Mini 1061: Mafia in Someplace - Game Over!

[Slaxx]

His play didn't exactly improve Ben.

[DemonHybrid]

Ben, you realize that my first vote in the game was Sweep, right? With a giant catching-up of everything up to that point?

So your points on pg seven is why you wanted to lynch him 40 pages later? Please tell me thats what you just said.

He never got any LESS scummy.

[Benmage]

Ben, you realize that my first vote in the game was Sweep, right? With a giant catching-up of everything up to that point?

So your points on pg seven is why you wanted to lynch him 40 pages later? Please tell me thats what you just said.

He never got any LESS scummy.

Thats not the point....are the exact same points listed in PG 7 the reason you chose not to relist them 40 pages later? That's baffling.

[DemonHybrid]

And are you suggesting that I should restate a case each time I change a vote? THAT'S baffling, and dumb.

Sweep barely posted between my initial vote and my wagon vote. If anything changed, I would have posted so. Don't tell me you're one of those lazy jerks who want a wall case each time someone switches a vote.

[Benmage]

And are you suggesting that I should restate a case each time I change a vote? THAT'S baffling, and dumb.

Sweep barely posted between my initial vote and my wagon vote. If anything changed, I would have posted so. Don't tell me you're one of those lazy jerks who want a wall case each time someone switches a vote.

Your post where you vote him is post 169. Sweeps iso 11 is post 185, his iso 10 post is 142. Sweep goes on to have a total post count of 37. So to say he barely posted is definitely a misstatement. And yes if 40 pages past I expect a restatement. I’m not going to remember what happened 40 pages past. If you continuously hounded him and kept your case against him up to date, and restated often I wouldn’t need it.

[DemonHybrid]

And are you suggesting that I should restate a case each time I change a vote? THAT'S baffling, and dumb.

Sweep barely posted between my initial vote and my wagon vote. If anything changed, I would have posted so. Don't tell me you're one of those lazy jerks who want a wall case each time someone switches a vote.

Your post where you vote him is post 169. Sweeps iso 11 is post 185, his iso 10 post is 142. Sweep goes on to have a total post count of 37. So to say he barely posted is definitely a misstatement. And yes if 40 pages past I expect a restatement. I’m not going to remember what happened 40 pages past. If you continuously hounded him and kept your case against him up to date, and restated often I wouldn’t need it.

My original case was that he was lurky (moreso than ICE, who I thought was scummy at the time), threw suspicion everywhere, had wishy-washy suspicions and had bad and non-convincing cases.

We lynched him because he was lurky, threw suspicion everywhere, had wishy-washy suspicions and had bad and non-convincing cases.

Seriously, nothing has changed. He posted cases on Slaxx and Retro. I'm well aware. None of his cases convinced me because they were filled with assumptions and bad tells.

[Smitster]

MOD: Please confirm that you got the counting wrong on sweep's lynch and if you could please rectify it.

DH, you seem to have won 2 out of 5 games. You go around calling people stupid idiot and jerks. Also, how bad their tells and reads are. I'm starting to think being called stupid by you is a compliment. I think you'll lynch anyone. Psycho much?
Quote: "We lynched him because he was lurky, threw suspicion everywhere, had wishy-washy suspicions and had bad and non-convincing cases." What a joke, if you were half the player you claim to be you would have the "tells" correct. On me too, clown. Quote: "Seriously, nothing has changed. He posted cases on Slaxx and Retro. I'm well aware. None of his cases convinced me because they were filled with assumptions and bad tells."

Unvote
Vote DemonHybrid

[Smitster]

MOD: Please confirm that you got the counting wrong on sweep's lynch and if you could please rectify it.

DH, you seem to have won 2 out of 5 games. You go around calling people stupid idiot and jerks. Also, how bad their tells and reads are. I'm starting to think being called stupid by you is a compliment. I think you'll lynch anyone. Psycho much?

Unvote
Vote Demon

[Smitster]

MOD: Please confirm that you got the counting wrong on sweep's lynch and if you could please rectify it.

DH, you seem to have won 2 out of 5 games. You go around calling people stupid idiot and jerks. Also, how bad their tells and reads are. I'm starting to think being called stupid by you is a compliment. I think you'll lynch anyone. Psycho much?

Unvote
Vote Demon

[diddin]

MOD: Please confirm that you got the counting wrong on sweep's lynch and if you could please rectify it.

DH, you seem to have won 2 out of 5 games. You go around calling people stupid idiot and jerks. Also, how bad their tells and reads are. I'm starting to think being called stupid by you is a compliment. I think you'll lynch anyone. Psycho much?

Unvote
Vote Demon

>Implying that DH's play is the sole reason he wins/loses games.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Flailing, being extremely scummy, and setting up bullshit cases. Diescumdie.

Vote Smitster

This vote is pretty much a butthurt OH WAH HE'S CALLING PEOPLE DUMB AND HE SHOULDN'T CAUSE OF A WIN RECORD BAW I CANT MAKE AN ACTUAL CASE WAAAAH

[RichardGHP]

Second Vote Count of Day 3:

[4] Smitster - [

Slaxx, DemonHybrid

Benmage, TheLonging, DemonHybrid, diddin]
[0] el simo - [

Smitster

]
[1] DemonHybrid - [Smitster]
[4] Not Voting - [el simo, Slaxx, Retrospective, Jase]

With 9 alive, it takes 5 votes to achieve a lynch and to end Day 3. Deadline for this day can be found here.

---

Just to clear something up, el simo did not unvote before voting for Sweep. Retrospective was the hammer.

[DemonHybrid]

Now that the forum glitches have stopped:

Smitster, what a fucking terrible reason to suspect someone.

[Smitster]

Retro, nice hammer.
As I said, DH Quote: "That's absolutely ridiculous, Smit. "Nice hammer retro"? I'm getting kind of sick of your weak attempts to throw suspicion onto everyone. Retro was right; YOU were the hammer. You've devolved into legit scumtells now. What you just did was gloating and pinning suspicion at the same time. Retro had a completely valid case, as did the rest of us. However, you did not." - You have less of a clue than I do.

DH quote " My bad, I completely forgot that he claimed." cop out, just say you didn't read.

DH, Quote: "And are you suggesting that I should restate a case each time I change a vote? THAT'S baffling, and dumb.
Sweep barely posted between my initial vote and my wagon vote. If anything changed, I would have posted so. Don't tell me you're one of those lazy jerks who want a wall case each time someone switches a vote." you just mentioned something that is clearly against town. No one asked for a wall. Not even a one liner from you.

Nice counting slaxx, you and simo (or Diddin) are next.

[Smitster]

Simo saying:
"Hey guys notice how Smit just did exactly what Ell did?"
"Not to mention the opportunistic hammer"
"I would laugh if we got the vote count wrong and Retro just hammered "
and the mod confirming: "Just to clear something up, el simo did not unvote before voting for Sweep. Retrospective was the hammer."

Simo, the vet player that he is, knew what he was doing here. I see that as a scum move of note. I'll vote off him or DH in a heart beat.

[DemonHybrid]

You have less of a clue than I do.

Insult, and no merit.

cop out, just say you didn't read.

I actually had no clue that you had claimed from the get-go because you worded it so fucking terribly. Please explain to me how it's a "cop-out" and how I'm using to "cop-out" of whatever is going on in the game currently.

you just mentioned something that is clearly against town. No one asked for a wall. Not even a one liner from you.

First, please explain why it's "against town" for not restating a case when I have a giant post in my ISO stating my suspicious, which, I have clearly stated, did not change, because Sweep has been consistently scummy until his death. Second, do you have any clue what Ben and I were going back and forth about? If so, please say so.

What a joke, if you were half the player you claim to be you would have the "tells" correct. On me too, clown.

So, are you voting me because I had my read wrong on Sweep and lynched him because he was being legitimately scummy (which is what I'm trying to explain and you conveniently ignored)? If so, why did you choose me and not anyone else on this wagon? And are you suggesting that my win/loss record makes me more likely to be scum?

If not, why

are

you voting me?

[RichardGHP]

About nine and a half hours before I start prodding.

[Jase]

I won't have much time to post until at least later tonight, maybe tomorrow.

For now I'll say that I think ben has a valid case. Also smit is being overconfident. What makes you think you can get any of slaxx, simo, or diddin lynched? What makes you think you aren't going to be lynched? Nothing you say makes any sense. Quit shouting and learn how this game is actually played if you want to have a chance to be helpful.

[Retrospective]

Meh. I'm trying to care what happens next in this game. Sweep being town just ruined this game like completely.

Who does everyone think Smit's final partner is? It seems like everyone alive was ready to vote him yesterday except me and ICE. ICE is dead so that just leaves me. Think I"m his partner?

Also trying to think from mafia's point of view. ICE said a million and one times that Smit should be lynched should Sweep be town. Sweep was town and then ICE miraculously dies. Smit is obviously new at this game, but do you think he would kill the person that was pushing for his lynch? It seems more likley that he's an easy lynch and mafia set it up further by killing ICE.

I'm still in favor of a massclaim. There was a save yesterday and we should have some investigative role. That leaves 3 clears does it not? It would significantly narrow down our list of suspects and force mafia to have to cc today if they're going to cc at all. Seeing as this game is dying, I really don't see the downside. So what if it outs the prs mafia has only killed one person and they were town. They can't kill all of us before we find the last two mafia.

[Slaxx]

I think I agree with Retro. An investigative role should have two reports, and whoever stopped the first kill has something too. Not to mention there are probably 3 PRs in the game, and mafia is probably going to hit one tonight (9 players, 2 mafia, 2 have claimed blue, so that leaves 3/5 odds for mafia tonight if we NL, which we wont, but still).

[Slaxx]

Well, I guess thats assumign our blue claims arent mafia. Lmao.

[Slaxx]

Well, I guess thats assumign our blue claims arent mafia. Lmao.

[Jase]

Mod: What's going on with simos slot? He said something about being replaced didn't he?

[Jase]

[\b]

[diddin]

I agree that we should massclaim today. If there are no objections, I will start.

[RichardGHP]

Mod: What's going on with simos slot? He said something about being replaced didn't he?

Yes, I believe so. Since no replacement request was officially made, I'm going to treat him as active and prod him. If he doesn't respond in 48 hours, I will force-replace. 5 days is plenty of time to post, international travel or no. Nobdy else needs a prod at present, though TheLonging will be eligible for one tomorrow.

As an aside, if the forums are playing up on you, and posts aren't submitting, don't hit "Submit" multiple times in frustration. The result is double or triple posting, which I, as a

game

moderator, do not have the ability to delete or override. Flay informs me he's working on it, but in the meantime, just be cautious. Thanks in advance!