VP Baltar 1 - Sottyrulez
nopoint 1 - CKD
curiouskarmadog 1 - Vi
Still waiting on these from last game question dodger!VP Baltar wrote:@Equinox - how would you self describe your playstyle? If you could daykill anyone from the start of this game with no repercussions, who would it be? Do you prefer chocolate or vanilla ice cream?
1. Questions, analysis, and votes. I've been known to use colored text and be kind of whimsical. >_>VP Baltar wrote:@Equinox - how would you self describe your playstyle? If you could daykill anyone from the start of this game with no repercussions, who would it be? Do you prefer chocolate or vanilla ice cream?
Why did you feel the need to include the second line? It's not like we haven't seen that particular vote before.
"...you're like a trained ape"? /shotcuriouskarmadog wrote:my god...
VP Baltar is correct in this regard; you pegged Vi as town on practically nothing. I call buddying.curiouskarmadog wrote:vi is quite obviously town this game...I got your meta bud
How to kick off Day 1:curiouskarmadog wrote:just getting the game started,
I don't know that Vi is town. I just know that your behavior towards Vi was suspect. As for your second question, the wording is interesting, but I'll run with it. Nothing pro-town about what I did; it's a totally null action. I just have no qualms about putting people at L-1 when I feel it's appropriate.curiouskarmadog wrote:Equinox, quick question buddying (how do you know that vi is actually town?), what is protown about asking for St. K and no point to post (null reads) but still putting me at -1?....unless you just want my claim.
Oh.curiouskarmadog wrote:I am vanilla.
That is the problem with my read of you. The actions I outlined aren't pro-town, but your Scummy there says you can't be this obvious as scum. WRT to the bolded portion, it's interesting that you took this view on things. What about any of us led you to think that we don't like metagaming?curiouskarmadog wrote:lol, you guys must think I really blow at being scum? as anyone actually bothered to read a scum game I have been in?....but that is blah meta suck blah.
scum hunting bud...i give him a "town" cred, to see what he does with it....and wondered why he didnt comment on my change in style...if i felt he was completely town, do you really think I would follow up with this?....but I guess that didnt really fit into your "he is scum buddying" theory..so you left it out when pushing the thoery?curiouskarmadog wrote:hmmm.....but no comment on my different play style?
I dont recall being so jokey last time around.
Are you suggesting that I'm simply pushing a case and not trying to discern alignment? Don't pull the VP Baltar move again; one headache's enough.curiouskarmadog wrote:....but I guess that didnt really fit into your "he is scum buddying" theory..so you left it out when pushing the thoery?
You're missing the point. I won't argue that "voting someone who hasn't posted in-game" by itself is not scummy, but doing it while ignoring a major part of the game is odd.curiouskarmadog wrote:spreading my vote around = scummy? voting someone who hasnt posted in game in the first 3 pages of a new game = scummy?...bullshit....
I didn't back down because of the claim; I backed down because of curiouskarmadog's tone. 83 and then 88 read like town frustration rather than faked anger.VP Baltar wrote:I'm not a fan of the quick voting to L-1 and then backing down right after a claim. Possible scum in search of power roles. Additionally, the original vote post bothers me because it's basically following others' arguments with a little fluff on top to make it look original. A lot of words with not a lot of solid reasoning.
That was kind of the point of why I attacked you. >_> Never mind that, though.curiouskarmadog wrote:how the fuck am I going to say that someone is absolutely town on page 1?
It is. I like reading tones. Seems to work.VP Baltar wrote:I also find it weird that ckd has now shifted well up the list over his tone, but I guess that's a personal thing.
I know I did.curiouskarmadog wrote:at this point in the actual game, i dont think you said anything...you really thought this was a real vote outside of anything random and/or funny?
-quotesnip-
Good, I'm not the only one. Though the sudden kiss+make up between VPB and sottyrulez is kind of unsettling.Equinox wrote:sottyrulez and VP Baltar back-and-forth nearly gave me a headache. I'm getting town vibes from both of them.
Iiiiii'm not buying this actually.VP Baltar wrote:VOTE: Equinox
I'm not a fan of the quick voting to L-1 and then backing down right after a claim. Possible scum in search of power roles.
Followed most recently by this.Vi wrote:HEY
HEY SOTTY
HEY ZACH
HEY VPB
Why don't we get over ourselves and form an AwesomeTownBlocTM? I don't really think either of you are scum as of this extremely late point in this game, and there are only a few other players left. (Besides, it's how I wanted the first game to play out )
You don't get to tell us to get over ourselves and then say you're unsettled when we actually do. This leaves me thinking that you wanted to play voice of reason and that you actually wanted us to keep fighting to the death for the next 10 pages.Alnara wrote:Good, I'm not the only one. Though the sudden kiss+make up between VPB and sottyrulez is kind of unsettling.Equinox wrote:sottyrulez and VP Baltar back-and-forth nearly gave me a headache. I'm getting town vibes from both of them.
When I put curiouskarmadog at L-1, I was serious. What I had expected was curiouskarmadog answering the questions posed to him, which he did... though the claim fucked it up. I'd have unvoted him if he'd posted something like 83 and 88 even without the claim. Those two posts (and 92) scream frustrated town to me.sottyrulez wrote:In short, running people up to lynch -1 without being serious about lynching them is scuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummy.
How was it unsettling? Seemed fine to me.Vi wrote:Though the sudden kiss+make up between VPB and sottyrulez is kind of unsettling.