch him if he is going to die anyway.
Robbie, I know this isn't the first time I directed you to read that post, because you keep insisting how true my dk was. You're selectively reading, which makes me believe that you're scum even more
Robbnva wrote:Wickedestjr wrote:
Post 58: Robbnva decides Xite is no longer a good scumhunter because Xite suspects Robbnva. Not liking that response at all.
you misunderstand, not cause he suspects me but because he is so sure on his reads without anything to validate them. Accusing me without any reason and daykilling wraith(although now it looks fake) wraith with again no intel if he really is scum or not.
A smart player would not be so reckless.
And what would validate them other than a flip? Are you saying we should just nokill every day and watch the nk's every night? Cuz that would be real effective for catching scum
Wraith wrote:Was the daykill fake? I'm confused.
Wow wraith, you too?
Shanba wrote:Let's get this sorted.
Xite, were you lying about the daykill? If not, why are you still trying to lynch Wraith? If you are, why did you lie?
Read. The. Goddamn. Thread. I gave reasons for everything I explained everything and I won't again.
UltimaAvalon wrote:
Xite wrote:I'm done with the charade, it was actually faked.
It was a simple gambit, in order to get a few things running.
Reading Comprehension is an amazing skill
I lol'd but you left out the reasoning
@Wicked about hiphop - Also, he never went anywhere with the wagons, so what info do we have from them?
Also him not stating WHO his case would be on added an awesome amount of ambiguity to his case.
Robbnva wrote:Xite91 wrote:
I waited until after the VC because that was when I remembered that I hadn't switched my vote? But I'm done with the charade,
if was actually faked.
For the record, though, other than me having a DK I didn't lie about anything I said about DK's (I have seen things like that
)
is this a typo? I am taking from the context that I guess
if
should be an
it
and pretty lame to fake a daykill
Yes, it was it, sorry?
also, did you read the reasoning? And did it get a lot of discussion and much better scumhunting?