Palmer
: The only person's alignment I know for certain is my own. As far as what I think about you...I think you are scum. You've done little to no scumhunting, instead choosing to spend 90% of your time in this game talking about metas and people's locations and your own role and some nebulous plan to triumph over scum and save the day--I mean, yourself. When you
have
voted, or voiced suspicions, your arguments have been very weak. Right now you are saying that you think any other wagon besides yours would be more likely to hit scum, and you say whose wagon you wouldn't be willing to hop on, but you have never done any scumhunting, and you pretty much only vote based on who you think would make a good wagon (or so you've implied when voting, as you've actually said the word "wagon"
every single time
you have voted outside of RVS.).
Palmertrou ISO 26 wrote:I don't want to vote for Skyquiem just because it's the
counterwagon
. Unless people think a
wagon
on Furcolow would be better I'm going to go ahead and...Vote: Jenniwren
Palmertrou ISO 37 wrote:What I'm going to do is vote Furcolow right now in hope that people will see that it's a better
wagon
than Sky's.
Palmertrou ISO 40 wrote:I don't see a
wagon
on Furcolow gaining much traction but he seems to be the most suspicious to me today. Unvote: Vote Skyqiuem
Palmertrou ISO 41 wrote:switching to the biggest
counterwagon
. Vote Furcolow
(By the way, I LOVE the dramatic pause when you vote for me...
)
My thoughts on your claim:
The way you've approached this game, if you are a roleblocker, and you want people's locations, then I can only think you would be a scum or third-party roleblocker.
Some of your quotes that are still making me scratch my head:
Palmertrou ISO 19 wrote:Anyway, scum know that I'm a PR, the PR's know I'm a PR but can't defend me without outing themselves in the process. I really don't want that either.
How do scum AND town PRs know who you are? I've not played mafia as long as some of you, but I've never been in a game where the scum and the town PRs know a PR before a claim or flip. This comment therefore does. not. compute.
Palmertrou ISO 22 wrote:Jeez guys... if you look for holes hard enough you will find them. Your only looking for holes because you like to make people feel insignificant to your superior intellect. I will not reply to you. If you want me to reply to you, you don't talk to me like an infant. I'm kinda okay with you believing the opposite because I like to see guys like you get egg on your face.
AtE much? And your claim IS full of weirdness. You aren't addressing their concerns here; all you are doing is complaining that they are questioning your claim. I've seen people treat others like they are stupid in mafia games, and they weren't doing that
at all
.
Palmertrou ISO 30 wrote:I suppose the best answer I can give is that if I was lying about my alingment why would I tell the truth about my role. I can't really think of a reason. I'm sure someone could probably concoct a far fetched reason why.
Because scum have roleblockers too? Is that reeeeally SO far-fetched?
Palmertrou ISO 40 wrote:I'm trying to figure out the likelyhood of if he is in the game. If it's near enough 100% then I could do something to save myself getting lynched but it doesn't sound like it is certain enough (see coach travis' post)
Palmertrou ISO 40 wrote:I wanted to clear myself by claiming a role that was approximatley 100% likely to be in the game in everyone elses opinion. Of corse I'm not disputing that he's less than 100% likely to be in the game. This was so that if it was found out that nobody else was the thiefmaker then I am telling the truth about my claim. See?
So you want everyone else to claim, or to say they aren't the Thiefmaker, and that will validate your claim? You do know that if it's your fakeclaim, no one else will be the Thiefmaker, either. I see that you're saying that to try to prove your claim is legitimate, but you are using a very convoluted explanation to do so, and those lengths only make me think you are flailing.
Palmertrou 46 wrote:A no lynch is better than lynching town = fact
Maybe later on in the game...but on D1, it's better to lynch than to not lynch. I'd prefer lynching scum, and I think you are scum, so I'm happy to vote you.
Palmertrou ISO 32 wrote:2)Why is my
claim awful?
Not saying it's a slip, since you did write the word "scum" in the sentence preceding this one...but it does rather look a bit like one.
Vote: Palmertrou
You can't blame anyone but yourself for your lynch, as again, you've spent your time in this game doing everything but scumhunting, including the thing about your meta, the inquest into locations, and lots of defense and QQ about your claim...including not one but TWO complaints that people were trying to hard too find holes in your claim (ISOs 22 and 42). (Finding holes is sort of the point of mafia, is it not?)
