Mini 1061: Mafia in Someplace - Game Over!


User avatar
el simo
el simo
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
el simo
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1805
Joined: September 20, 2009

Post Post #100 (ISO) » Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:12 pm

Post by el simo »

Third Vote Count of Day 1:

[0] Benmage - [
diddin
]
[1] Slaxx - [TheLonging]
[1] Elleran - [Sweep]
[1] ICEninja - [Benmage
, el simo
]
[2] Sweep - [Elleran,
ICEninja,
Slaxx]
[2] Retrospective - [ICEninja, el simo]
[1] TheLonging - [Jase]

Names in
strikethrough text
indicate unvotes.

With 12 alive, it takes 7 votes to achieve a lynch and to end Day 1. Deadline for this day can be found here.


Because you went on a tangent about scum buddies and other nonsense that I wasn't accusing you of. I was attacking your logic, not your actions. You realize this, right?
"How very Rambo-esque of you." - Bazz
"If el simo + Internet Stranger end up being scum in this game, I'm going to openly weep when we lose." chkflip
User avatar
Retrospective
Retrospective
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Retrospective
Goon
Goon
Posts: 476
Joined: September 3, 2010

Post Post #101 (ISO) » Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:37 pm

Post by Retrospective »

Well, maybe I'm confused but, the 'tangent' I went on was directly refuting your case. You mentioned how my actions were inductive of scum buddying with a scumbuddy. You used slaxx and I as your example. I then explained how Slaxx and I couldn't be scumbuddies. I'm sorry if I didn't word it how you'd like. However, you are misleading the situation
again.
I haven't ignored any of your points, and if I have then it shouldn't be too difficult for you to specify what they are. Stop speaking in generalities, you're trying to make me sound scummy without providing any actual context.

It's 4:30 AM here, I'm going to bed. Will reply more tomorrow.
User avatar
el simo
el simo
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
el simo
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1805
Joined: September 20, 2009

Post Post #102 (ISO) » Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:53 pm

Post by el simo »

The only reason I responded to your explanation was to show you how it was wrong. I don't care who your buddy is, that's not why I'm voting you. Here, I'll quote myself again.
el simo wrote:I am voting you for based on my experience with scum and this argument. The rest of you what rambled on about has nothing to do with me and is just more WIFOM.
I should note that 'that' argument includes WIFOM arguments.
"How very Rambo-esque of you." - Bazz
"If el simo + Internet Stranger end up being scum in this game, I'm going to openly weep when we lose." chkflip
User avatar
Sweep
Sweep
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sweep
Goon
Goon
Posts: 131
Joined: September 12, 2009

Post Post #103 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:23 am

Post by Sweep »

Hmm, I am now awake and there are 50 more posts, this could take a while..

Retro:
Retro wrote:I made the assumption that there would be three. Our last game, ICE, there were two mafia with nine players so I assumed the extra three players their would be another mafia. Am I wrong? I feel like the game would be a bit unbalanced given the fact that no one knows each other's roles with four mafia.
For such a absolute statement about the number of mafia, this is a less than absolute back peddle. As Ice points out
ICE wrote:Had you said something to the effect of there always being 3 scum in a 12 player game at EM, I definitely would have bought that. However, your earlier statement just seemed too absolute, as I pointed out in your wording, to be written off as a guess.
.
Retro also tries to justify his behaviour is one of the most unconvincing ways possible, saying that he is not scum.
Retro wrote:You're wrong on it being a scumslip because I'm not scum.
and then, an equally unconvincing anecdote about there being scum everywhere to try to defend himself. The logic "I am not scum because of one action" does not make sense.
Retro wrote:You guys need to look at the big picture not every minute detail. I learned this the hard way because I tore someone's ISO apart looking for a way to convince town to vote him, and I had a very persuasive case even though he was town. >.>
I agree with the analysis that El Simo made about your post but I think the analysis is not about the correct point. El Simo, you seem to be confused with the nature of the argument I was making against Slaxx. I tried to make the point that he was buddying up to Retro and that this meant that either Slaxx was scum trying to gain a town allie or a null tell. I did not suggest that they were both scum. Here we are left with two very contradictory positions, Retro is looking very scummy with his defence but then from the original set, Retro should be town and Slaxx scum.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Benmage, for a very experienced player is playing a very dumb game, making only two posts both with bizarre statements or questions. The first
Benmage wrote:el simo who is your alt..or main?
Someone with as much experience does not need to ask this question to know the point of alt accounts.
Benmage wrote:and looking at this playerbase I am without a doubt the best present player.
and again, he is taking us for fools, stating he is the best player here to draw out reactions and question his ability when he has made over 4k posts. Benmage is not all he seems..

More activity from: Rewq, Jase, Iamnobody
User avatar
rewq455
rewq455
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
rewq455
Goon
Goon
Posts: 739
Joined: November 9, 2009
Location: Jus chillin how bowt you

Post Post #104 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:42 am

Post by rewq455 »

Im really sorry. I tend to post a good deal more than I am now, but I have some RL issues that should be resolved in the next few days, a week @ max.
The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on.
Scum who smiles when scum is lynched just led the wagon.

My stats and game links are in my wiki.
User avatar
TheLonging
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2587
Joined: December 10, 2009
Location: Coffeeland

Post Post #105 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:11 am

Post by TheLonging »

diddin wrote:
el simo wrote:
TheLonging wrote:because scum aren't that stupid.
Don't ever do this.
Oh my god this so much. Scum can and will do whatever the fuck they want.
Yes they can, but really, do you expect scum to lead a BW on their own scum? I mean, from the VERY first vote on them? And that picked up FAST. 3 or 4 votes sure, but do you realize what the people voting for Sweep were doing? They just voted and latched on to Ice.
Retrospective wrote:@TheLonging; RVS's are generally meaningless. Mafia will gladly vote their partner because their partner is in no real danger. Clearing someone because they were bandwagoned first is terrible. Same can be said for who followed first.
But Ice voted for Sweep OUT of RVS. He used a case on Sweep based on RVS votes really. That's kind of, you know, STUPID at best.

el simo: You're arguing that all or most scum would stay low, be stupid, and lurk/not do anything useful while the rest of town argues with each other.

stop that
Last edited by RichardGHP on Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Show
Town:
0-1 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Scum:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
3rd Party:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Overall: 0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)

Thestatusquo - and that, ladies and gentlemen, was trolling.
cyberbob - it doesn't count if you're insecure enough about it to have to openly pat yourself on the back
User avatar
TheLonging
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2587
Joined: December 10, 2009
Location: Coffeeland

Post Post #106 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:25 am

Post by TheLonging »

Mod: fix the bold tags?


Mod ~ Done.
Last edited by RichardGHP on Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Show
Town:
0-1 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Scum:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
3rd Party:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Overall: 0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)

Thestatusquo - and that, ladies and gentlemen, was trolling.
cyberbob - it doesn't count if you're insecure enough about it to have to openly pat yourself on the back
User avatar
Slaxx
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7382
Joined: January 1, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana

Post Post #107 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:53 am

Post by Slaxx »

TheLonging, you're wayyyy too black and white about this. As I previously stated, the first RVS bandwagon hardly ever goes to completion so what do scum have to fear by hopping on a scumbuddies bandwagon if they are pretty sure it won't go to completion? And for that matter why should a townie care if he/she is confident the wagon will not go to completion? It is afterall the first bandwagon of the game.
User avatar
Slaxx
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7382
Joined: January 1, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana

Post Post #108 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:54 am

Post by Slaxx »

Also
unvote
.
User avatar
Retrospective
Retrospective
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Retrospective
Goon
Goon
Posts: 476
Joined: September 3, 2010

Post Post #109 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:59 am

Post by Retrospective »

TheLonging wrote:Yes they can, but really, do you expect scum to lead a BW on their own scum? I mean, from the VERY first vote on them? And that picked up FAST. 3 or 4 votes sure, but do you realize what the people voting for Sweep were doing? They just voted and latched on to Ice.
Honestly? Yes. There's no negative repercussions of voting your partner in a RVS. RVS is just that, random. Players do whatever they want because it doesn't generally matter and almost all of it is dismissed because it's sole useless. (This would be the reason I don't participate) Sure, once in a great while someting from an RVS can be useful but should never be the only reason why you're clear or suspect someone.
TheLonging wrote:But Ice voted for Sweep OUT of RVS. He used a case on Sweep based on RVS votes really. That's kind of, you know, STUPID at best.
You know he's changed his vote since then, right?
User avatar
TheLonging
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2587
Joined: December 10, 2009
Location: Coffeeland

Post Post #110 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:03 am

Post by TheLonging »

OK retro and people you don't understand me.

When I saw scum lead a BW on their own scum, I was referring to Ice/Sweep, OUT OF RVS.

And I do realize, because he realized how crap his case was.
Show
Town:
0-1 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Scum:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
3rd Party:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Overall: 0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)

Thestatusquo - and that, ladies and gentlemen, was trolling.
cyberbob - it doesn't count if you're insecure enough about it to have to openly pat yourself on the back
User avatar
TheLonging
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2587
Joined: December 10, 2009
Location: Coffeeland

Post Post #111 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:05 am

Post by TheLonging »

Slaxx wrote:TheLonging, you're wayyyy too black and white about this. As I previously stated, the first RVS bandwagon hardly ever goes to completion so what do scum have to fear by hopping on a scumbuddies bandwagon if they are pretty sure it won't go to completion? And for that matter why should a townie care if he/she is confident the wagon will not go to completion? It is afterall the first bandwagon of the game.
Again, I meant ICE making a case on Sweep. Do you call that a RVS BW? Hell no. He made a case on Sweep based on HIS RVS votes.
Show
Town:
0-1 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Scum:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
3rd Party:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Overall: 0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)

Thestatusquo - and that, ladies and gentlemen, was trolling.
cyberbob - it doesn't count if you're insecure enough about it to have to openly pat yourself on the back
User avatar
Slaxx
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7382
Joined: January 1, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana

Post Post #112 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:06 am

Post by Slaxx »

I really don't think that's something you can discern from this situation thus far.

Ugh. Alright, ICE, link me to a game where you were town. Any one.
User avatar
TheLonging
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2587
Joined: December 10, 2009
Location: Coffeeland

Post Post #113 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:20 am

Post by TheLonging »

Slaxx: This is from my prior experience playing on here and on several off-site games. I'm pretty sure in this. So the only way I could possibly think Sweep is scum barring any investigative reports is if ICE somehow got EXTREMELY lucky catching scum based on their RVS votes. And if you're going to defend Ice based on his meta, don't.
Show
Town:
0-1 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Scum:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
3rd Party:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Overall: 0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)

Thestatusquo - and that, ladies and gentlemen, was trolling.
cyberbob - it doesn't count if you're insecure enough about it to have to openly pat yourself on the back
User avatar
Elleran
Elleran
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Elleran
Goon
Goon
Posts: 716
Joined: May 9, 2010

Post Post #114 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:42 am

Post by Elleran »

Wow, I was gone for a day and 2 more pages appeared.

The critiques against TheLonging seem to have originated from some opinions TL said about scums. Unless I'm missing something, I don't think this is a case worth arguing for pages and pages for. An opinion is an opinion. You can't honestly expect to try to argue your way into changing another player's mentality.

Also
Unvote
.

RVS is coming to more-or-less an end.
Helloran Elleran
User avatar
Sweep
Sweep
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sweep
Goon
Goon
Posts: 131
Joined: September 12, 2009

Post Post #115 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:56 am

Post by Sweep »

RVS is over.
User avatar
TheLonging
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2587
Joined: December 10, 2009
Location: Coffeeland

Post Post #116 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:58 am

Post by TheLonging »

Excellent, now what do you think about everything else?
Show
Town:
0-1 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Scum:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
3rd Party:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Overall: 0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)

Thestatusquo - and that, ladies and gentlemen, was trolling.
cyberbob - it doesn't count if you're insecure enough about it to have to openly pat yourself on the back
User avatar
Sweep
Sweep
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sweep
Goon
Goon
Posts: 131
Joined: September 12, 2009

Post Post #117 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:09 am

Post by Sweep »

Read my above post (#103), which everyone has seemed to ignore so far.
User avatar
rewq455
rewq455
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
rewq455
Goon
Goon
Posts: 739
Joined: November 9, 2009
Location: Jus chillin how bowt you

Post Post #118 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:10 am

Post by rewq455 »

Slaxx wrote:TheLonging, you're wayyyy too black and white about this. As I previously stated, the first RVS bandwagon hardly ever goes to completion so what do scum have to fear by hopping on a scumbuddies bandwagon if they are pretty sure it won't go to completion? And for that matter why should a townie care if he/she is confident the wagon will not go to completion? It is afterall the first bandwagon of the game.
I agree. Bandwagoning in RVS does not give any tells, unless some members are eager to lynch someone for no reason.
The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on.
Scum who smiles when scum is lynched just led the wagon.

My stats and game links are in my wiki.
User avatar
rewq455
rewq455
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
rewq455
Goon
Goon
Posts: 739
Joined: November 9, 2009
Location: Jus chillin how bowt you

Post Post #119 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:11 am

Post by rewq455 »

oh yeah since RVS is over,

Unvote
The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on.
Scum who smiles when scum is lynched just led the wagon.

My stats and game links are in my wiki.
User avatar
diddin
diddin
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
diddin
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1922
Joined: December 23, 2009
Location: Belvidere, IL

Post Post #120 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:14 am

Post by diddin »

All these unvotes without revotes just because RVS is apparently over make me cry.

Just woke up, more later.
Show
Town 8/4
Mafia 2/3
3rd Party 0/0

Everyone loves Diddin-Slaxx
User avatar
TheLonging
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2587
Joined: December 10, 2009
Location: Coffeeland

Post Post #121 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:30 am

Post by TheLonging »

rweq is bad at reading

Sweep: I know, that's why I said EVERYTHING ELSE
Show
Town:
0-1 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Scum:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
3rd Party:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Overall: 0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)

Thestatusquo - and that, ladies and gentlemen, was trolling.
cyberbob - it doesn't count if you're insecure enough about it to have to openly pat yourself on the back
User avatar
TheLonging
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2587
Joined: December 10, 2009
Location: Coffeeland

Post Post #122 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:32 am

Post by TheLonging »

*rewq
Show
Town:
0-1 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Scum:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
3rd Party:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Overall: 0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)

Thestatusquo - and that, ladies and gentlemen, was trolling.
cyberbob - it doesn't count if you're insecure enough about it to have to openly pat yourself on the back
User avatar
Sweep
Sweep
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sweep
Goon
Goon
Posts: 131
Joined: September 12, 2009

Post Post #123 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:45 am

Post by Sweep »

Politics, the economy? What more do you want me to say?

Bandwagons in RVS are not tells.
I think Retro is suspicious not because necessarily because of his absolute -> fuzzy (Although it is part of it) but also because of his explanation and defence being so weak.
Benmage is trying to play us.
The case against me was utter crap by ICE and must have been a gambit to draw out some scum looking for a bandwagon.

I have thought more than most players in this game already.
User avatar
TheLonging
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheLonging
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2587
Joined: December 10, 2009
Location: Coffeeland

Post Post #124 (ISO) » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:46 am

Post by TheLonging »

you have talked about retro, ice, and benmage. And the rest of us?
Show
Town:
0-1 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Scum:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
3rd Party:
0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)
Overall: 0-0 at MS.net (0-0 offsite)

Thestatusquo - and that, ladies and gentlemen, was trolling.
cyberbob - it doesn't count if you're insecure enough about it to have to openly pat yourself on the back

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”