Well it seems I'll be making this case. Because I'm doing it, I'm gonna do it right. This is going to very long. I'm also going to quote my old points I made in previous posts to show you that I was right way back when, and I did provide context before as well. Well here goes.
Oh, I'm also going to quote Jase as he was the only one who followed my train of logic on Sweep during day one. [This is part of the reasons I think Jase is so town.]
One more thing, read all the quotes. The real meat of the information is there.
--------
Sweep wrote:Random Number Generator picks random number 8!
Vote: Elleran
Elleran wrote:VOTE: Sweep for prizes.
Gonna pull an el simo and post this here:
http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?tit ... g_patterns
Very possible to be the separation tactic, but not incriminating by it's self.
------
It is more incriminating, however, when you realize that Sweep didn't address Elleran at any other point in the game.
The following posts are two posts apart. (Posts 123-125)
Sweep wrote:Politics, the economy? What more do you want me to say?
Bandwagons in RVS are not tells.
I think Retro is suspicious not because necessarily because of his absolute -> fuzzy (Although it is part of it) but also because of his explanation and defence being so weak.
Benmage is trying to play us.
The case against me was utter crap by ICE and must have been a gambit to draw out some scum looking for a bandwagon.
I have thought more than most players in this game already.
Sweep wrote:1. el simo - He misunderstood the point I made about Retro as previously detailed. He makes a good narrow point about Retro and his use of WIFOM.
2. Iamnobody - Inactive
3. diddin - neutral, waiting for proper analysis.
4. TheLonging - You have been jostling me for more and more information to confirm or deny your suspicions, what are your suspicions, please make them public. I don't like the stoneclad confirmation that ICE is scum when the crap in the accusation is so obviously crap that it is only there to draw a reaction from the blind.
5. ICEninja - Done
6. Slaxx - I have made a post about Slaxx and my suspicions about his initial banter but am not sure what to make of it, since then he has offered no valuable insight apart from a a small cryptic clue.
7. Retrospective - Done
8. Elleran - Neutral, more needed
9. Sweep - Me
10. Benmage - Done
11. rewq455 - Inactive
12. Jase - Inactive
Sweep wrote:The accusations brought against me by ICE sum up to a RVS vote, please try to tell me that someone serious would try to form a case of a RVS vote. It does not add up.
My read on you Retro is scum currently due to the reasons stated previously.
So, VOTE: Retrospective
Sweep wrote:
Retrospective wrote:@Sweep; I just ISO'd you, and I don't see where you gave your read on ICE.
I think that ICE has a current pro-town read. I have mentioned reasons before. #125 and #123
Sweep wrote:#123 - The case against me was utter crap by ICE and must have been a gambit to draw out some scum looking for a bandwagon.
#125 - (From TheLonging's analysis) I don't like the stoneclad confirmation that ICE is scum when the crap in the accusation is so obviously crap that it is only there to draw a reaction from the blind.
Put these together and you get the picture as to why my read on ICE is clean so far, The accusation is so obvious that it is only a real accusation to the blind.
This is incriminating for several reasons. First I'll focus on the the clearing of ICE, then we can look at him denying it.
Retrospective wrote:
Why did you assume that ICE was using a gambit? This concerns me a bit because you seemed to have skipped over the possibility of him being scum. For this to be true, ICE would also have to be reasonably sure that you were town as well. Upon rereading, it appears he wasn't. This is an interesting reaction and I will probably bring this up later.
Jase wrote:Well I can't say for certain, but I'm pretty sure Ices 'case' was a pretty standard RVS escape wagon. Not some an attempt at some sort of crazy scum finding masterstroke. It's silly to attack him for it like some people have, but equally as silly to go 'Hey nice job there townie McGuee'. Either way your explanation of his actions suggest that you either know that he's town, or you want us to think he's town when he's not. One way or the other you come off suspicious.
Retrospective wrote:My first suspicion grew on him when he implied beyond a doubt that ICE was town on like the second day. He didn't provide any case to support it it was just a matter of fact. In my opinion, he slipped. He knows that ICE isn't mafia and let that idea shine too brightly in his post. There was no way he could've been as sure as he was that ICE was town especially when ICE had put pressure on him at the same time. People were actually voting ICE at the time that sweep made the absolute statement.
Sweep completely eliminated the chance of ICE being scum even though ICE built a case on him and voted him. He was almost instantly sure that ICE was town. The reason why this is incriminating is because I think it was a slip as well as one of the moves he has already shown that he likes to do. (Appeal to attacker, read slaxx's post)
Hold on this is where it gets better. I think it's pretty apparent you can tell Sweep's position on ICE. So now read this.
Retrospective wrote:Sweep wrote:Retro wrote:My first suspicion grew on him when he implied beyond a doubt that ICE was town on like the second day. He didn't provide any case to support it it was just a matter of fact. In my opinion, he slipped. He knows that ICE isn't mafia and let that idea shine too brightly in his post. There was no way he could've been as sure as he was that ICE was town especially when ICE had put pressure on him at the same time. People were actually voting ICE at the time that sweep made the absolute statement.
Please provide Quotes to back this up, from my viewpoint I simply asserted it was such a crap case and it is acknowledged (now) that Ice does not make as crap cases as that (well, maybe not but the case was really really crap.) hence it must have been a gambit.
I was describing it as a null tell rather than town as you suggest.
Oh really? Then why is it in you next post you said ICE was town? And don't even try, it's pretty clear that you thought he was town.
I don't feel like I should have to say anything as it speaks for itself but if you missed it go read his quotes. Something doesn't belong, huh?
--------
Next we'll look at how he followed BW's late but never added anything of value.
Sweep added nothing to the Elleran wagon but let's see how many times he promised content.
Sweep wrote:I am not going to comment on Ice's post until I have my own ideas on Elleran.
Sweep wrote:Thoughts on Ell coming next post.
Then is his only post analyzing Elleran.
Sweep wrote:Elleran does make some excuses and apologies over his play indicating nerves over possible slips. (school, hamlet) but I don't have time now for a full analysis as I have been promising. Will 100% do it tomorrow.
Go check the thread, everyone had been saying it for pages. Also if you read my post after it I showed how this tell isn't even being used on the person who did it the most, diddin. [Don't worry, diddin, I don't suspect you.]
Sweep only mentioned el simo three times.
Sweep wrote:Every time I find myself reading a post by el simo, I find myself agreeing with the well structured and logical arguments which he presents, my only criticism would be that he has been quite narrow in his analysis. Mainly focusing on one or two players. His argument about Retro is very well developed but his argument on "a classic scum" (Elleran) can be summed up in the space of a few paragraphs. The disparity between the lengths indicates that he has spent a lot more time targeting Retro than Elleran even though he thinks that Elleran is more suspicious.
This is when el simo was leading and everyone was taking turns saying he was town (much to my frustration)
Then after awhile you guys start to see el simo in a scummy light and this is Sweep's only other post about el simo before day 2 after this:
Sweep wrote:About El Simo, to me his "pressure" is not pressure at all and am not sure why no-one picked up on this earlier. Maybe because his aura is "too town". I think a re-read of his play is in order.
Again we had pages of saying that his Pressure wasn't pressure before Sweep said this.
Sweep wrote:Okay so 5 pages overnight. I still want a lynch on Retro because of the past and because of his immature playing of the game. My second suspect has to be currently Simo who I see as running around his own tail trying to confuse everyone by re-refuting each point made against him by ICE, arguing over theory (which is leading us astray) and flipflopping around the shop who to vote. Saying this I still want a lynch on Retro.
Hay that sounds familiar too!
Both of these serve as a way that he can say he offered his consent without actually providing anything.
Now for me:
el simo and ICE attacked me for the stupid three mafia thing. (Now would be a good time to say "I'm sorry, Retro, it really wasn't a slip. Sorry for drawing it out and being annoying.") They also didn't like my defense to it, quickly after Sweep joins the BW.
Sweep wrote:My read on you Retro is scum currently due to the reasons stated previously.
So, VOTE: Retrospective
He didn't state any reasons previously. ICE and el simo did.
--------
Now we're gonna look at how much of a broken record he is. And I'll point out where everyone else stopped voting me and where Sweep continued. (Jase did most of the work for this section)
His post on page 8, #192 is too long for me to quote, but read over it and see if you remember hearing all those arguments before. I'll give you a hint: ICE and el simo.
Sweep wrote:Retro: I have constantly pounded you and it is evident why after reading the thread. Your arguments consistently contain huge logical flaws and whereas your original action was not very scummy, these huge holes are (as detailed extensively by el simo) extremely damning.
THIS IS WHERE OTHER PEOPLE STOPPED VOTING ME.
He then quoted some random section of one my posts and said "Another logical flaw."
Sweep wrote:Have you considered for one second that your logic is consistently flawed? Because I agree with simo, does that mean that my argument is any weaker? I agree with Simo because I have read the same things as you, I have read the same defence that he has and come to the same conclusion. You are just trying to discredit me by repeating the same argument that my material is recycled when the truth is that my argument is stronger as I am not the only one who thinks it.
Sweep wrote:Are you defending the fact that your defences contain logical flaws?
Sweep wrote:Also your incessant mentioning of me "parroting" is not a reason to discredit me. (and not a reason why I am scummy because I am not parroting). You are so angry because someone suspects you and you think that being angry will help clear your name.
Sweep wrote:Okay so 5 pages overnight. I still want a lynch on Retro because of the past and because of his immature playing of the game. My second suspect has to be currently Simo who I see as running around his own tail trying to confuse everyone by re-refuting each point made against him by ICE, arguing over theory (which is leading us astray) and flipflopping around the shop who to vote. Saying this I still want a lynch on Retro.
Now I'm going to post some of Jase's arguments:
Jase wrote:Anyways, it looks like the day is winding down. I like sweep as a lynch candidate. I've seen scum hold on desperately to what seemed like a sure lynch (in the case retro) and I think that's what's happening here. I would also accept diddin or ell.
Jase wrote:Sweep wrote:@Jase
You say that "hanging onto a sure lynch" like I don't believe that Retro is scum, the opposite is true, I still think Retro is scum.
Yeah, you're not scum because you're town right? That dispels my suspicion then. Yep. Well sort of. Actually not at all. I didn't say I thought you were town pushing a bad wagon. I think you're scum who's still trying to get what must have looked like a guaranteed lynch at first. How in any way does 'I think he's scum' refute that?
Jase wrote:Sweep: Why are you so adamant that retro is scum? Your case against him from what I can see is that 1. He reacted poorly to early pressure and 2. His arguments are flawed. Is there a part I missed? Why does this make him more scummy than anyone else.
Jase wrote:Sweep because early on retro was one hell of an easy target. Now it seems sweep is still holding on to a possible retro lynch for dear life. He hasn't tried to sell the wagon at all nor is he actively pursuing retro, but he still has him as his top suspect.
It's pretty easy to see that Jase has a point when you can see how early other's stopped voting me because I stop being their top suspect. It's curious why Sweep had so much to say just about me and literally no one else.
--------
Stuff on other players:
In my reread, I noticed that Sweep attacked Benmage a little bit. This seems to be the only thing he did himself without following other players. He attacked Ben's actvity and Ben saying that he was vet without adding much content in the beginning of the game. I hope this gives those thinking a Sweep/Ben team pause. Seems unnessary for someone who only provides recycled garbage to focus his attention on his partner without the help of someone else. Plus he never focused on Elleran so I don't see a theme here.
Through skimming through the game again I realized just how much fire there was between diddin and Elleran. There really isn't any way I can see this kid being mafia.
-------------
Before I made this post, I had slightly forgotten how much I suspected Sweep. el simo is scummy, yes. But please can we lynch Sweep today? This paired with my two cases prior to this post and Slaxx's post I'm not quite sure how you guys could justify not following me.